Kawasaki ER-6f 2009 vs. Kawasaki ER-6n 2006

Kawasaki ER-6f 2009

Kawasaki ER-6f 2009

Kawasaki ER-6n 2006

Kawasaki ER-6n 2006

Loading...

Technical Specifications Kawasaki ER-6f 2009 compared to Kawasaki ER-6n 2006

Kawasaki ER-6f 2009
Kawasaki ER-6n 2006

Motor i pogonski sustav

Snaga motoraSnaga motora72 KSSnaga motora72 KS
CilindriCilindri2Cilindri2
TaktTaktČetverotaktniTaktČetverotaktni
HlađenjeHlađenjetekućinaHlađenjetekućina
PomakPomak649 ccmPomak649 ccm

Dimenzije i težina

Visina sjedalaVisina sjedala785 mmVisina sjedala785 mm
Težina s praznim spremnicima za tekućineTežina s praznim spremnicima za tekućine204 kgTežina s praznim spremnicima za tekućine179 kg
Kapacitet spremnika za gorivoKapacitet spremnika za gorivo15.5 l (nisko)Kapacitet spremnika za gorivo15.5 l (nisko)
Sukladnost licenceSukladnost licenceASukladnost licenceA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Kawasaki ER-6f 2009

Kawasaki ER-6f 2009

Regardless of whether you take it on the dull way to work or on extended tours, the comfortable seating position, the quiet, low-vibration in-line two-cylinder and the agility in the angular movement bring riding pleasure in every situation.

Powerful sound

mobility

reasonable price

visually sophisticated

safe riding experience

(re-)beginner-friendly.

72 hp does not tear legs out

Kawasaki ER-6n 2006

Kawasaki ER-6n 2006

Kawasaki doesn't build toys. The ER-6N is getting more serious - and remains beginner-friendly.

Lightness

precision

rideability

modern, dynamic look

beginner-friendly

trustworthy ergonomics

ABS.

Sitting position with regard to the footrests uncomfortable from 1.80m

hardly suitable for wheelies

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Kawasaki ER-6f vs Kawasaki ER-6n

Price Kawasaki ER-6f

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Kawasaki ER-6n

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons