BMW S 1000 RR 2010 vs. KTM 1190 RC8 R 2009

BMW S 1000 RR 2010

BMW S 1000 RR 2010

KTM 1190 RC8 R 2009

KTM 1190 RC8 R 2009

Loading...

Vue d’ensemble - BMW S 1000 RR 2010 vs KTM 1190 RC8 R 2009

The BMW S 1000 RR 2010 and the KTM 1190 RC8 R 2009 are both powerful supersport motorcycles that offer thrilling performance on the road. However, there are some key differences between the two models.

In terms of engine specifications, the BMW S 1000 RR 2010 has a 999cc engine with a bore of 80mm and a stroke of 49.7mm. It produces an impressive 192 horsepower and 112 Nm of torque. On the other hand, the KTM 1190 RC8 R 2009 has a larger 1195cc engine with a bore of 105mm and a stroke of 69mm. It generates 165 horsepower and 123 Nm of torque. While the BMW has a higher power output, the KTM's engine is known for its direct and agile response.

Both motorcycles have a high compression ratio, with the BMW at 13 and the KTM at 13.5. This indicates that both engines are designed to deliver maximum power and efficiency. The BMW S 1000 RR 2010 has four cylinders, while the KTM 1190 RC8 R 2009 has two cylinders. This difference in cylinder configuration can affect the overall performance and feel of the motorcycle.

BMW S 1000 RR 2010

BMW S 1000 RR 2010

In terms of suspension, the BMW S 1000 RR 2010 features a telescopic fork at the front, while the KTM 1190 RC8 R 2009 has an upside-down telescopic fork. Both suspension setups are designed to provide optimal handling and stability, but the KTM's upside-down fork may offer better performance in certain situations.

When it comes to the chassis, the BMW S 1000 RR 2010 has an aluminum frame with a twin tube design, while the KTM 1190 RC8 R 2009 has a chromium-molybdenum frame with a tubular design. Both frames are lightweight and provide good rigidity, but the choice between aluminum and chromium-molybdenum can affect the overall handling characteristics of the motorcycle.

In terms of braking technology, both motorcycles feature radial brakes at the front. Radial brakes provide improved stopping power and better feel compared to traditional brakes. This ensures that both the BMW and the KTM offer excellent braking performance.

In terms of dimensions and weights, the BMW S 1000 RR 2010 has a slightly longer wheelbase of 1432mm compared to the KTM 1190 RC8 R 2009's 1425mm. The seat height of the BMW is also slightly higher at 820mm compared to the KTM's 805mm. The BMW S 1000 RR 2010 is slightly heavier with a kerb weight of 204kg, while the KTM 1190 RC8 R 2009 weighs 182kg. Both motorcycles have a fuel tank capacity of around 17.5 liters.

KTM 1190 RC8 R 2009

KTM 1190 RC8 R 2009

In terms of strengths, the BMW S 1000 RR 2010 offers superior performance with its powerful engine and well-functioning driving aids. It is known for its speed and has an optimal price point. On the other hand, the KTM 1190 RC8 R 2009 boasts an optimal chassis, great braking capabilities, improved shiftability, positive ergonomics, and a powerful engine that delivers direct and agile performance.

However, there are also weaknesses to consider. The BMW S 1000 RR 2010 may have agility issues and complicated handling, as well as braking stability concerns due to its high weight. On the other hand, the KTM 1190 RC8 R 2009 may have brake dosing issues, poor splash protection on the rear wheel, and poor stability during setup.

In conclusion, both the BMW S 1000 RR 2010 and the KTM 1190 RC8 R 2009 are impressive supersport motorcycles that offer thrilling performance on the road. The BMW excels in terms of performance and driving aids, while the KTM stands out with its chassis, braking, and ergonomics. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.

