Husqvarna FE 501 2017 vs. Husqvarna SM 50 2013

Husqvarna FE 501 2017

Husqvarna FE 501 2017

Husqvarna SM 50 2013

Husqvarna SM 50 2013

Loading...

Overview - Husqvarna FE 501 2017 vs Husqvarna SM 50 2013

Husqvarna FE 501 2017

Husqvarna FE 501 2017

Husqvarna SM 50 2013

Husqvarna SM 50 2013

Technical Specifications Husqvarna FE 501 2017 compared to Husqvarna SM 50 2013

Husqvarna FE 501 2017
Husqvarna SM 50 2013

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore95 mmBore39 mm
StrokeStroke72 mmStroke40 mm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio11.8 Compression Ratio7
StarterStarterElectricStarterKick
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeCentrifugal force
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
CylindersCylinders1Cylinders1
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes2-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement510.9 ccmDisplacement49 ccm

Suspension Front

BrandBrandWPBrandMarzocchi

Suspension Rear

BrandBrandWPBrandMarzocchi

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter21 inchFront tyre diameter12 inch
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter18 inchRear tyre diameter10 inch
WheelbaseWheelbase1,495 mmWheelbase995 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height970 mmSeat Height680 mm
Dry WeightDry Weight109.3 kgDry Weight43.3 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity8.5 lFuel Tank Capacity2.7 l

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Husqvarna FE 501 vs Husqvarna SM 50

Price Husqvarna FE 501

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Husqvarna SM 50

Unfortunately, the data available to us is not sufficient to provide meaningful price information for this model.

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH