BMW S 1000 RR 2012 vs. Suzuki GSX-R 1000 2005
BMW S 1000 RR 2012
Suzuki GSX-R 1000 2005
Преглед - BMW S 1000 RR 2012 vs Suzuki GSX-R 1000 2005
The BMW S 1000 RR 2012 and the Suzuki GSX-R 1000 2005 are both powerful supersport motorcycles with similar engine power and displacement. However, there are some notable differences between the two models.
In terms of engine power, the BMW S 1000 RR 2012 comes out on top with 192 HP, while the Suzuki GSX-R 1000 2005 offers 178 HP. This gives the BMW an advantage in terms of acceleration and top speed.
Both motorcycles have four cylinders and a 999ccm displacement, ensuring a smooth and powerful ride.
When it comes to dimensions and weights, the BMW S 1000 RR 2012 has a slightly longer wheelbase at 1432 mm compared to the Suzuki GSX-R 1000 2005's 1405 mm. This can affect the stability and handling of the motorcycle, with the BMW potentially offering better stability at high speeds.
BMW S 1000 RR 2012
The seat height of the BMW S 1000 RR 2012 is 820 mm, slightly higher than the Suzuki GSX-R 1000 2005's 810 mm. This can make a difference in terms of comfort and rider ergonomics, with taller riders potentially finding the BMW more suitable.
In terms of weight, the BMW S 1000 RR 2012 is slightly heavier at 183 kg compared to the Suzuki GSX-R 1000 2005's 166 kg. This can affect the agility and maneuverability of the motorcycle, with the Suzuki potentially offering better handling in tight corners.
Both motorcycles have a fuel tank capacity suitable for long rides, with the BMW S 1000 RR 2012 offering 17.5 liters and the Suzuki GSX-R 1000 2005 offering 18 liters.
Suzuki GSX-R 1000 2005
In terms of strengths, the BMW S 1000 RR 2012 stands out for its complete electronic equipment, including advanced features such as traction control and multiple riding modes. It also has a strong braking system and a powerful engine, making it extremely fast on the road. Additionally, it has an appropriate and stylish appearance.
On the other hand, the Suzuki GSX-R 1000 2005 has a slim appearance, which can appeal to riders looking for a sleek and sporty design. It also boasts improved performance with increased cam lift and features such as an anti-hopping clutch and superior handling.
In terms of weaknesses, the BMW S 1000 RR 2012 has a somewhat complicated chassis that may take some time for riders to get used to. On the other hand, the Suzuki GSX-R 1000 2005 is not an oversized motorcycle and the seat height may be set a little too low for some riders.
Overall, both the BMW S 1000 RR 2012 and the Suzuki GSX-R 1000 2005 are powerful and capable supersport motorcycles. The BMW offers advanced electronic features and a strong braking system, while the Suzuki has a sleek appearance and improved performance. Riders should consider their preferences and priorities to choose the motorcycle that best suits their needs.
Техничке спецификације BMW S 1000 RR 2012 у поређењу са Suzuki GSX-R 1000 2005
За и против у поређењу
За и против у поређењу
BMW S 1000 RR 2012
What remains is fascination, bewilderment and fear. You can't shake the uneasy feeling that you're not quite yourself on this bike. It feels like a heavy metal concert with earplugs.
Suzuki GSX-R 1000 2005
För att sammanfatta: "En helt fantastisk låda som faktiskt kan vara värd 15 599 euro!" Utförandet är bra, prestandan är hög och körupplevelsen är mycket bra.
Поређење цена Просечна тржишна цена BMW S 1000 RR vs Suzuki GSX-R 1000
There are a few key differences between a BMW S 1000 RR 2012 and a Suzuki GSX-R 1000 2005. There are the same number of bikes of both models available on the 1000PS.de marketplace, specifically 10. It takes less time to sell a Suzuki GSX-R 1000 with 47 days compared to 64 days for the BMW S 1000 RR. Since model year 2010 1000PS.de editors have written 135 reviews for the BMW S 1000 RR and 71 reviews for the Suzuki GSX-R 1000 since model year 2005. The first review for the BMW S 1000 RR was published on 4/16/2008 and now has more than 4,000 views. This compares to more than 7,100 views for the first review on Suzuki GSX-R 1000 published on 3/3/2004.
