Yamaha XSR900 2016 vs. Kawasaki Z900 2020

Yamaha XSR900 2016

Yamaha XSR900 2016

Kawasaki Z900 2020

Kawasaki Z900 2020

Loading...

Преглед - Yamaha XSR900 2016 vs Kawasaki Z900 2020

The Yamaha XSR900 2016 and the Kawasaki Z900 2020 are both naked bikes with similar engine types and cooling systems. However, there are several notable differences between the two models.

In terms of engine power, the Kawasaki Z900 2020 has a slight advantage with 125.4 HP compared to the Yamaha XSR900 2016's 115 HP. Similarly, the Kawasaki Z900 2020 also has a higher torque of 98.6 Nm compared to the Yamaha XSR900 2016's 87.5 Nm. This difference in power and torque may result in a more exhilarating riding experience on the Kawasaki Z900 2020.

Another difference lies in the number of cylinders. The Yamaha XSR900 2016 has a 3-cylinder engine, while the Kawasaki Z900 2020 has a 4-cylinder engine. Generally, more cylinders provide smoother power delivery and better overall performance.

Both models feature upside-down telescopic forks for the front suspension and swing arm with a monoshock for the rear suspension. This ensures good handling and stability on both bikes.

Yamaha XSR900 2016

Yamaha XSR900 2016

In terms of chassis, the Yamaha XSR900 2016 features an aluminum frame with a twin tube design, while the Kawasaki Z900 2020 has a steel frame with a double cradle design. The choice of materials and frame design may affect the overall weight and stiffness of the bike, potentially influencing its handling characteristics.

Both bikes have double disk brakes at the front with similar diameters, ensuring reliable stopping power. Additionally, both models come equipped with ABS as standard, providing an added level of safety.

In terms of dimensions and weights, the Yamaha XSR900 2016 has a slightly shorter wheelbase of 1440 mm compared to the Kawasaki Z900 2020's 1450 mm. The seat height of the Yamaha XSR900 2016 is also slightly higher at 815 mm compared to the Kawasaki Z900 2020's 795 mm. However, the Yamaha XSR900 2016 is lighter with a kerb weight of 191 kg compared to the Kawasaki Z900 2020's 210 kg.

Moving on to the strengths of each model, the Yamaha XSR900 2016 is praised for its greedy engine, well-tuned riding modes, and the inclusion of ABS and TC as standard. It also receives positive feedback for its authentic modern design and clean workmanship.

Kawasaki Z900 2020

Kawasaki Z900 2020

On the other hand, the Kawasaki Z900 2020 is commended for its powerful four-cylinder engine, great handling, and good equipment. It is also noted for its aggressive looks and value for money.

However, there are also weaknesses associated with each model. The Yamaha XSR900 2016 is criticized for its hard chassis and the seat, which could be more comfortable. Additionally, the speedblock design of the bike is already present on many other models, potentially making it less unique.

The Kawasaki Z900 2020, on the other hand, has a menu navigation system that some riders find tiring to navigate. Furthermore, it lacks the option for a quickshifter, which could be a disadvantage for riders who prefer seamless gear shifts.

In conclusion, both the Yamaha XSR900 2016 and the Kawasaki Z900 2020 have their own strengths and weaknesses. The Yamaha XSR900 2016 offers a greedy engine and well-tuned riding modes, while the Kawasaki Z900 2020 boasts a powerful four-cylinder engine and great handling. Ultimately, the choice between the two models will depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.

Техничке спецификације Yamaha XSR900 2016 у поређењу са Kawasaki Z900 2020

Yamaha XSR900 2016
Kawasaki Z900 2020

Motor i pogonski sustav

Vrsta motoraVrsta motoraUgrađenoVrsta motoraUgrađeno
ProvrtProvrt78 mmProvrt73,4 mm
TaktTakt59,1 mmTakt56 mm
Snaga motoraSnaga motora115 KSSnaga motora125,4 KS
Broj okretaja pri maksimalnoj snaziBroj okretaja pri maksimalnoj snazi10.000 okr./minBroj okretaja pri maksimalnoj snazi9.500 okr./min
Okretni momentOkretni moment87,5 NmOkretni moment98,6 Nm
Broj okretaja pri okretnom momentuBroj okretaja pri okretnom momentu8.500 okr./minBroj okretaja pri okretnom momentu7.700 okr./min
Stupanj kompresijeStupanj kompresije11,5 Stupanj kompresije11,8
Vrsta spojkeVrsta spojkeViše ploča u uljnoj kupkiVrsta spojkeViše ploča u uljnoj kupki
PaljenjePaljenjeTranzistorPaljenjeDigitalno
PrijenosPrijenosLanacPrijenosLanac
Vrsta prijenosaVrsta prijenosaRučica mjenjačaVrsta prijenosaRučica mjenjača
Broj brzinaBroj brzina6Broj brzina6
CilindriCilindri3Cilindri4
TaktTaktČetverotaktniTaktČetverotaktni
Ventila po cilindruVentila po cilindru4Ventila po cilindru4
VentiliVentiliDOHCVentiliDOHC
HlađenjeHlađenjetekućinaHlađenjetekućina
Radni obujamRadni obujam847 ccmRadni obujam948 ccm

