Husaberg TE 300 2012 vs. Gas Gas EC 300 2010
Husaberg TE 300 2012
Gas Gas EC 300 2010
Преглед - Husaberg TE 300 2012 vs Gas Gas EC 300 2010
The Husaberg TE 300 2012 and the Gas Gas EC 300 2010 are both enduro motorcycles with similar engine specifications. They both have a bore and stroke of 72 mm and a single cylinder engine. However, there are some notable differences between the two models.
In terms of the engine and drive train, the Husaberg TE 300 2012 has the advantage of having both electric and kick starters, providing convenience and reliability. On the other hand, the Gas Gas EC 300 2010 only has a kick starter. The Husaberg TE 300 2012 also has a slightly smaller displacement of 293.2 ccm compared to the Gas Gas EC 300 2010's 297 ccm.
Husaberg TE 300 2012
When it comes to the chassis, the Husaberg TE 300 2012 features a central tube frame type, while the Gas Gas EC 300 2010 has a Deltabox frame type. Both frame types have their own advantages and disadvantages, with the central tube offering simplicity and solidity, and the Deltabox providing strength and rigidity.
In terms of dimensions and weights, the two motorcycles have similar front tire diameters of 21 inches and rear tire widths of 140 mm. However, the Husaberg TE 300 2012 has a slightly larger rear tire diameter of 18 inches compared to the Gas Gas EC 300 2010's 18 inches. The wheelbase of the two motorcycles is also similar, with the Husaberg TE 300 2012 measuring at 1475 mm and the Gas Gas EC 300 2010 at 1476 mm. The seat height of the Husaberg TE 300 2012 is higher at 985 mm compared to the Gas Gas EC 300 2010's 945 mm. The dry weight of the two motorcycles is almost identical, with the Husaberg TE 300 2012 weighing 103 kg and the Gas Gas EC 300 2010 weighing 102 kg. The fuel tank capacity of the Husaberg TE 300 2012 is slightly larger at 11 liters compared to the Gas Gas EC 300 2010's 9.5 liters.
In terms of strengths, the Husaberg TE 300 2012 has a very wide range of applications and features simple but solid two-stroke technology. On the other hand, the Gas Gas EC 300 2010 has a wide range of features including a classy Öhlins shock, FMF exhaust, and Wave brake discs. It also has a powerful engine.
Gas Gas EC 300 2010
As for weaknesses, the Husaberg TE 300 2012 does not have any listed weaknesses. However, the Gas Gas EC 300 2010 is noted to be very expensive.
In conclusion, both the Husaberg TE 300 2012 and the Gas Gas EC 300 2010 have their own strengths and weaknesses. The Husaberg TE 300 2012 offers a wide range of applications and solid two-stroke technology, while the Gas Gas EC 300 2010 boasts a variety of features and a powerful engine. Ultimately, the choice between the two would depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.
Техничке спецификације Husaberg TE 300 2012 у поређењу са Gas Gas EC 300 2010
За и против у поређењу
За и против у поређењу
Husaberg TE 300 2012
TE 300 var och är en favorit, även i den nya generationen. Oavsett om det är en specialsträcka, smala skogstrial eller ändlösa branta stigningar, är TE300 aldrig malplacerad. Helt enkelt en cykel som du inte kan göra fel med.
Gas Gas EC 300 2010
Även standardmodellen är övertygande med svart plast och de ädla, rödanodiserade gaffelrören. Racing Edition, som är 300 euro dyrare, levereras med Öhlins och FMF i en vacker svart, vit och guldfärgad finish. För alla som behöver något särskilt elegant lanserar GasGas Christophe Nambotin Edition för att hedra förra årets SixDays-vinnare.
Поређење цена Просечна тржишна цена Husaberg TE 300 vs Gas Gas EC 300
There are a few key differences between a Husaberg TE 300 2012 and a Gas Gas EC 300 2010. It takes less time to sell a Husaberg TE 300 with 41 days compared to 61 days for a Gas Gas EC 300. Since model year 2011 1000PS.de editors have written 2 reviews for the Husaberg TE 300 and 12 reviews for the Gas Gas EC 300 since model year 2005. The first review for the Husaberg TE 300 was published on 7/7/2010 and now has more than 17,600 views. This compares to more than 9,200 views for the first review on Gas Gas EC 300 published on 8/21/2006.
