BMW C 400 X 2018 vs. Yamaha XMAX 400 2016

BMW C 400 X 2018

BMW C 400 X 2018

Yamaha XMAX 400 2016

Yamaha XMAX 400 2016

Loading...

Overview - BMW C 400 X 2018 vs Yamaha XMAX 400 2016

BMW C 400 X 2018

BMW C 400 X 2018

Yamaha XMAX 400 2016

Yamaha XMAX 400 2016

Technical Specifications BMW C 400 X 2018 compared to Yamaha XMAX 400 2016

BMW C 400 X 2018
Yamaha XMAX 400 2016

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore80 mmBore83 mm
StrokeStroke69.6 mmStroke73 mm
Engine powerEngine power34 HPEngine power31.5 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power7,500 rpmRpm at Max. Power7,500 rpm
TorqueTorque35 NmTorque34 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque6,000 rpmRpm at Torque6,000 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio11.5 Compression Ratio10.6
Clutch TypeClutch TypeCentrifugal forceClutch TypeCentrifugal force
Transmission TypeTransmission TypeVariomaticTransmission TypeAutomatic
CylindersCylinders1Cylinders1
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
Valves per cylinderValves per cylinder4Valves per cylinder4
ValvesValvesOHCValvesDOHC
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement350 ccmDisplacement395 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionTelescopic forkFront suspensionTelescopic fork

Suspension Rear

SuspensionSuspensionSwing armSuspensionUnit Swing

Chassis

FrameFrameSteelFrameAluminium

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Assistance Systems

Advanced Rider Assistance SystemsAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABSAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter15 inchFront tyre diameter15 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width150 mmRear tyre width150 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height70 %Rear tyre height70 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter14 inchRear tyre diameter13 inch
LengthLength2,210 mmLength2,190 mm
WidthWidth835 mmWidth780 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,565 mmWheelbase1,565 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height775 mmSeat Height785 mm
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity12.8 lFuel Tank Capacity14 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyA2License compliancyA2

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

BMW C 400 X 2018

BMW C 400 X 2018

BMW has certainly arrived well in the mid-size scooter segment with the C400X. Thanks to the competitive performance, the propulsion is completely satisfactory and, in combination with the sporty chassis, even gives rise to real riding pleasure. In addition, the scooter can be equipped to a very high standard (for an additional charge) and can almost be raised to motorbike level. Unfortunately, the sporty tuning of the suspension struts is not much fun on bad roads, and the front brake does not do justice to the scooter's character.

Good traction

clean response

sporty chassis

high-quality equipment possible

LED lighting technology

storage compartment variable

Suspension struts too hard on bad roads

front brake could have more bite

expensive accessories

Yamaha XMAX 400 2016

Yamaha XMAX 400 2016

The Yamaha XMAX 400 was the big surprise of the comparison test. The 395cc engine is brisk, so the 100 km/h limit is quickly cracked. In addition, there is a comfortable seating position with a small backrest and plenty of room for the feet. Unfortunately, the chassis is a bit stiff, which can be felt in the back when you hit a manhole cover. However, as soon as it goes out on the country road, the XMAX works perfectly, which means that long distances should not be a problem.

Powerful engine

comfortable seating position

lots of storage space

nice look

nice instruments

Taut chassis

fuel filler cap could be prettier

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price BMW C 400 X vs Yamaha XMAX 400

Price BMW C 400 X

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Yamaha XMAX 400

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH