Husqvarna SM 610 2005 vs. Husaberg FE 570 2009

Husqvarna SM 610 2005

Husqvarna SM 610 2005

Husaberg FE 570 2009

Husaberg FE 570 2009

Loading...

Technical Specifications Husqvarna SM 610 2005 compared to Husaberg FE 570 2009

Husqvarna SM 610 2005
Husaberg FE 570 2009

Motor i pogonski sustav

PrijenosPrijenosLanacPrijenosLanac
CilindriCilindri1Cilindri1
TaktTaktČetverotaktniTaktČetverotaktni
PomakPomak576 ccmPomak565.5 ccm

Dimenzije i težina

Međuosovinski razmakMeđuosovinski razmak1,500 mmMeđuosovinski razmak1,475 mm
Visina sjedalaVisina sjedala920 mmVisina sjedala985 mm
Težina s praznim spremnicima za tekućineTežina s praznim spremnicima za tekućine140 kgTežina s praznim spremnicima za tekućine114 kg
Kapacitet spremnika za gorivoKapacitet spremnika za gorivo12.5 l (nisko)Kapacitet spremnika za gorivo8.5 l (nisko)

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Husqvarna SM 610 2005

Husqvarna SM 610 2005

The Husky is by no means an inexpensive entry-level bike. However, single-cylinder enthusiasts looking for power, a great chassis and civil service intervals have come to the right place with the Husky. A good iron!

Optimal chassis

independent geometry

linear steering feel

high-quality fork

qualitative workmanship.

Hakelige ignition lock seems to have been reworked cheaply

high price

not suitable for long-distance travel

spare parts supply problematic.

Husaberg FE 570 2009

Husaberg FE 570 2009

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

Alternative Comparisons