KTM 690 Duke 2013 vs. Yamaha MT-07 2016
KTM 690 Duke 2013
Yamaha MT-07 2016
Vue d’ensemble - KTM 690 Duke 2013 vs Yamaha MT-07 2016
The KTM 690 Duke 2013 and the Yamaha MT-07 2016 are both popular naked bikes with their own unique features and strengths.
Starting with the KTM 690 Duke 2013, it boasts a lightweight design, weighing in at only 149.5 kg. This light weight contributes to its agility and maneuverability, making it a joy to ride in city traffic or on twisty roads. The bike is powered by a single-cylinder engine with 68 HP and 70 Nm of torque, providing sufficient power for most riding situations. Additionally, the liquid cooling system ensures optimal engine performance even in hot weather conditions. The 690ccm displacement further adds to its power and performance.
KTM 690 Duke 2013
In terms of suspension, the KTM 690 Duke 2013 features an Upside-Down telescopic fork, which provides excellent handling and stability. The frame is made of chromium-molybdenum, ensuring durability and strength. The front and rear tyres have a width of 120 mm and 160 mm respectively, with a diameter of 17 inches. The wheelbase measures at 1466 mm, offering stability and control. The seat height is 835 mm, which may be a bit high for shorter riders. The fuel tank capacity is 14 liters, allowing for decent range between refueling stops.
Moving on to the Yamaha MT-07 2016, it has a slightly higher engine power of 75 HP, generated by a twin-cylinder engine. The torque is slightly lower at 68 Nm, but still provides ample power for most riding situations. Like the KTM, it features a liquid cooling system and a displacement of 689ccm.
The Yamaha MT-07 2016 is praised for its very agile engine and easy handling, making it a great choice for riders of all skill levels. The bike is also relatively lightweight, weighing in at 179 kg. Its aggressively angular look adds to its appeal, giving it a sporty and modern aesthetic. The powerful brakes ensure excellent stopping power, adding to the overall safety of the bike. The seating position is comfortable, allowing for long rides without discomfort. The display is extensive and easy to read, providing all the necessary information to the rider.
Yamaha MT-07 2016
However, the Yamaha MT-07 2016 does have some weaknesses. The chassis is a little soft, which may affect the bike's stability at higher speeds or during aggressive cornering. The footrests may also drag on the ground, limiting the bike's lean angle. Additionally, some plastic parts on the bike may feel cheap and not as durable. The telescopic fork is considered by some to be boring and lacking in performance compared to other suspension systems.
In conclusion, the KTM 690 Duke 2013 and the Yamaha MT-07 2016 are both solid choices in the naked bike category. The KTM offers a lightweight design, sufficient power, and low consumption. On the other hand, the Yamaha provides a very agile engine, easy handling, and a comfortable seating position. Both bikes have their own strengths and weaknesses, so it ultimately comes down to personal preference and riding style.
Caractéristiques techniques KTM 690 Duke 2013 par rapport à Yamaha MT-07 2016
Avantages et inconvénients en comparaison
Avantages et inconvénients en comparaison
KTM 690 Duke 2013
Plus d'une décennie après son lancement, la KTM 690 Duke reste une moto fascinante au caractère original. La tentative de faire de la Duke rebelle une moto plus grand public s'est avérée être une stratégie gagnante. La combinaison d'un moteur LC4 supérieur, d'une maniabilité directe et d'un bon rapport qualité-prix en fait toujours une option attrayante pour les pilotes qui recherchent l'originalité. Bien que les modèles bicylindres plus récents soient supérieurs en termes de fluidité et de confort, la 690 Duke offre une immédiateté et un caractère que seul un gros monocylindre peut fournir. En tant que moto d'occasion, elle s'est révélée étonnamment stable en termes de valeur et de longévité - à condition de veiller à un entretien régulier.
Yamaha MT-07 2016
Même après trois ans, la Yamaha MT-07 est toujours considérée comme la favorite du public. Personne d'autre ne propose un tel rapport qualité-prix. Le bicylindre est puissant, mais son dosage est très doux à bas régime. L'écran est également l'un des meilleurs de sa catégorie grâce à sa bonne lisibilité. Seul le châssis déçoit. En conduite sportive, il est tout simplement configuré de manière trop souple, ce qui fait que la MT-07 peut parfois se cabrer.
Comparaison des prix Prix moyen du marché KTM 690 Duke vs Yamaha MT-07
There are a few key differences between a KTM 690 Duke 2013 and a Yamaha MT-07 2016. In terms of price, the actual average price of a Yamaha MT-07 2016 is about 17% higher. A KTM 690 Duke 2013 experiences a loss of 200 USD in one year and 610 USD in two years of ownership. This is offset by a loss of 390 USD and 710 USD for a Yamaha MT-07 2016. Compared to Yamaha MT-07 2016 there are less KTM 690 Duke 2013 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 9 compared to 24. It takes less time to sell a Yamaha MT-07 with 51 days compared to 60 days for the KTM 690 Duke. Since model year 2008 1000PS.de editors have written 29 reviews for the KTM 690 Duke and 69 reviews for the Yamaha MT-07 since model year 2013. The first review for the KTM 690 Duke was published on 9/28/2007 and now has more than 14,800 views. This compares to more than 12,600 views for the first review on Yamaha MT-07 published on 11/4/2013.
