BMW S 1000 R 2016 vs. KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2014
BMW S 1000 R 2016
KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2014
Vue d’ensemble - BMW S 1000 R 2016 vs KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2014
The BMW S 1000 R 2016 and the KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2014 are both naked bikes that offer impressive performance and features. However, they have some key differences that set them apart.
In terms of engine power, the KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2014 takes the lead with 173 HP compared to the BMW S 1000 R 2016's 160 HP. This gives the KTM a slight advantage in terms of acceleration and top speed. Additionally, the KTM has a higher torque of 144 Nm compared to the BMW's 112 Nm, which can contribute to better low-end power and responsiveness.
Both bikes feature upside-down telescopic forks in the front suspension, which provide excellent handling and stability. The BMW S 1000 R 2016 has an aluminum frame, while the KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2014 has a chromium-molybdenum frame. Both frames are known for their strength and rigidity, but the KTM's frame may offer slightly better durability.
In terms of braking systems, both bikes have four-piston front calipers and radial technology. However, the KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2014 has the additional feature of monoblock calipers, which can provide even greater braking performance and control.
BMW S 1000 R 2016
When it comes to advanced rider assistance systems, the BMW S 1000 R 2016 offers dynamic suspension, which can automatically adjust to different road conditions for optimal comfort and handling. On the other hand, the KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2014 is equipped with ABS and traction control, providing added safety and stability.
In terms of dimensions and weights, the KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2014 has a slightly longer wheelbase of 1482 mm compared to the BMW S 1000 R 2016's 1439 mm. This can contribute to better stability and cornering performance. The seat height of the KTM is also slightly higher at 835 mm compared to the BMW's 814 mm.
In terms of weight, the KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2014 is lighter with a kerb weight of 189 kg compared to the BMW S 1000 R 2016's 207 kg. This can contribute to better agility and maneuverability.
KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2014
Both bikes have similar tire widths and diameters, with a front tire width of 120 mm and a rear tire width of 190 mm, both with a 17-inch diameter. They also have similar fuel tank capacities, with the KTM having a slightly larger capacity of 18 liters compared to the BMW's 17.5 liters.
In terms of strengths, the BMW S 1000 R 2016 is praised for its powerful and well-controllable engine, powerful braking system, and comfortable seating position. On the other hand, the KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2014 is known for its precise handling, traction control, and powerful engine.
In terms of weaknesses, the BMW S 1000 R 2016 is noted for its expensive optional extras and a hard chassis. The KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2014 is considered to have a high price.
Overall, both the BMW S 1000 R 2016 and the KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2014 are impressive naked bikes with their own unique strengths and weaknesses. The choice between them ultimately depends on the rider's preferences and priorities.
Caractéristiques techniques BMW S 1000 R 2016 par rapport à KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2014
Avantages et inconvénients en comparaison
Avantages et inconvénients en comparaison
BMW S 1000 R 2016
Sur la BMW S 1000 R, on remarque à la fois la parenté étroite avec la Superbike S 1000 RR et la volonté de doter la machine d'un niveau de confort élevé pour la route et le quotidien. Le moteur quatre cylindres de 1000 cm3 se met donc au travail de manière brutale, tout en restant bien contrôlable, et la position de conduite est par conséquent confortable et sportive. Le fait que la S 1000 R soit l'une des power naked bikes les plus abordables est surprenant et réjouissant, mais il ne faut pas pour autant mettre la main sur la liste des équipements spéciaux - car grâce aux nombreuses caractéristiques irrésistibles, elle sera certainement plus chère.
KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2014
Avec toute la puissance et les vidéos "Beast" de KTM, ce monstre de puissance est en fait une moto 100% adaptée à la vie de tous les jours pour les randonnées ou le chemin du travail.
Comparaison des prix Prix moyen du marché BMW S 1000 R vs KTM 1290 Super Duke R
There are a few key differences between a BMW S 1000 R 2016 and a KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2014. In terms of price, the actual average price of a BMW S 1000 R 2016 is about 17% higher. A BMW S 1000 R 2016 experiences a loss of 380 USD in one year and 1,940 USD in two years of ownership. This is offset by a loss of 1,500 USD and 2,500 USD for a KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2014. There are the same number of bikes of both models available on the 1000PS.de marketplace, specifically 10. It takes less time to sell a KTM 1290 Super Duke R with 46 days compared to 69 days for the BMW S 1000 R. Since model year 2014 1000PS.de editors have written 62 reviews for the BMW S 1000 R and 65 reviews for the KTM 1290 Super Duke R since model year 2013. The first review for the BMW S 1000 R was published on 11/3/2013 and now has more than 17,300 views. This compares to more than 4,900 views for the first review on KTM 1290 Super Duke R published on 11/8/2012.