Caractéristiques techniques BMW S 1000 RR 2010 par rapport à KTM 1190 RC8 R 2009

BMW S 1000 RR 2010
KTM 1190 RC8 R 2009

Moteur et chaîne cinématique

AlésageAlésage80 mmAlésage105 mm
CourseCourse49.7 mmCourse69 mm
Puissance du moteurPuissance du moteur192 chPuissance du moteur165 ch
Tr/min à la puissance max.Tr/min à la puissance max.13,000 tr/minTr/min à la puissance max.10,250 tr/min
CoupleCouple112 NmCouple123 Nm
Tr/min au coupleTr/min au couple9,750 tr/minTr/min au couple8,000 tr/min
Taux de compressionTaux de compression13 Taux de compression13.5
CylindresCylindres4Cylindres2
TempsTemps4 tempsTemps4 temps
CylindréeCylindrée999 cm³Cylindrée1,195 cm³

Suspension avant

Suspension avantSuspension avantFourche télescopiqueSuspension avantFourche télescopique inversée

Châssis

CadreCadreAluminiumCadreChrome-molybdène
Type de cadreType de cadreTube doubleType de cadreTubulaire

Freins avant

PistonPistonQuatre pistonsPistonQuatre pistons
Fixation d’amortisseurFixation d’amortisseurÉtrier fixeFixation d’amortisseurÉtrier fixe
TechnologieTechnologieradialTechnologieradial

Freins arrière

TypeTypeDisqueTypeDisque
PistonPistonPiston uniquePistonDouble piston
Fixation d’amortisseurFixation d’amortisseurÉtrier flottantFixation d’amortisseurÉtrier fixe

Dimensions et poids

EmpattementEmpattement1,432 mmEmpattement1,425 mm
Hauteur de selleHauteur de selle820 mmHauteur de selle805 mm
Poids en ordre de marchePoids en ordre de marche204 kgPoids en ordre de marche182 kg
Capacité du réservoir de carburantCapacité du réservoir de carburant17.5 lCapacité du réservoir de carburant16.5 l
Conformité au permisConformité au permisAConformité au permisA

Avantages et inconvénients en comparaison

Avantages et inconvénients en comparaison

BMW S 1000 RR 2010

BMW S 1000 RR 2010

Nous le devons à un ordre strict et impitoyable du patron. Il y a des contrôles de performance sévères avant que les S 1000 RR ne quittent l'usine. Chez BMW, on ne voulait pas se mouiller et risquer qu'un seul rapport de banc d'essai décevant trouve le chemin des médias.

Des performances supérieures

des aides à la conduite qui fonctionnent bien

très rapide

un prix optimal.

Agilité

maniabilité compliquée

stabilité au freinage

poids élevé.

KTM 1190 RC8 R 2009

KTM 1190 RC8 R 2009

Ce n'est pas seulement sous la pluie que l'on se réjouit de ses vertus ; la superbe position de conduite et le confort de conduite élevé - sans parler des vibrations. Mais là, la nouvelle R s'est un peu calmée, les ingénieurs ont travaillé méticuleusement sur le vilebrequin et la RC8 R picote désormais nettement moins dans les mains.

Châssis optimal

freinage formidable

changement de vitesse amélioré

ergonomie positive

moteur puissant

direct et agile.

Dosage des freins

mauvaise protection contre les projections sur la roue arrière

mauvaise stabilité lors du réglage.

Comparaison des prix Prix moyen du marché BMW S 1000 RR vs KTM 1190 RC8 R

There are a few key differences between a BMW S 1000 RR 2010 and a KTM 1190 RC8 R 2009. There are the same number of bikes of both models available on the 1000PS.de marketplace, specifically 6. It takes less time to sell a KTM 1190 RC8 R with 45 days compared to 52 days for the BMW S 1000 RR. Since model year 2010 1000PS.de editors have written 135 reviews for the BMW S 1000 RR and 19 reviews for the KTM 1190 RC8 R since model year 2009. The first review for the BMW S 1000 RR was published on 4/16/2008 and now has more than 4,000 views. This compares to more than 8,000 views for the first review on KTM 1190 RC8 R published on 11/10/2008.

Prix BMW S 1000 RR

Année modèle
Prix moyens actuels du marché

Prix KTM 1190 RC8 R

Année modèle
Prix moyens actuels du marché

Comparaisons alternatives

Partenaire 1000PS

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH