Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2017 vs. BMW S 1000 R 2014

Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2017

BMW S 1000 R 2014
Преглед - Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2017 vs BMW S 1000 R 2014
The Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2017 and the BMW S 1000 R 2014 are both naked bikes that offer impressive performance and advanced features.
Starting with the engine and drive train, the Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2017 is equipped with an in-line 3-cylinder engine that delivers 123 horsepower and 77 Nm of torque. On the other hand, the BMW S 1000 R 2014 features an in-line 4-cylinder engine that produces a higher power output of 160 horsepower and 112 Nm of torque. This gives the BMW an advantage in terms of raw power and performance.
In terms of suspension, both bikes have upside-down telescopic forks at the front and a swing arm with a monoshock at the rear. The chassis of both bikes is made of aluminum and features a twin tube frame design. This ensures a lightweight and agile ride for both motorcycles.

Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2017
When it comes to braking, the Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2017 is equipped with double disk brakes at the front with four pistons and radial monoblock technology. The BMW S 1000 R 2014 also has double disk brakes at the front with four pistons and radial technology. Both bikes offer excellent braking performance, ensuring safety and control.
In terms of advanced rider assistance systems, the Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2017 comes with ABS, riding modes, ride by wire, quickshifter, and traction control. The BMW S 1000 R 2014 features dynamic suspension as its advanced rider assistance system. Both bikes offer electronic aids that enhance the riding experience and provide added safety.
In terms of dimensions and weights, both bikes have the same front tire width of 120 mm and front tire diameter of 17 inches. However, the BMW S 1000 R 2014 has a slightly wider rear tire width of 190 mm compared to the Triumph's 180 mm. The wheelbase of the BMW is also slightly longer at 1439 mm compared to the Triumph's 1410 mm. The seat height of the BMW is slightly lower at 814 mm compared to the Triumph's 825 mm. Both bikes have a similar fuel tank capacity, with the BMW having a slightly larger capacity of 17.5 liters compared to the Triumph's 17.4 liters.
In terms of strengths, the Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2017 has a wonderfully sporty engine, a quickshifter as standard, a throaty sound, an excellent braking system, and ABS and traction control that can be switched off. It also has a cool look and a low weight, which contributes to its agile handling.

BMW S 1000 R 2014
On the other hand, the BMW S 1000 R 2014 has a sporty chassis, extreme power and performance, very good electronic helpers, and a terrific price/performance ratio. It is fast and comfortable on both the racetrack and country roads.
In terms of weaknesses, the Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2017 has a complicated menu navigation, which may be a drawback for some riders. The BMW S 1000 R 2014 has a slightly rough engine running and a seat that is relatively high, which may not be suitable for shorter riders. Additionally, the design of the BMW is subjective and may be a matter of taste.
In conclusion, both the Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2017 and the BMW S 1000 R 2014 are impressive naked bikes with their own strengths and weaknesses. The Triumph offers a sporty engine and excellent braking system, while the BMW provides extreme power and performance. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.
Техничке спецификације Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2017 у поређењу са BMW S 1000 R 2014
За и против у поређењу
За и против у поређењу
Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2017

As before, the RS top model is indeed the most desirable of the Street Triples. In addition to the usual playful handling, the super-direct Brembo brakes and the lively character of the three-cylinder engine, there is now a more bulbous mid-range, upgraded electronics as well as a Brembo M50 brake and the once again sharpened appearance. Thanks to the very sporty Pirelli Supercorsa SP V3 tyres, trackdays are indeed a serious issue, and the now standard shift assistant with blipper function greatly increases the incentive to switch to the new model. A wonderful fun machine for both country road and track!
BMW S 1000 R 2014

The BMW S 1000 R impresses across the board and is much more than just a naked version of the S 1000 RR. With its own character, more torque in the mid-range and first-class electronics, it sets new standards in the high-performance Naked segment. The overall package of brutal performance, excellent suspension and practical everyday use makes it one of the best naked bikes ever - and at a surprisingly fair price.
Поређење цена Просечна тржишна цена Triumph Street Triple 765 RS vs BMW S 1000 R
There are a few key differences between a Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2017 and a BMW S 1000 R 2014. In terms of price, the actual average price of a BMW S 1000 R 2014 is about 16% higher. A Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2017 experiences a loss of 20 USD in one year of ownership. This is offset by a loss of 590 USD for a BMW S 1000 R 2014. Compared to BMW S 1000 R 2014 there are less Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2017 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 4 compared to 19. It takes less time to sell a Triumph Street Triple 765 RS with 67 days compared to 70 days for a BMW S 1000 R. Since model year 2017 1000PS.de editors have written 26 reviews for the Triumph Street Triple 765 RS and 62 reviews for the BMW S 1000 R since model year 2014. The first review for the Triumph Street Triple 765 RS was published on 1/10/2017 and now has more than 58,400 views. This compares to more than 17,300 views for the first review on BMW S 1000 R published on 11/3/2013.


















