Yamaha XMAX 400 2020 vs. Yamaha TMAX 560 2020

Yamaha XMAX 400 2020

Yamaha XMAX 400 2020

Yamaha TMAX 560 2020

Yamaha TMAX 560 2020

Loading...

Overview - Yamaha XMAX 400 2020 vs Yamaha TMAX 560 2020

Yamaha XMAX 400 2020

Yamaha XMAX 400 2020

Yamaha TMAX 560 2020

Yamaha TMAX 560 2020

Technical Specifications Yamaha XMAX 400 2020 compared to Yamaha TMAX 560 2020

Yamaha XMAX 400 2020
Yamaha TMAX 560 2020

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore83 mmBore70 mm
StrokeStroke73 mmStroke73 mm
Engine powerEngine power31.5 HPEngine power47.6 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power7,500 rpmRpm at Max. Power7,500 rpm
TorqueTorque34 NmTorque55.7 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque6,000 rpmRpm at Torque5,250 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio10.6 Compression Ratio10.9
Clutch TypeClutch TypeCentrifugal forceClutch TypeCentrifugal force
IgnitionIgnitionTransistorIgnitionTransistor
Transmission TypeTransmission TypeAutomaticTransmission TypeAutomatic
CylindersCylinders1Cylinders2
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
Valves per cylinderValves per cylinder4Valves per cylinder4
ValvesValvesDOHCValvesDOHC
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement395 ccmDisplacement562 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionTelescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork

Suspension Rear

SuspensionSuspensionUnit SwingSuspensionSwing arm

Chassis

FrameFrameAluminiumFrameAluminium

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Assistance Systems

Advanced Rider Assistance SystemsAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABSAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter15 inchFront tyre diameter15 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width150 mmRear tyre width160 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height70 %Rear tyre height60 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter13 inchRear tyre diameter15 inch
LengthLength2,190 mmLength2,200 mm
WidthWidth780 mmWidth765 mm
HeightHeight1,385 mmHeight1,420 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,565 mmWheelbase1,575 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height785 mmSeat Height800 mm
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity14 lFuel Tank Capacity15 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyA2License compliancyA2

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Yamaha XMAX 400 2020

Yamaha XMAX 400 2020

The Yamaha XMAX 400 was the big surprise of the comparison test. The 395cc engine is brisk, so the 100 km/h limit is quickly cracked. In addition, there is a comfortable seating position with a small backrest and plenty of room for the feet. Unfortunately, the chassis is a bit stiff, which can be felt in the back when you hit a manhole cover. However, as soon as it goes out on the country road, the XMAX works perfectly, which means that long distances should not be a problem.

Powerful engine

comfortable seating position

lots of storage space

nice look

nice instruments

Taut chassis

fuel filler cap could be prettier

Yamaha TMAX 560 2020

Yamaha TMAX 560 2020

The Yamaha TMAX 560 takes the very good basis of the predecessor model and improves in the essential places. With the completely revised engine, the shorter gear ratio and the two riding modes, the maxi scooter feels very comfortable in the city as well as on country roads and motorways and proudly represents its all-round talents in the new generation. The standard model is already well equipped, but if you want to enjoy your TMAX to the full, you should go for the Tech MAX version, which crowns the comfort chapter.

Powerful engine

Sensible riding modes

Traction control

Easy-to-read display

Sporty handling

Good range

Enough storage space

Wind protection of the legs

Seat a little wide for small pilots

Seat position could be more integrated

Plastic covers on the handlebars make you wish for the top model

Price Comparison Average Market Price Yamaha XMAX 400 vs Yamaha TMAX 560

Price Yamaha XMAX 400

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Yamaha TMAX 560

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons