Husqvarna SM 50 2013 vs. Husqvarna CR 50 2012

Husqvarna SM 50 2013

Husqvarna SM 50 2013

Husqvarna CR 50 2012

Husqvarna CR 50 2012

Loading...

Technical Specifications Husqvarna SM 50 2013 compared to Husqvarna CR 50 2012

Husqvarna SM 50 2013
Husqvarna CR 50 2012

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore39 mmBore39 mm
StrokeStroke40 mmStroke40 mm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio7 Compression Ratio7
StarterStarterKickStarterKick
Clutch TypeClutch TypeCentrifugal forceClutch TypeCentrifugal force
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
CylindersCylinders1Cylinders1
StrokesStrokes2-StrokeStrokes2-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement49 ccmDisplacement49 ccm

Suspension Front

BrandBrandMarzocchiBrandMarzocchi

Suspension Rear

BrandBrandMarzocchiBrandMarzocchi

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter12 inchFront tyre diameter12 inch
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter10 inchRear tyre diameter10 inch
WheelbaseWheelbase995 mmWheelbase995 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height680 mmSeat Height680 mm
Dry WeightDry Weight43.3 kgDry Weight43.3 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity2.7 lFuel Tank Capacity2.7 l

Alternative Comparisons