Kawasaki ER-6n 2013 vs. Yamaha MT-09 2017
Kawasaki ER-6n 2013
Yamaha MT-09 2017
Visão geral - Kawasaki ER-6n 2013 vs Yamaha MT-09 2017
The Kawasaki ER-6n model year 2013 and the Yamaha MT-09 model year 2017 are both naked bikes with inline engines. However, there are several differences between the two models.
In terms of power, the Yamaha MT-09 has a clear advantage with 115 horsepower compared to the Kawasaki ER-6n's 72 horsepower. The Yamaha also has a higher torque of 87.5 Nm compared to the Kawasaki's 64 Nm. This means that the Yamaha will provide a more powerful and responsive ride.
Both bikes have liquid cooling systems and monoshock rear suspensions. However, there are differences in their chassis. The Kawasaki has a steel frame with a perimeter design, while the Yamaha has an aluminum frame with a double tube design. The Yamaha's frame is likely to be lighter and more rigid, providing better handling and stability.
Kawasaki ER-6n 2013
In terms of braking, both bikes have dual disc front brakes. However, the Yamaha MT-09 has the advantage of a Magura HC3 radial brake pump, which is known for its excellent performance. The Kawasaki ER-6n, on the other hand, is criticized for having weak brakes.
When it comes to dimensions and weights, the Yamaha MT-09 has a wider rear tire (180mm) compared to the Kawasaki ER-6n's 160mm rear tire. The Yamaha also has a slightly longer wheelbase of 1440mm compared to the Kawasaki's 1410mm. Both bikes have similar seat heights, with the Yamaha being slightly taller at 815mm compared to the Kawasaki's 805mm. In terms of weight, the Yamaha is lighter at 193kg compared to the Kawasaki's 208kg.
In terms of fuel capacity, the Kawasaki has a larger fuel tank with a capacity of 16 liters compared to the Yamaha's 14 liters. This means that the Kawasaki may have a longer range before needing to refuel.
Yamaha MT-09 2017
In terms of strengths, the Kawasaki ER-6n is praised for its solid handling and high level of quality. On the other hand, the Yamaha MT-09 has several strengths including the Öhlins suspension, the Akrapovic exhaust system for improved aesthetics and sound, the Magura HC3 radial brake pump for excellent braking performance, and the Carbon2Race covers for a great visual appeal. The combination of the seat, footrests, and handlebar clamps on the Yamaha is also highly effective.
In terms of weaknesses, the Kawasaki ER-6n is criticized for having weak brakes. On the other hand, the Yamaha MT-09 has some drawbacks including higher cost, longer installation time for certain parts, and the ECU Flash not being road legal.
Overall, the Yamaha MT-09 2017 offers more power, better braking performance, and some additional features compared to the Kawasaki ER-6n 2013. However, the Kawasaki may appeal to riders looking for solid handling and a higher level of quality.
Especificações técnicas Kawasaki ER-6n 2013 em comparação com Yamaha MT-09 2017
Prós e contras em comparação
Prós e contras em comparação
Kawasaki ER-6n 2013
O motor é potente e muito divertido, e o ER brilha com um acabamento japonês meticuloso e um preço de combate.
Yamaha MT-09 2017
Andar depressa é possível, mas é cansativo. O guiador alto é contraproducente na pista de corrida e exige muito esforço físico. A MT-09 não consegue acompanhar o ritmo da Street Triple R, mesmo com a suspensão WP.
Comparação de preços Preço médio de mercado Kawasaki ER-6n vs Yamaha MT-09
There are a few key differences between a Kawasaki ER-6n 2013 and a Yamaha MT-09 2017. It takes less time to sell a Kawasaki ER-6n with 42 days compared to 73 days for a Yamaha MT-09. Since model year 2006 1000PS.de editors have written 16 reviews for the Kawasaki ER-6n and 57 reviews for the Yamaha MT-09 since model year 2013. The first review for the Kawasaki ER-6n was published on 29/06/2005 and now has more than 11.200 views. This compares to more than 39.900 views for the first review on Yamaha MT-09 published on 10/06/2013.
