BMW R 1200 GS 2016 vs. Triumph Tiger 800 XC 2014
BMW R 1200 GS 2016
Triumph Tiger 800 XC 2014
Vue d’ensemble - BMW R 1200 GS 2016 vs Triumph Tiger 800 XC 2014
The BMW R 1200 GS 2016 is equipped with a Boxer engine, which provides a powerful performance. With a bore of 101 mm and a stroke of 73 mm, this engine delivers 125 HP of power and 125 Nm of torque. The transmission is a prop shaft, which ensures smooth and efficient power delivery. The bike has 2 cylinders and a displacement of 1170 ccm.
In terms of suspension, the BMW R 1200 GS 2016 features a strut front suspension, which offers a comfortable and stable ride. The frame is made of steel and has a twin tube, load-bearing engine design, providing strength and stability.
The dimensions and weights of the BMW R 1200 GS 2016 include a 19-inch front tire diameter, a 170 mm rear tire width, and a 17-inch rear tire diameter. The wheelbase measures 1507 mm and the seat height is 850 mm. The fuel tank capacity is 20 liters.
The strengths of the BMW R 1200 GS 2016 include its powerful engine, low fuel consumption, comfortable seating position, and the ability to be used off-road. Additionally, the bike has a high reputation in the market.
BMW R 1200 GS 2016
However, the BMW R 1200 GS 2016 does have some weaknesses. Firstly, it has a long and expensive surcharge side, which may deter some potential buyers. Secondly, the Telelever front suspension can take some getting used to for riders accustomed to traditional suspensions. Lastly, the brakes on this model are reported to be very sharp, requiring careful handling.
On the other hand, the Triumph Tiger 800 XC 2014 is equipped with an in-line engine, which provides a lively performance. With a bore of 74 mm and a stroke of 61.9 mm, this engine delivers 95 HP of power and 79 Nm of torque. The transmission is a chain, which offers a direct and responsive power delivery. The bike has 3 cylinders and a displacement of 799 ccm.
In terms of suspension, the Triumph Tiger 800 XC 2014 features an upside-down telescopic fork front suspension, which offers a sporty yet comfortable ride. The frame is made of steel and has a tubular design, providing strength and durability.
Triumph Tiger 800 XC 2014
The dimensions and weights of the Triumph Tiger 800 XC 2014 include a 21-inch front tire diameter, a 150 mm rear tire width, and a 17-inch rear tire diameter. The wheelbase measures 1545 mm and the seat height is 845 mm. The fuel tank capacity is 19 liters.
The strengths of the Triumph Tiger 800 XC 2014 include its lively engine, sporty yet comfortable chassis, and its easy handling. Additionally, the bike offers lots of practical benefits and has a great price/performance ratio.
However, the Triumph Tiger 800 XC 2014 does have some weaknesses. Firstly, it has a spartan dashboard, which may not be as visually appealing as some competitors. Secondly, the on-board computer cannot be operated from the end of the handlebar, which may be inconvenient for some riders. Lastly, the wind/weather protection on this model is reported to be not as effective as desired.
In conclusion, the BMW R 1200 GS 2016 and the Triumph Tiger 800 XC 2014 are both capable enduro motorcycles with their own strengths and weaknesses. The BMW offers a more powerful engine and a comfortable seating position, while the Triumph provides a lively engine and a sporty yet comfortable chassis. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.
Caractéristiques techniques BMW R 1200 GS 2016 par rapport à Triumph Tiger 800 XC 2014
Avantages et inconvénients en comparaison
Avantages et inconvénients en comparaison
BMW R 1200 GS 2016
Une GS est à l'aise presque partout - mais sur la piste de course, elle ne l'est que dans une certaine mesure. C'est un plaisir de ressentir la puissance du bicylindre boxer partiellement refroidi par eau à la sortie des virages - 125 ch ne semblent que sur le papier beaucoup plus faibles que 150 ou même 160 ch chez la concurrence. Avec un couple de 125 Newton-mètres, l'attaque par le bas est de toute façon magnifique et la GS, avec ses 238 kilos prête à rouler, ne traîne pas trop de poids malgré son allure imposante. Dans les virages très serrés, le centre de gravité bas a un effet positif - la BMW R 1200 GS est très difficile à casser ! Même la suspension avant Telelever, qui supprime le tangage de la roue avant lors du freinage, s'adapte parfaitement à l'ensemble de la GS et ne peut que légèrement atténuer son caractère sportif.
Triumph Tiger 800 XC 2014
La Tiger 800 XC ne me plaît pas seulement sur la route pour mes trajets quotidiens vers le travail. C'est un véhicule très simple qui, grâce à son moteur puissant et pétillant, est non seulement très utile mais aussi très amusant. Sur la piste de course, je n'utilisais le véhicule que pour mes activités d'instructeur. Mais je n'ai pas pu m'en empêcher et j'ai dû prendre la piste dans le groupe le plus rapide. Le châssis de haute qualité et le moteur agile m'ont également procuré du plaisir et la Tiger 800 XC est pour moi LE talent universel par excellence.
Comparaison des prix Prix moyen du marché BMW R 1200 GS vs Triumph Tiger 800 XC
There are a few key differences between a BMW R 1200 GS 2016 and a Triumph Tiger 800 XC 2014. There are the same number of bikes of both models available on the 1000PS.de marketplace, specifically 47. It takes less time to sell a Triumph Tiger 800 XC with 48 days compared to 70 days for the BMW R 1200 GS. Since model year 2005 1000PS.de editors have written 98 reviews for the BMW R 1200 GS and 16 reviews for the Triumph Tiger 800 XC since model year 2011. The first review for the BMW R 1200 GS was published on 1/20/2004 and now has more than 19,100 views. This compares to more than 8,200 views for the first review on Triumph Tiger 800 XC published on 11/1/2010.
