Husaberg FE 450 2012 vs. Husqvarna FE 501 2016
Husaberg FE 450 2012
Husqvarna FE 501 2016
Visão geral - Husaberg FE 450 2012 vs Husqvarna FE 501 2016
In terms of technical specifications, both the Husaberg FE 450 2012 and the Husqvarna FE 501 2016 have a single-cylinder engine with a bore of 95mm. However, the stroke of the Husaberg is 63.4mm, while the Husqvarna has a stroke of 72mm. This means that the Husqvarna has a larger displacement of 510.4cc compared to the Husaberg's 449.3cc.
In terms of starting mechanism, the Husaberg features an electric start, while the Husqvarna has a kick start. Both models have a chain transmission and a suspension system with telescopic forks in the front and WP brand suspension in the rear.
Husaberg FE 450 2012
When it comes to the chassis, the Husaberg has a double cradle, perimeter frame, while the Husqvarna has a central tube frame. The dimensions and weights of the two bikes are quite similar, with both having a 21-inch front tire diameter, 140mm rear tire width, and 18-inch rear tire diameter. The wheelbase of the Husqvarna is slightly longer at 1482mm compared to the Husaberg's 1475mm. The seat height of the Husqvarna is also slightly lower at 970mm compared to the Husaberg's 985mm. In terms of weight, the Husqvarna is slightly lighter at 113.5kg compared to the Husaberg's 114kg. Both models have a fuel tank capacity of around 8.5-9 liters.
Now, let's compare the strengths and weaknesses of each model. The Husaberg FE 450 2012 is praised for being a strong and reliable bike with a universal appeal. It has stood the test of time and is still considered a formidable machine. On the other hand, the Husqvarna FE 501 2016 offers several improvements over its predecessor. It has become significantly lighter, making it easier to handle. Additionally, it boasts a more powerful engine, providing riders with enhanced performance.
Husqvarna FE 501 2016
As for weaknesses, the Husaberg FE 450 2012 does not have any specific weaknesses mentioned. However, the Husqvarna FE 501 2016 is noted to be a more expensive model compared to the Husaberg.
In conclusion, both the Husaberg FE 450 2012 and the Husqvarna FE 501 2016 are capable enduro bikes with their own strengths and weaknesses. The Husaberg is known for its strong and reliable engine, while the Husqvarna offers improvements in terms of weight and performance. Ultimately, the choice between the two would depend on the rider's preferences and budget.
Especificações técnicas Husaberg FE 450 2012 em comparação com Husqvarna FE 501 2016
Prós e contras em comparação
Prós e contras em comparação
Husaberg FE 450 2012
O bom e velho clássico dos enduros continua a ser a 450 de cilindrada. Nenhuma outra classe de cilindrada tem tantos anos de existência como a 450, e por boas razões.
Husqvarna FE 501 2016
O trator de turismo também pode agora contar entre os pesos leves. Com menos de 110 kg e mais de 60 CV, não há lugar a desculpas. Transporta até os Wildecker Herzbuben (os dois) por todas as encostas.
Comparação de preços Preço médio de mercado Husaberg FE 450 vs Husqvarna FE 501
There are a few key differences between a Husaberg FE 450 2012 and a Husqvarna FE 501 2016. It takes less time to sell a Husaberg FE 450 with 97 days compared to 116 days for a Husqvarna FE 501. Since model year 2009 1000PS.de editors have written 8 reviews for the Husaberg FE 450 and 6 reviews for the Husqvarna FE 501 since model year 2014. The first review for the Husaberg FE 450 was published on 03/12/2007 and now has more than 6.700 views. This compares to more than 91.700 views for the first review on Husqvarna FE 501 published on 14/07/2016.
