KTM 1090 Adventure 2017 vs. Honda CRF1000L Africa Twin 2016

The KTM 1090 Adventure 2017 and the Honda CRF1000L Africa Twin 2016 are both powerful and capable enduro motorcycles. The KTM 1090 Adventure boasts a V engine type with a bore of 103 mm and a stroke of 63 mm, producing an impressive 125 HP of engine power and 109 Nm of torque. On the other hand, the Honda CRF1000L Africa Twin features an in-line engine type with a bore of 92 mm and a stroke of 75.1 mm, delivering 95 HP of engine power and 98 Nm of torque.

In terms of starter and transmission, both motorcycles are equipped with an electric starter and a chain transmission system. They also share a similar suspension setup, with an upside-down telescopic fork in the front and a swing arm suspension with a monoshock in the rear. However, the KTM 1090 Adventure utilizes WP suspension components, while the Honda CRF1000L Africa Twin features Showa suspension components.

When it comes to the chassis, the KTM 1090 Adventure utilizes a chromium-molybdenum frame, while the Honda CRF1000L Africa Twin features a steel frame. In terms of braking, both motorcycles are equipped with double disk brakes in the front, with the KTM 1090 Adventure using Brembo brakes and the Honda CRF1000L Africa Twin using Nissin brakes.

KTM 1090 Adventure 2017

In terms of advanced rider assistance systems, both motorcycles are equipped with ABS and traction control. The KTM 1090 Adventure also offers riding modes, providing the rider with different performance settings for various riding conditions.

In terms of dimensions and weights, the KTM 1090 Adventure has a front tire diameter of 19 inches and a rear tire diameter of 17 inches, while the Honda CRF1000L Africa Twin has a front tire diameter of 21 inches and a rear tire diameter of 18 inches. Both motorcycles have a rear tire width of 150 mm. The wheelbase of the KTM 1090 Adventure is 1560 mm, slightly shorter than the 1575 mm wheelbase of the Honda CRF1000L Africa Twin. Both motorcycles have a seat height of 850 mm.

In terms of weight, the KTM 1090 Adventure has a dry weight (with ABS) of 205 kg and a kerb weight (with ABS) of 228 kg. On the other hand, the Honda CRF1000L Africa Twin has a dry weight (with ABS) of 212 kg and a kerb weight (with ABS) of 232 kg. Both motorcycles have a fuel tank capacity of around 23 liters for the KTM 1090 Adventure and 18.8 liters for the Honda CRF1000L Africa Twin.

Now, let's discuss the strengths and weaknesses of each motorcycle. The KTM 1090 Adventure 2017 is known for its very powerful and cultivated engine with a wide rev range. It offers performance modes, allowing the rider to customize the bike's performance to their preferences. The ABS can be switched off for more advanced riders, and the adjustable traction control provides added safety. The KTM 1090 Adventure also offers agile and safe handling, adjustable ergonomics, a height-adjustable windshield, and comparatively low weight. Additionally, it is priced relatively lower compared to other models.

Honda CRF1000L Africa Twin 2016

On the other hand, the Honda CRF1000L Africa Twin 2016 is highly regarded for its excellent and pleasant driving experience. The engine revs up nicely, and the bike handles exceptionally well, both on and off-road. It is particularly suitable for traveling and offers a unique DCT dual-clutch transmission, providing smooth and effortless gear changes.

However, the KTM 1090 Adventure does have a couple of weaknesses. Its aesthetics may seem outdated compared to the newer 1290 Super Adventures, and the suspension fork is not adjustable. On the other hand, the Honda CRF1000L Africa Twin's engine may be considered unspectacular compared to its competitors.

In conclusion, both the KTM 1090 Adventure 2017 and the Honda CRF1000L Africa Twin 2016 are formidable enduro motorcycles with their own strengths and weaknesses. The KTM 1090 Adventure offers a more powerful engine and a lower price point, while the Honda CRF1000L Africa Twin provides an excellent riding experience and a unique dual-clutch transmission system. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.