Husqvarna SM 610 2005 vs. Husqvarna SM 511 R 2012

Husqvarna SM 610 2005

Husqvarna SM 610 2005

Husqvarna SM 511 R 2012

Husqvarna SM 511 R 2012

Loading...

Technical Specifications Husqvarna SM 610 2005 compared to Husqvarna SM 511 R 2012

Husqvarna SM 610 2005
Husqvarna SM 511 R 2012

Motor i pogonski sustav

PrijenosPrijenosLanacPrijenosLanac
CilindriCilindri1Cilindri1
TaktTaktČetverotaktniTaktČetverotaktni
PomakPomak576 ccmPomak477 ccm

Dimenzije i težina

Međuosovinski razmakMeđuosovinski razmak1,500 mmMeđuosovinski razmak1,460 mm
Visina sjedalaVisina sjedala920 mmVisina sjedala915 mm
Težina s praznim spremnicima za tekućineTežina s praznim spremnicima za tekućine140 kgTežina s praznim spremnicima za tekućine118 kg
Kapacitet spremnika za gorivoKapacitet spremnika za gorivo12.5 l (nisko)Kapacitet spremnika za gorivo8.5 l (nisko)

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Husqvarna SM 610 2005

Husqvarna SM 610 2005

The Husky is by no means an inexpensive entry-level bike. However, single-cylinder enthusiasts looking for power, a great chassis and civil service intervals have come to the right place with the Husky. A good iron!

Optimal chassis

independent geometry

linear steering feel

high-quality fork

qualitative workmanship.

Hakelige ignition lock seems to have been reworked cheaply

high price

not suitable for long-distance travel

spare parts supply problematic.

Husqvarna SM 511 R 2012

Husqvarna SM 511 R 2012

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

Alternative Comparisons