Yamaha XSR900 2016 vs. Triumph Speed Triple S 2016
Yamaha XSR900 2016
Triumph Speed Triple S 2016
Vue d’ensemble - Yamaha XSR900 2016 vs Triumph Speed Triple S 2016
The Yamaha XSR900 2016 and the Triumph Speed Triple S 2016 are both naked bikes with similar engine types, in line three-cylinder engines. However, there are several differences between the two models.
In terms of engine power, the Triumph Speed Triple S 2016 has a clear advantage with 140 HP compared to the Yamaha XSR900 2016's 115 HP. The Triumph also has a higher torque of 112 Nm compared to the Yamaha's 87.5 Nm. This means that the Triumph will likely offer more acceleration and power on the road.
Both bikes have liquid cooling systems and three cylinders, which provide smooth and efficient performance. They also have similar suspension setups, with upside-down telescopic forks at the front and monoshock absorbers at the rear. The chassis on both bikes is made of aluminum and has a twin tube design, providing strength and stability.
Yamaha XSR900 2016
In terms of braking, the Triumph Speed Triple S 2016 has larger front discs with a diameter of 320 mm compared to the Yamaha XSR900 2016's 298 mm discs. This may result in better braking performance and shorter stopping distances for the Triumph.
In terms of dimensions and weights, the two bikes are quite similar. The Yamaha has a slightly longer wheelbase of 1440 mm compared to the Triumph's 1435 mm. The seat height on the Yamaha is also slightly lower at 815 mm compared to the Triumph's 825 mm. However, the Triumph is heavier, weighing 214 kg compared to the Yamaha's 188 kg. The Yamaha also has a slightly smaller fuel tank capacity of 14 liters compared to the Triumph's 15.5 liters.
Triumph Speed Triple S 2016
When it comes to strengths, the Yamaha XSR900 2016 has a greedy engine, well-tuned riding modes, and ABS and TC as standard features. It also has an authentic modern design and clean workmanship. On the other hand, the Triumph Speed Triple S 2016 has a distinctive three-cylinder engine with a unique sound, a distinctive look, good brakes, a sporty seating position, and a well-functioning electronics package.
In terms of weaknesses, the Yamaha XSR900 2016 has a hard chassis, and the seat could be more comfortable. Additionally, the speedblock design is already present on many other Yamaha models, which may make it less unique. The Triumph Speed Triple S 2016, on the other hand, could have a more responsive engine at the bottom end and may have somewhat sluggish handling.
Overall, the Triumph Speed Triple S 2016 offers more power and a slightly better braking system compared to the Yamaha XSR900 2016. However, the Yamaha has a lower weight and a slightly more comfortable seat. Both bikes have their own strengths and weaknesses, and the choice between them will depend on individual preferences and priorities.
Caractéristiques techniques Yamaha XSR900 2016 par rapport à Triumph Speed Triple S 2016
Avantages et inconvénients en comparaison
Avantages et inconvénients en comparaison
Yamaha XSR900 2016
La XSR900 allie les performances d'un streetfighter sportif à l'esthétique d'un naked bike rétro aux finitions soignées. Pour ce faire, les Japonais se servent de leur propre histoire, qui se trouve concentrée et sans faille dans les archives de l'agence de design travaillant depuis 60 ans pour Yamaha. Elle reprend les vertus de la MT-09 et a corrigé quelques-unes de ses faiblesses. Elle se conduit de manière plus harmonieuse, plus contrôlée et, si on le souhaite, plus détendue. Seul le confort, et donc le pilote, souffre de la fermeté du châssis sur les mauvaises routes. Il faut être capable de souffrir un tout petit peu avec un néo-classique.
Triumph Speed Triple S 2016
La Speed Triple reste fidèle à sa ligne dans sa dernière génération - une moto naked délicieusement affûtée, qui marque le style streetfighter comme peu d'autres modèles. Pour la piste de course, elle n'a qu'un intérêt limité - bien sûr, le moteur trois cylindres rugissant de 140 ch procure énormément de plaisir et le châssis ne présente pas de grosses faiblesses, mais il existe une Speed Triple R avec des éléments de suspension Öhlins, qui se sent naturellement plus à l'aise sur la piste de course. Dans l'ensemble, la Speed Triple S est un excellent chasseur de routes, qui a également beaucoup à offrir sur le plan esthétique.
Comparaison des prix Prix moyen du marché Yamaha XSR900 vs Triumph Speed Triple S
There are a few key differences between a Yamaha XSR900 2016 and a Triumph Speed Triple S 2016. There are the same number of bikes of both models available on the 1000PS.de marketplace, specifically 5. It takes less time to sell a Yamaha XSR900 with 77 days compared to 93 days for a Triumph Speed Triple S. Since model year 2016 1000PS.de editors have written 30 reviews for the Yamaha XSR900 and 6 reviews for the Triumph Speed Triple S since model year 2016. The first review for the Yamaha XSR900 was published on 11/25/2015 and now has more than 17,600 views. This compares to more than 10,300 views for the first review on Triumph Speed Triple S published on 10/23/2011.
