Kawasaki ER-6n 2013 vs. Honda CB650F 2017

The Kawasaki ER-6n model year 2013 and the Honda CB650F model year 2017 are both naked bikes with similar engine specifications. Both bikes have an inline engine type, liquid cooling, and a displacement of 649cc. However, there are some notable differences between the two models.

In terms of power, the Honda CB650F 2017 has a higher horsepower of 91 HP compared to the Kawasaki ER-6n 2013, which has 72 HP. This difference in power may result in a more thrilling and exhilarating riding experience on the Honda CB650F.

When it comes to torque, the Kawasaki ER-6n 2013 has a slightly higher torque of 64 Nm compared to the Honda CB650F 2017, which has 63 Nm. Although the difference is minimal, it may still affect the bike's performance and acceleration.

Kawasaki ER-6n 2013

Both bikes have a monoshock rear suspension and a steel frame chassis, providing stability and control during rides. The front brakes on both models are double disc with dual pistons, ensuring efficient stopping power. However, the Honda CB650F 2017 has wave technology brakes, which may offer better performance and heat dissipation compared to the petal technology brakes on the Kawasaki ER-6n 2013.

In terms of dimensions and weights, the Honda CB650F 2017 has a wider rear tire of 180mm compared to the 160mm rear tire of the Kawasaki ER-6n 2013. This wider tire may provide better traction and stability during cornering. The Honda CB650F also has a longer wheelbase of 1450mm compared to the 1410mm wheelbase of the Kawasaki ER-6n, which may result in improved stability and handling.

Both bikes have a seat height of around 800mm, making them suitable for riders of various heights. The Kawasaki ER-6n 2013 weighs slightly more at 204kg (208kg with ABS) compared to the Honda CB650F 2017, which weighs 200kg (208kg with ABS). The Honda CB650F also has a larger fuel tank capacity of 17.3 liters compared to the 16-liter capacity of the Kawasaki ER-6n.

Honda CB650F 2017

In terms of strengths, the Kawasaki ER-6n 2013 is praised for its solid handling and high level of quality. On the other hand, the Honda CB650F 2017 is commended for its sufficient torque even at low revs, sporty chassis, LED lighting technology, and mature appearance.

However, both models have their weaknesses. The Kawasaki ER-6n 2013 is criticized for having weak brakes, which may affect the bike's overall safety and stopping power. The Honda CB650F 2017 has a difficult-to-read screen, which may be inconvenient for riders who rely on the display for information.

In summary, while both the Kawasaki ER-6n 2013 and the Honda CB650F 2017 are capable naked bikes with similar engine specifications, the Honda CB650F offers more power, a wider rear tire, and a longer wheelbase. However, the Kawasaki ER-6n is praised for its solid handling and high quality. Ultimately, the choice between the two models will depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.