Prednji ovjes

Prednji ovjesPrednji ovjesPreokrenuta teleskopska vilicaPrednji ovjesPreokrenuta teleskopska vilica
PutPut137 mmPut120 mm

Stražnji ovjes

OvjesOvjesStražnji ovjesOvjesStražnji ovjes
AmortizerAmortizerJednostruki ovjesAmortizerJednostruki ovjes
PutPut130 mmPut140 mm

Šasija

OkvirOkvirAluminijOkvirČelik
Vrsta okviraVrsta okviraDvije ispušne cijeviVrsta okviraDvostruka podloga
Kut nagiba prednjeg ovjesaKut nagiba prednjeg ovjesa65 stupanjKut nagiba prednjeg ovjesa65 stupanj
TragTrag103 mmTrag105 mm

Prednje kočnice

VrstaVrstaDva diskaVrstaDva diska
PromjerPromjer298 mmPromjer300 mm

Stražnje kočnice

VrstaVrstaDiskVrstaDisk
PromjerPromjer245 mmPromjer250 mm

Sustavi za pomoć

Napredni sustavi za pomoć vozačuNapredni sustavi za pomoć vozačuABSNapredni sustavi za pomoć vozačuABS, Načini vožnje, Elektroničko upravljanje gasom, Kontrola proklizavanja

Dimenzije i težina

Širina prednje gumeŠirina prednje gume120 mmŠirina prednje gume120 mm
Visina prednje gumeVisina prednje gume70 %Visina prednje gume70 %
Promjer prednje gumePromjer prednje gume17 inčPromjer prednje gume17 inč
Širina stražnje gumeŠirina stražnje gume180 mmŠirina stražnje gume180 mm
Visina stražnje gumeVisina stražnje gume55 %Visina stražnje gume55 %
Promjer stražnje gumePromjer stražnje gume17 inčPromjer stražnje gume17 inč
DužinaDužina2.075 mmDužina2.070 mm
ŠirinaŠirina815 mmŠirina820 mm
VisinaVisina1.135 mmVisina1.065 mm
Međuosovinski razmakMeđuosovinski razmak1.440 mmMeđuosovinski razmak1.450 mm
Visina sjedalaVisina sjedala815 mmVisina sjedala795 mm
Težina neopterećenog vozila (s ABS-om)Težina neopterećenog vozila (s ABS-om)191 kgTežina neopterećenog vozila (s ABS-om)210 kg
Sukladnost licenceSukladnost licenceASukladnost licenceA

За и против у поређењу

За и против у поређењу

Yamaha XSR900 2016

Yamaha XSR900 2016

The Yamaha XSR900 is a classic optical illusion - with its round headlight, angular tank and attached tail light, it clearly passes for a retro bike. But it's no coincidence that the performance is reminiscent of the potent mid-range naked bike Yamaha MT-09, which is the extremely sporty basis for the XSR900. So the engine is a blast and the brakes are appropriately venomous. Fortunately, the engineers didn't overdo it with the chassis, the XSR900 offers sufficient comfort and the upright riding position is more comfortable than the powerful engine would lead one to expect. All in all, the XSR900 is one of the sportiest models among the retro bikes.

Extremely sporty and rev-happy engine

excellent brakes

riding at naked bike level

pleasant seating position

high-quality workmanship

price-performance ratio.

almost too direct response

retro style not thought through to the last detail

Kawasaki Z900 2020

Kawasaki Z900 2020

The Kawasaki Z900 may not be up to scratch when it comes to modern, lean angle-dependent electronic features, but it's relatively cheap and you shouldn't underestimate the fan base of the good old inline four - the Z900 is one of the cheapest ways to own such a great engine with just under a litre of displacement in a sporty naked bike! The higher weight is noticeable, but not massively annoying, because the handling and stability are quite alright. In terms of "outdated" electronics, the most annoying thing is the missing shift assistant, which is not even available as an option. Overall, however, the Z900 is a great naked bike with a great price-performance ratio.

Light and natural handling with high stability

silky engine with full pull from low revs

high chassis transparency, great feedback

seating position with feel-good factor

absolutely fair price.

Relatively cumbersome operation of the menu

no slope-dependent assistance systems

high weight

Поређење цена Просечна тржишна цена Yamaha XSR900 vs Kawasaki Z900

There are a few key differences between a Yamaha XSR900 2016 and a Kawasaki Z900 2020. In terms of price, the actual average price of a Kawasaki Z900 2020 is about 31% higher. Compared to Kawasaki Z900 2020 there are less Yamaha XSR900 2016 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 5 compared to 34. It takes less time to sell a Yamaha XSR900 with 77 days compared to 124 days for a Kawasaki Z900. Since model year 2016 1000PS.de editors have written 30 reviews for the Yamaha XSR900 and 46 reviews for the Kawasaki Z900 since model year 2017. The first review for the Yamaha XSR900 was published on 11/25/2015 and now has more than 17,600 views. This compares to more than 93,200 views for the first review on Kawasaki Z900 published on 11/11/2016.

Цена Yamaha XSR900

Модел година
Тренутне просечне тржишне цене

Цена Kawasaki Z900

Модел година
Тренутне просечне тржишне цене

Алтернативна поређења