BMW R 1200 GS 2016 vs. BMW S 1000 R 2021
BMW R 1200 GS 2016
BMW S 1000 R 2021
Overview - BMW R 1200 GS 2016 vs BMW S 1000 R 2021
The BMW R 1200 GS 2016 is equipped with a Boxer engine, which provides a powerful performance. It has a bore of 101 mm and a stroke of 73 mm, resulting in a displacement of 1170 cc. The engine delivers a maximum power of 125 HP and a torque of 125 Nm. The transmission is a shaft drive, which ensures smooth and reliable power transfer. The bike features a 2-cylinder configuration and air cooling, which helps to keep the engine temperature under control.
In terms of suspension, the BMW R 1200 GS 2016 is equipped with a telescopic front suspension with preload adjustment, providing a comfortable ride. The rear suspension is a single-sided swingarm with preload adjustment, further enhancing the bike's stability and handling. The frame is made of steel and has a dual-tube design, which provides a strong and rigid structure.
The front brakes of the BMW R 1200 GS 2016 are dual disc with four-piston calipers, ensuring excellent stopping power. The bike has a front tire width of 120 mm and a diameter of 19 inches, while the rear tire has a width of 170 mm and a diameter of 17 inches. The wheelbase measures 1507 mm and the seat height is 850 mm. The bike weighs 238 kg (with ABS) and has a fuel tank capacity of 20 liters.
BMW R 1200 GS 2016
On the other hand, the BMW S 1000 R 2021 is equipped with an inline-four engine, which delivers a powerful performance. It has a bore of 80 mm and a stroke of 49.7 mm, resulting in a displacement of 999 cc. The engine produces a maximum power of 165 HP and a torque of 114 Nm. The transmission is a chain drive, which ensures efficient power transfer. The bike features a 4-cylinder configuration and liquid cooling, which helps to maintain optimal engine temperature.
In terms of suspension, the BMW S 1000 R 2021 is equipped with a upside-down telescopic front suspension with compression, preload, and rebound adjustment, providing a customizable ride. The rear suspension is a swingarm with compression, preload, and rebound adjustment, further enhancing the bike's handling and stability. The frame is made of aluminum and has a dual-tube design, providing a lightweight yet strong structure.
The front brakes of the BMW S 1000 R 2021 are dual disc with four-piston calipers, ensuring powerful and precise braking. The bike has a front tire width of 120 mm and a diameter of 17 inches, while the rear tire has a width of 190 mm and a diameter of 17 inches. The wheelbase measures 1450 mm and the seat height is 830 mm. The bike weighs 199 kg (with ABS) and has a fuel tank capacity of 16.5 liters.
BMW S 1000 R 2021
In terms of strengths, both bikes have powerful engines that deliver impressive performance. They also offer comfortable seating positions, allowing for long rides without discomfort. The BMW R 1200 GS 2016 has the added advantage of being suitable for off-road use, making it a versatile choice. Additionally, both bikes have a strong reputation for reliability and quality.
However, there are some weaknesses to consider. The BMW R 1200 GS 2016 has a long and expensive sidecar option, which may not be suitable for all riders. It also takes some time to get used to the Telelever front suspension, and the brakes can be overly sharp. On the other hand, the BMW S 1000 R 2021 has a good but not perfect gear lever, and the sound can still be somewhat intrusive. There are also some vibrations felt through the handlebars.
Overall, both the BMW R 1200 GS 2016 and the BMW S 1000 R 2021 offer powerful performance, comfortable riding positions, and high-quality components. The choice between the two will depend on individual preferences, with the BMW R 1200 GS 2016 being a better option for off-road enthusiasts and the BMW S 1000 R 2021 offering a more focused and sporty riding experience.
Technical Specifications BMW R 1200 GS 2016 compared to BMW S 1000 R 2021
Pros and Cons in comparison
Pros and Cons in comparison
BMW R 1200 GS 2016
Uma GS sente-se em casa em quase todo o lado - mas apenas de forma limitada na pista de corridas. É um prazer sentir a potência do bicilindro boxer parcialmente arrefecido a água à saída da curva - 125 cv só no papel parecem muito mais fracos do que os 150 ou mesmo 160 cv da concorrência. Com 125 Newton metros de binário, a aceleração a partir do fundo é soberba e a GS, com 238 quilos pronta a conduzir, não carrega demasiada flacidez apesar da sua aparência volumosa. Em curvas muito apertadas, o baixo centro de gravidade também tem um efeito positivo - a BMW R 1200 GS é muito difícil de quebrar! Mesmo a suspensão dianteira com telelever, que suprime a tendência da roda dianteira para afundar durante a travagem, encaixa-se perfeitamente no conjunto geral da GS e apenas diminui ligeiramente o seu carácter desportivo.
BMW S 1000 R 2021
É realmente impressionante como a BMW consegue sempre tornar as boas motas ainda melhores. A desportiva S 1000 R com pacote M e jantes de carbono parece um pouco ameaçadora à primeira vista. Mas mesmo em 2021, a S 1000 R oferece alta tecnologia e desempenho numa dosagem grandiosa e utilizável. A máquina conduz com precisão, maneja bem, mas não é instável. O motor dispara para fora das curvas, mas não sobrecarrega. Uma mota muito rápida!
Price Comparison Avarage Market Price BMW R 1200 GS vs BMW S 1000 R
There are a few key differences between a BMW R 1200 GS 2016 and a BMW S 1000 R 2021. In terms of price, the actual average price of a BMW S 1000 R 2021 is about 14% higher. Compared to BMW S 1000 R 2021 there are more BMW R 1200 GS 2016 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 47 compared to 15. It takes less time to sell a BMW S 1000 R with 67 days compared to 70 days for the BMW R 1200 GS. Since model year 2005 1000PS.de editors have written 98 reviews for the BMW R 1200 GS and 62 reviews for the BMW S 1000 R since model year 2014. The first review for the BMW R 1200 GS was published on 20/01/2004 and now has more than 19.100 views. This compares to more than 17.300 views for the first review on BMW S 1000 R published on 03/11/2013.
