Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011 vs. Triumph Speed Triple R 2016
Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011
Triumph Speed Triple R 2016
Vue d’ensemble - Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011 vs Triumph Speed Triple R 2016
The Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011 and the Triumph Speed Triple R 2016 are both naked bikes with similar technical specifications. Both models have an inline three-cylinder engine with a displacement of 1050cc and liquid cooling. However, there are some notable differences between the two models.
In terms of engine power, the Speed Triple R 2016 has a slight advantage with 140 HP compared to the Speed Triple 1050 2011's 132 HP. The torque is also slightly higher in the Speed Triple R 2016, with 112 Nm compared to the Speed Triple 1050 2011's 110 Nm. These differences may not be significant, but they contribute to the overall performance of the bikes.
Both models have a three-cylinder engine, which provides a unique and powerful riding experience. The Speed Triple R 2016 is particularly praised for its engine, which is known for its brute power and distinctive sound. The Speed Triple 1050 2011 also has a hard sound, which adds to its character.
Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011
In terms of suspension, the Speed Triple R 2016 has an advantage with Öhlins components, both in the front and rear. These suspension components offer better adjustability, with compression, preload, and rebound adjustments available. On the other hand, the Speed Triple 1050 2011 has Showa suspension components, which also offer compression and rebound adjustments but may not be as refined as Öhlins.
Both models have an aluminum frame with a twin-tube design, providing a stable and controlled chassis. The braking system is also similar, with four-piston radial brakes in the front. However, the Speed Triple R 2016 has the added advantage of monoblock technology, which enhances braking performance.
In terms of dimensions and weights, both models have the same front and rear tire width and diameter. The wheelbase is also similar, with only a 2mm difference. However, the seat height is slightly lower in the Speed Triple R 2016, with 825mm compared to the Speed Triple 1050 2011's 828mm. The fuel tank capacity is also slightly lower in the Speed Triple R 2016, with 15.5 liters compared to the Speed Triple 1050 2011's 17.5 liters.
Triumph Speed Triple R 2016
In terms of strengths, the Speed Triple 1050 2011 is praised for its controlled chassis, hard sound, and stability. On the other hand, the Speed Triple R 2016 is known for its powerful and unique three-cylinder engine, brute brakes, well-functioning electronic features, excellent Öhlins suspension components, and traditional look.
In terms of weaknesses, the Speed Triple 1050 2011 is criticized for its rough gearing, which can sometimes disturb the harmony between the rider and the machine. The Speed Triple R 2016, on the other hand, is noted for its somewhat sluggish handling and the higher surcharge for the R version.
Overall, both the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011 and the Triumph Speed Triple R 2016 are impressive naked bikes with their own strengths and weaknesses. The Speed Triple R 2016 offers some upgrades and improvements over the 2011 model, particularly in terms of engine power, suspension components, and electronic features. However, the 2011 model still holds its own with its controlled chassis and hard sound. Ultimately, the choice between the two models will depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.
Caractéristiques techniques Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011 par rapport à Triumph Speed Triple R 2016
Avantages et inconvénients en comparaison
Avantages et inconvénients en comparaison
Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011
C'est là que même une Super Duke se retrouve à l'étroit, lorsque les virages ne sont pas trop serrés et que la KTM peut pleinement exploiter sa maniabilité radicale et sa capacité de correction dans le rayon, inégalée sur les motos naked. Car la Speed Triple est plus harmonieuse, plus patiente et plus prévisible. La Duke doit être battue, la Triple peut aussi être caressée.
Triumph Speed Triple R 2016
Comme son prédécesseur, la Speed Triple R séduit par son châssis Öhlins haut de gamme et sensible, ainsi que par son look époustouflant. Le design reste fidèle à sa ligne - ce qui ne peut que réjouir les nombreux fans. On peut difficilement se plaindre du freinage et de la réactivité du moteur, mais on peut tout à fait lui pardonner son manque de puissance sur la concurrence et sa maniabilité un peu lente, après tout, la Speed Triple est un classique avec une histoire et son design est légendaire - ce qui est bien plus important pour les vrais fans que quelques chevaux supplémentaires.
Comparaison des prix Prix moyen du marché Triumph Speed Triple 1050 vs Triumph Speed Triple R
There are a few key differences between a Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011 and a Triumph Speed Triple R 2016. There are the same number of bikes of both models available on the 1000PS.de marketplace, specifically 6. It takes less time to sell a Triumph Speed Triple 1050 with 77 days compared to 120 days for a Triumph Speed Triple R. Since model year 2005 1000PS.de editors have written 29 reviews for the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 and 16 reviews for the Triumph Speed Triple R since model year 2012. The first review for the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 was published on 10/2/2007 and now has more than 16,200 views. This compares to more than 11,100 views for the first review on Triumph Speed Triple R published on 10/24/2011.
