Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016 vs. Yamaha XSR700 2016

Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016

Yamaha XSR700 2016
Visão geral - Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016 vs Yamaha XSR700 2016
The Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016 and the Yamaha XSR700 2016 are both naked bikes with similar engine types, inline configurations, and liquid cooling systems. However, there are notable differences in their technical specifications and performance.
In terms of power, the Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016 has a more powerful engine with 149 HP compared to the Yamaha XSR700 2016's 75 HP. This makes the Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016 more suitable for riders who prefer a more aggressive and thrilling riding experience. Additionally, the Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016 has a higher torque of 106 Nm compared to the Yamaha XSR700 2016's 68 Nm, providing better acceleration and responsiveness.
Both bikes feature fuel injection systems and have 4 cylinders, ensuring efficient fuel consumption and smooth power delivery. However, the Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016 has a larger displacement of 999cc compared to the Yamaha XSR700 2016's 689cc, which contributes to its higher power output.

Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016
In terms of suspension, both bikes have telescopic front forks and swingarm rear suspension systems with monoshock absorbers. However, the Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016 has an upside-down telescopic front fork, which provides better stability and handling compared to the Yamaha XSR700 2016's regular telescopic front fork.
The chassis of the Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016 is made of aluminum, which offers a lightweight and rigid structure, enhancing its stability and maneuverability. On the other hand, the Yamaha XSR700 2016 has a steel frame, which may result in a slightly heavier overall weight.
Both bikes are equipped with advanced rider assistance systems, including ABS, ensuring optimal braking performance and safety on the road.
In terms of dimensions, both bikes have the same front tire width of 120mm and diameter of 17 inches. However, the Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016 has a wider rear tire of 190mm compared to the Yamaha XSR700 2016's 180mm. The Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016 also has a longer wheelbase of 1460mm compared to the Yamaha XSR700 2016's 1405mm, which contributes to its stability at high speeds.

Yamaha XSR700 2016
Both bikes have the same seat height of 815mm, providing a comfortable riding position for most riders. However, the Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016 has a slightly higher curb weight of 209kg compared to the Yamaha XSR700 2016's 186kg, which may affect its maneuverability at lower speeds.
In terms of fuel capacity, the Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016 has a larger fuel tank with a capacity of 17 liters compared to the Yamaha XSR700 2016's 14 liters, allowing for longer rides without the need for frequent refueling.
In summary, the Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016 offers a more powerful and thrilling riding experience with its higher horsepower and torque output. It also has a more stable and responsive chassis, making it suitable for riders who prefer a sportier riding style. On the other hand, the Yamaha XSR700 2016 offers a more comfortable and easy-to-handle ride with its elastic engine and direct transmission. It also boasts good build quality. However, it has a slightly softer chassis and may require some time to get used to the seating position. Ultimately, the choice between the two bikes depends on the rider's preferences and riding style.
Especificações técnicas Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016 em comparação com Yamaha XSR700 2016
Prós e contras em comparação
Prós e contras em comparação
Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016

Alguns poderão ficar surpreendidos com o facto de, depois de tanto tempo de espera, a Suzuki não ter lançado a derradeira e intransigente moto naked de potência. Em vez disso, a Suzuki GSX-S 1000 com os seus 149 cv parece quase demasiado bem comportada. Mas quando a conduzimos na pista de corrida, rapidamente nos apercebemos que o motor é muito mais potente na vida real e que o resto do desempenho do chassis e do sistema de travagem também é impressionante. Em contrapartida, também oferece uma grande parte da adequação quotidiana e prática - nada mau quando se tem de cobrir tudo, desde o quotidiano à pista de corrida, com uma única moto.
Yamaha XSR700 2016

Se quiser uma moto de entrada que o deixe satisfeito durante muito tempo, mas que ao mesmo tempo tenha um visual retro, não há como evitar a Yamaha XSR 700. Com a MT-07 como base técnica, está a comprar aquela que é provavelmente a moto para principiantes mais popular do momento - apenas com uma aparência diferente. O maior triunfo da XSR 700 é o seu incrivelmente elástico motor de dois cilindros em linha, que não sobrecarrega os principiantes nem aborrece os motociclistas experientes. A resposta do acelerador é agradavelmente direta e a potência desenvolve-se de forma muito harmoniosa, nunca haverá aqui um momento de "oops". No entanto, a XSR 700 deve ser vista como uma moto de cruzeiro descontraída e não como uma moto desportiva. O chassis oscila muito facilmente quando conduzido a alta velocidade e traz incerteza ao veículo. Os condutores experientes vão achar que é fácil lidar com isso, mas um principiante pode sentir-se sobrecarregado.
Comparação de preços Preço médio de mercado Suzuki GSX-S1000 vs Yamaha XSR700
There are a few key differences between a Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016 and a Yamaha XSR700 2016. In terms of price, the actual average price of a Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016 is about 25% higher. A Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016 experiences a loss of 600 BRL in one year of ownership. This is offset by a loss of 670 BRL for a Yamaha XSR700 2016. Compared to Yamaha XSR700 2016 there are more Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 10 compared to 9. It takes less time to sell a Yamaha XSR700 with 85 days compared to 109 days for the Suzuki GSX-S1000. Since model year 2015 1000PS.de editors have written 36 reviews for the Suzuki GSX-S1000 and 26 reviews for the Yamaha XSR700 since model year 2015. The first review for the Suzuki GSX-S1000 was published on 27/09/2014 and now has more than 17.100 views. This compares to more than 13.700 views for the first review on Yamaha XSR700 published on 22/07/2015.