Yamaha XSR900 2016 vs. Kawasaki Z900 2020
Yamaha XSR900 2016
Kawasaki Z900 2020
Vue d’ensemble - Yamaha XSR900 2016 vs Kawasaki Z900 2020
The Yamaha XSR900 2016 and the Kawasaki Z900 2020 are both naked bikes with similar engine types and cooling systems. However, there are several notable differences between the two models.
In terms of engine power, the Kawasaki Z900 2020 has a slight advantage with 125.4 HP compared to the Yamaha XSR900 2016's 115 HP. Similarly, the Kawasaki Z900 2020 also has a higher torque of 98.6 Nm compared to the Yamaha XSR900 2016's 87.5 Nm. This difference in power and torque may result in a more exhilarating riding experience on the Kawasaki Z900 2020.
Another difference lies in the number of cylinders. The Yamaha XSR900 2016 has a 3-cylinder engine, while the Kawasaki Z900 2020 has a 4-cylinder engine. Generally, more cylinders provide smoother power delivery and better overall performance.
Both models feature upside-down telescopic forks for the front suspension and swing arm with a monoshock for the rear suspension. This ensures good handling and stability on both bikes.
Yamaha XSR900 2016
In terms of chassis, the Yamaha XSR900 2016 features an aluminum frame with a twin tube design, while the Kawasaki Z900 2020 has a steel frame with a double cradle design. The choice of materials and frame design may affect the overall weight and stiffness of the bike, potentially influencing its handling characteristics.
Both bikes have double disk brakes at the front with similar diameters, ensuring reliable stopping power. Additionally, both models come equipped with ABS as standard, providing an added level of safety.
In terms of dimensions and weights, the Yamaha XSR900 2016 has a slightly shorter wheelbase of 1440 mm compared to the Kawasaki Z900 2020's 1450 mm. The seat height of the Yamaha XSR900 2016 is also slightly higher at 815 mm compared to the Kawasaki Z900 2020's 795 mm. However, the Yamaha XSR900 2016 is lighter with a kerb weight of 191 kg compared to the Kawasaki Z900 2020's 210 kg.
Moving on to the strengths of each model, the Yamaha XSR900 2016 is praised for its greedy engine, well-tuned riding modes, and the inclusion of ABS and TC as standard. It also receives positive feedback for its authentic modern design and clean workmanship.
Kawasaki Z900 2020
On the other hand, the Kawasaki Z900 2020 is commended for its powerful four-cylinder engine, great handling, and good equipment. It is also noted for its aggressive looks and value for money.
However, there are also weaknesses associated with each model. The Yamaha XSR900 2016 is criticized for its hard chassis and the seat, which could be more comfortable. Additionally, the speedblock design of the bike is already present on many other models, potentially making it less unique.
The Kawasaki Z900 2020, on the other hand, has a menu navigation system that some riders find tiring to navigate. Furthermore, it lacks the option for a quickshifter, which could be a disadvantage for riders who prefer seamless gear shifts.
In conclusion, both the Yamaha XSR900 2016 and the Kawasaki Z900 2020 have their own strengths and weaknesses. The Yamaha XSR900 2016 offers a greedy engine and well-tuned riding modes, while the Kawasaki Z900 2020 boasts a powerful four-cylinder engine and great handling. Ultimately, the choice between the two models will depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.
Caractéristiques techniques Yamaha XSR900 2016 par rapport à Kawasaki Z900 2020
Avantages et inconvénients en comparaison
Avantages et inconvénients en comparaison
Yamaha XSR900 2016
La Yamaha XSR900 est une illusion d'optique classique - avec son phare rond, son réservoir anguleux et son feu arrière rapporté, elle passe clairement pour une moto rétro. Mais ce n'est pas un hasard si ses performances rappellent celles de la puissante moto tout terrain de classe moyenne Yamaha MT-09, car celle-ci constitue la base extrêmement sportive de la XSR900. Le moteur est donc une merveille et les freins sont très puissants. En ce qui concerne le châssis, les techniciens n'exagèrent heureusement pas, la XSR900 offre suffisamment de confort et la position d'assise droite est plus confortable que ne le laisserait supposer le moteur puissant. Dans la catégorie des motos rétro, la XSR900 est néanmoins l'un des modèles les plus sportifs.
Kawasaki Z900 2020
La Kawasaki Z900 n'est peut-être plus tout à fait à la hauteur en ce qui concerne les caractéristiques électroniques modernes dépendant de l'inclinaison, mais elle est relativement bon marché et il ne faut surtout pas sous-estimer la communauté des fans du bon vieux quatre cylindres en ligne - la Z900 est l'une des possibilités les plus avantageuses de posséder un moteur aussi formidable d'une cylindrée d'à peine un litre dans une naked bike sportive ! Le poids plus élevé est perceptible, mais pas massivement gênant, car la maniabilité et la stabilité sont tout à fait correctes. En ce qui concerne l'électronique "dépassée", le plus dérangeant est l'absence d'assistant de changement de vitesse, qui n'est même pas disponible en option. Mais dans l'ensemble, la Z900 est une superbe moto naked avec un excellent rapport qualité-prix.
Comparaison des prix Prix moyen du marché Yamaha XSR900 vs Kawasaki Z900
There are a few key differences between a Yamaha XSR900 2016 and a Kawasaki Z900 2020. In terms of price, the actual average price of a Kawasaki Z900 2020 is about 31% higher. Compared to Kawasaki Z900 2020 there are less Yamaha XSR900 2016 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 5 compared to 34. It takes less time to sell a Yamaha XSR900 with 77 days compared to 124 days for a Kawasaki Z900. Since model year 2016 1000PS.de editors have written 30 reviews for the Yamaha XSR900 and 46 reviews for the Kawasaki Z900 since model year 2017. The first review for the Yamaha XSR900 was published on 11/25/2015 and now has more than 17,600 views. This compares to more than 93,200 views for the first review on Kawasaki Z900 published on 11/11/2016.
