Honda CB500F 2013 vs. Kawasaki ER-6n 2013

The Honda CB500F 2013 and the Kawasaki ER-6n 2013 are both naked bikes with similar technical specifications. However, there are some notable differences between the two models.

In terms of power, the Kawasaki ER-6n has a significant advantage over the Honda CB500F. The ER-6n is equipped with a 72 HP engine, while the CB500F has a 48 HP engine. This means that the Kawasaki has more power and is likely to offer a more exhilarating riding experience.

In terms of torque, the Kawasaki ER-6n also has an advantage with 64 Nm compared to the Honda CB500F's 43 Nm. This higher torque allows for better acceleration and overall performance.

Both bikes have a liquid-cooled, inline twin-cylinder engine, which is a popular choice for this type of motorcycle. This type of engine provides a good balance between power and fuel efficiency.

Honda CB500F 2013

In terms of chassis, both bikes have a steel frame, which provides good stability and durability. However, the Honda CB500F has been praised for its agile handling and maneuverability, making it a great option for riders who enjoy twisty roads or urban riding. The Kawasaki ER-6n is also known for its solid handling, offering a stable and confident ride.

When it comes to braking, the Kawasaki ER-6n has the advantage of having dual disc brakes at the front, while the Honda CB500F only has a single disc brake. This means that the ER-6n is likely to offer better stopping power and control.

In terms of dimensions and weights, both bikes have similar tire widths and diameters, as well as the same wheelbase length. However, there are some differences in seat height and weight. The Honda CB500F has a lower seat height of 790 mm, compared to the ER-6n's 805 mm. This may make the Honda more accessible for shorter riders. Additionally, the Honda CB500F is lighter, weighing 192 kg (with ABS) compared to the ER-6n's 208 kg (with ABS).

Kawasaki ER-6n 2013

In terms of fuel capacity, the Kawasaki ER-6n has a slightly larger tank with a capacity of 16 liters, while the Honda CB500F has a 15.7-liter tank. This may give the ER-6n a slightly longer range between refueling stops.

In terms of strengths, the Honda CB500F is praised for its relatively low weight, agile handling, acceptable chassis, good comfort, strong engine, and comfortable seating position. On the other hand, the Kawasaki ER-6n is known for its solid handling and high level of quality.

However, both bikes have their weaknesses. The Honda CB500F has been criticized for its partially deficient finish and the lack of a gear indicator. The Kawasaki ER-6n has been noted for having weak brakes.

Overall, both the Honda CB500F 2013 and the Kawasaki ER-6n 2013 are capable naked bikes with their own strengths and weaknesses. The choice between the two will ultimately depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.