Yamaha XSR900 2016 vs. Kawasaki Z900 2017

The Yamaha XSR900 2016 and the Kawasaki Z900 2017 are both naked bikes with similar technical specifications. However, there are some notable differences between the two models.

In terms of engine power, the Kawasaki Z900 2017 has a slight advantage with 125.4 HP compared to the Yamaha XSR900 2016's 115 HP. The Kawasaki also has a higher torque of 98.6 Nm compared to the Yamaha's 87.5 Nm. This means that the Kawasaki may offer slightly better acceleration and overall performance.

Both bikes have in-line engines with liquid cooling, but the Yamaha XSR900 2016 has a 3-cylinder engine while the Kawasaki Z900 2017 has a 4-cylinder engine. The larger displacement of the Kawasaki at 948 ccm compared to the Yamaha's 847 ccm may also contribute to its higher power output.

Yamaha XSR900 2016

In terms of suspension, both bikes have upside-down telescopic forks at the front and swing arm suspension with a monoshock at the rear. This setup provides good stability and handling for both models.

The chassis of the Yamaha XSR900 2016 is made of aluminum and has a twin tube frame, while the Kawasaki Z900 2017 has a steel frame with a double cradle design. The choice of materials and frame design may affect the overall weight and handling characteristics of the bikes.

Both bikes have double disk brakes at the front with similar diameters of 298 mm for the Yamaha and 300 mm for the Kawasaki. This ensures good stopping power and control in various riding conditions. Additionally, both models come with ABS as standard, providing added safety and confidence during braking.

In terms of dimensions, the Yamaha XSR900 2016 and the Kawasaki Z900 2017 have similar front and rear tire widths and diameters. However, the Kawasaki has a slightly longer wheelbase at 1450 mm compared to the Yamaha's 1440 mm. The seat height of the Yamaha is also slightly higher at 815 mm compared to the Kawasaki's 795 mm.

Kawasaki Z900 2017

In terms of strengths, the Yamaha XSR900 2016 is praised for its powerful engine, well-tuned riding modes, and the inclusion of ABS and TC as standard. It also has an authentic modern design and clean workmanship. On the other hand, the Kawasaki Z900 2017 is commended for its ingenious naked bike chassis, superb looks, and a responsive engine with perfectly dimensioned torque. It is also considered to be an optimal intersection of performance, price, and practical use.

In terms of weaknesses, the Yamaha XSR900 2016 is criticized for its hard chassis and a seat that could be more comfortable. Additionally, some may find the speedblock design to be repetitive, as it is already present on many other Yamaha models. The Kawasaki Z900 2017 is noted to have a narrow knee angle, which may be uncomfortable for taller riders. However, this can be addressed by ordering a different seat.

Overall, both the Yamaha XSR900 2016 and the Kawasaki Z900 2017 are impressive naked bikes with their own unique strengths and weaknesses. Riders should consider their personal preferences and priorities to determine which model suits them best.