BMW F 850 GS 2018 vs. BMW S 1000 XR 2021
BMW F 850 GS 2018
BMW S 1000 XR 2021
Visão geral - BMW F 850 GS 2018 vs BMW S 1000 XR 2021
The BMW F 850 GS 2018 and the BMW S 1000 XR 2021 are both motorcycles produced by BMW, but they have some key differences in terms of specifications and features.
Starting with the engine, the BMW F 850 GS 2018 is equipped with an inline twin-cylinder engine with a displacement of 853cc, producing 95 horsepower and 92 Nm of torque. On the other hand, the BMW S 1000 XR 2021 features a more powerful inline four-cylinder engine with a displacement of 999cc, delivering 165 horsepower and 114 Nm of torque. This makes the S 1000 XR significantly more powerful than the F 850 GS.
In terms of suspension, both motorcycles have a telescopic fork at the front and a swingarm with a monoshock at the rear. However, the F 850 GS has a larger suspension travel, with 204mm at the front and 219mm at the rear, compared to the S 1000 XR's 150mm of travel at both ends. The F 850 GS also offers adjustable pre-load and recovery settings for the rear suspension, while the S 1000 XR features electronic suspension adjustment with compression, pre-load, and recovery settings.
BMW F 850 GS 2018
When it comes to the chassis, the F 850 GS has a steel frame, while the S 1000 XR has an aluminum frame. The F 850 GS has a rake angle of 62 degrees and a trail of 126mm, while the S 1000 XR has a slightly steeper rake angle of 65.1 degrees and a trail of 116mm. These differences in chassis design and geometry may result in variations in handling and stability between the two motorcycles.
In terms of braking, both motorcycles are equipped with dual disc brakes at the front. However, the F 850 GS has smaller 305mm discs, while the S 1000 XR has larger 320mm discs. This may result in differences in braking performance and feel between the two models.
In terms of dimensions and weights, the F 850 GS has a narrower front tire (90mm) and a wider rear tire (150mm), compared to the S 1000 XR's front tire width of 120mm and rear tire width of 190mm. The F 850 GS has a longer wheelbase of 1593mm, compared to the S 1000 XR's 1552mm. The seat height is also slightly higher on the F 850 GS at 860mm, compared to the S 1000 XR's 840mm. Both motorcycles have a similar weight, with the F 850 GS weighing 229kg (with ABS) and the S 1000 XR weighing 226kg (with ABS). However, the S 1000 XR has a larger fuel tank capacity of 20 liters, compared to the F 850 GS's 15 liters.
BMW S 1000 XR 2021
In terms of strengths, the F 850 GS offers a superior motor, suitable braking system, very good seating position, easy handling, a wide range of accessories, off-road capability, and various riding modes and traction control. On the other hand, the S 1000 XR has strengths such as practical riding modes, an excellent four-cylinder engine with a high number of rotations and a wide range of usable rotations, a well-balanced vehicle even with a passenger, and good brakes.
However, both motorcycles have some weaknesses. The F 850 GS has a low disc, and the sound could be better. The S 1000 XR has a slightly narrow knee angle for tall riders on long journeys, suspension damping that is not sensitive enough for a truly comfortable setup, and higher fuel consumption.
In conclusion, the BMW F 850 GS 2018 and the BMW S 1000 XR 2021 are both capable motorcycles, but they cater to different riding preferences. The F 850 GS is more suitable for off-road adventures and offers a more comfortable seating position, while the S 1000 XR is geared towards sport touring with its powerful engine and advanced features.
Especificações técnicas BMW F 850 GS 2018 em comparação com BMW S 1000 XR 2021
Prós e contras em comparação
Prós e contras em comparação
BMW F 850 GS 2018
Pode não se ver à primeira vista no novo BMW F 850 GS, mas é de facto um design completamente novo. Tanto o chassis em aço como a transmissão foram alterados, o motor foi aumentado para 853 cilindradas e concebido para ser ainda mais potente com o desvio de 90 graus da cambota. Como resultado, o novo F 850 GS apresenta-se mais soberano do que entusiasmado e é convincente tanto em estrada como fora de estrada. A particularidade da BMW é a possibilidade de a adaptar exatamente às suas necessidades pessoais graças à extensa gama de acessórios - na verdade, não há nenhuma caraterística atualmente disponível que não possa ser colocada na sua F 850 GS. No entanto, isto também faz aumentar o preço.
BMW S 1000 XR 2021
A BMW S 1000 XR oferece uma agradável moto de turismo com base numa moto super desportiva. Parece um compromisso - mas é um desenvolvimento perfeito. A mota é prática e madura. A proteção contra o vento e as intempéries é muito boa, a integração a partir do telemóvel é bem testada e intuitiva e o motor é simplesmente sempre um prazer de conduzir. O chassis adapta-se bem às condições de carga, mas nunca se torna sensível e é realmente confortável. O conforto do assento é bom, mas o ângulo dos joelhos torna-se um pouco agudo em viagens longas. No entanto, esta é uma excelente moto para quem gosta de andar desportivamente, mas também para quem gosta de ir longe.
Comparação de preços Preço médio de mercado BMW F 850 GS vs BMW S 1000 XR
There are a few key differences between a BMW F 850 GS 2018 and a BMW S 1000 XR 2021. In terms of price, the actual average price of a BMW S 1000 XR 2021 is about 52% higher. A BMW F 850 GS 2018 experiences a loss of 16.390 BRL in one year of ownership. This is offset by a loss of 4.110 BRL for a BMW S 1000 XR 2021. Compared to BMW S 1000 XR 2021 there are less BMW F 850 GS 2018 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 5 compared to 13. It takes less time to sell a BMW S 1000 XR with 71 days compared to 112 days for the BMW F 850 GS. Since model year 2018 1000PS.de editors have written 31 reviews for the BMW F 850 GS and 40 reviews for the BMW S 1000 XR since model year 2015. The first review for the BMW F 850 GS was published on 21/11/2017 and now has more than 69.800 views. This compares to more than 16.000 views for the first review on BMW S 1000 XR published on 21/10/2014.
