Royal Enfield Himalayan 2024 vs. Honda NC750X 2016

The Royal Enfield Himalayan 2024 and the Honda NC750X 2016 are both enduro motorcycles, but they have some key differences in their technical specifications and strengths.

In terms of engine and power, the Royal Enfield Himalayan 2024 has a 1-cylinder engine with a displacement of 452cc, producing 40 HP of power and 40 Nm of torque. On the other hand, the Honda NC750X 2016 has a 2-cylinder engine with a displacement of 745cc, producing 55 HP of power and 68 Nm of torque. This means that the Honda NC750X has a more powerful engine compared to the Royal Enfield Himalayan.

Both motorcycles have electric start and chain transmission. They also have monoshock rear suspension and steel frame chassis. However, the Royal Enfield Himalayan has a double cradle frame, while the Honda NC750X has a tubular double tube frame. This difference in frame type may affect the handling and stability of the motorcycles.

Royal Enfield Himalayan 2024

In terms of dimensions and weights, the Royal Enfield Himalayan has a front tire diameter of 21 inches, a rear tire width of 140mm, a rear tire diameter of 17 inches, a wheelbase of 1510mm, a seat height of 825mm, and a curb weight (with ABS) of 196kg. On the other hand, the Honda NC750X has a front tire diameter of 17 inches, a rear tire width of 160mm, a rear tire diameter of 17 inches, a wheelbase of 1540mm, a seat height of 830mm, and a curb weight (with ABS) of 219kg. The Honda NC750X has a slightly larger wheelbase and higher seat height compared to the Royal Enfield Himalayan.

In terms of fuel capacity, the Royal Enfield Himalayan has a larger fuel tank with a capacity of 17 liters, while the Honda NC750X has a fuel tank capacity of 14.1 liters. This means that the Royal Enfield Himalayan has a greater range and can cover longer distances without refueling.

Honda NC750X 2016

Now let's discuss the strengths and weaknesses of each motorcycle. The Royal Enfield Himalayan 2024 has a clean and low-vibration engine, a superbly tuned chassis, good brakes, modern navigation with the TripperDash, exceptionally good ergonomics for both standing and sitting positions, a high payload capacity, ample standard equipment, and a large fuel tank for great autonomy. However, it has some weaknesses such as the need for better finishing, navigation that drains smartphone battery, and could have better wind protection.

On the other hand, the Honda NC750X 2016 has the strengths of being very maneuverable, affordable, having low fuel consumption, a dual-clutch transmission, adjustable riding modes, and good brakes. However, it has a weaker engine and an early rev limiter, which may limit its performance and acceleration.

In conclusion, the Royal Enfield Himalayan 2024 and the Honda NC750X 2016 have their own strengths and weaknesses. The Royal Enfield Himalayan offers a clean and low-vibration engine, excellent chassis, good brakes, and modern navigation, but could improve on finishing and wind protection. The Honda NC750X is very maneuverable, affordable, and has low fuel consumption, but has a weaker engine and an early rev limiter. Ultimately, the choice between these motorcycles will depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.