KTM 690 Duke 2013 vs. Kawasaki Z650 2020
KTM 690 Duke 2013
Kawasaki Z650 2020
Vue d’ensemble - KTM 690 Duke 2013 vs Kawasaki Z650 2020
The KTM 690 Duke 2013 and the Kawasaki Z650 2020 are both popular naked bikes that offer unique features and performance capabilities.
Starting with the KTM 690 Duke 2013, one of its main strengths is its light weight, weighing in at just 149.5 kg. This makes it highly maneuverable and agile, perfect for city riding and quick turns. Additionally, it boasts a sufficient power output of 68 HP, providing ample acceleration and speed. The bike also has a low consumption rate, making it fuel-efficient and cost-effective for daily use.
On the other hand, the Kawasaki Z650 2020 stands out with its powerful two-cylinder engine, delivering 68.2 HP. This provides a thrilling riding experience with strong acceleration and high top speeds. Another standout feature is the aggressive intake noise, adding to the overall excitement and sportiness of the bike. The Z650 also offers compact dimensions, making it easy to handle and maneuver in tight spaces. Additionally, it has a low seat height of 790 mm, making it accessible for riders of all heights.
KTM 690 Duke 2013
In terms of chassis and suspension, the KTM 690 Duke 2013 features an upside-down telescopic fork front suspension, providing stability and control on various road surfaces. The frame is made of chromium-molybdenum, ensuring durability and strength. However, one weakness of the KTM 690 Duke is that it does not offer any chassis adjustment options, limiting customization and fine-tuning for individual preferences. Additionally, the bike may lack in comfort, especially on longer rides.
In comparison, the Kawasaki Z650 2020 has a telescopic fork front suspension, offering a comfortable and smooth ride. The frame is made of steel, providing stability and rigidity. The Z650 also features a stable chassis, allowing for confident cornering and handling. However, some riders have reported issues with the front brake pressure point, which may require adjustments for optimal performance. Additionally, taller riders may find the bike uncomfortable due to its lower seat height.
Both bikes come with advanced rider assistance systems. The KTM 690 Duke 2013 is equipped with Ride by Wire technology, enhancing throttle response and control. On the other hand, the Kawasaki Z650 2020 features ABS, ensuring safe and effective braking in various conditions.
Kawasaki Z650 2020
In terms of dimensions and weights, both bikes have similar front and rear tire widths and diameters. The KTM 690 Duke 2013 has a slightly longer wheelbase of 1466 mm compared to the Kawasaki Z650 2020's 1410 mm. The seat height of the KTM 690 Duke is 835 mm, while the Z650 has a lower seat height of 790 mm. The KTM 690 Duke 2013 is significantly lighter with a kerb weight of 149.5 kg, while the Kawasaki Z650 2020 weighs 185 kg. Both bikes have a decent fuel tank capacity, with the KTM 690 Duke holding 14 liters and the Z650 holding 15 liters.
In terms of additional features, the Kawasaki Z650 2020 stands out with its TFT display, offering connectivity options and a modern look. It also has a more grown-up appearance compared to the KTM 690 Duke 2013. However, some riders have reported that the Rideology App is not as sophisticated as expected.
In conclusion, the KTM 690 Duke 2013 and the Kawasaki Z650 2020 are both impressive naked bikes with their own strengths and weaknesses. The KTM 690 Duke offers a lightweight and fuel-efficient option with sufficient power, while the Kawasaki Z650 delivers a powerful two-cylinder engine and aggressive styling. It ultimately comes down to personal preferences and priorities when choosing between these two models.
Caractéristiques techniques KTM 690 Duke 2013 par rapport à Kawasaki Z650 2020
Avantages et inconvénients en comparaison
Avantages et inconvénients en comparaison
KTM 690 Duke 2013
Plus d'une décennie après son lancement, la KTM 690 Duke reste une moto fascinante au caractère original. La tentative de faire de la Duke rebelle une moto plus grand public s'est avérée être une stratégie gagnante. La combinaison d'un moteur LC4 supérieur, d'une maniabilité directe et d'un bon rapport qualité-prix en fait toujours une option attrayante pour les pilotes qui recherchent l'originalité. Bien que les modèles bicylindres plus récents soient supérieurs en termes de fluidité et de confort, la 690 Duke offre une immédiateté et un caractère que seul un gros monocylindre peut fournir. En tant que moto d'occasion, elle s'est révélée étonnamment stable en termes de valeur et de longévité - à condition de veiller à un entretien régulier.
Kawasaki Z650 2020
En 2021, la Kawasaki Z 650 sera toujours synonyme de conduite facile, avec une belle allure et de bonnes options. Tant la hauteur de selle que le moteur sont très accessibles et procureront beaucoup de plaisir aux pilotes expérimentés comme aux novices. Ceux qui recherchent une moto naked honnête et sans grandes surprises trouveront ici leur bonheur. En raison de ses dimensions compactes, il est toutefois conseillé de faire un essai avant l'achat et peut-être d'opter pour la selle surélevée.
Comparaison des prix Prix moyen du marché KTM 690 Duke vs Kawasaki Z650
There are a few key differences between a KTM 690 Duke 2013 and a Kawasaki Z650 2020. In terms of price, the actual average price of a Kawasaki Z650 2020 is about 25% higher. A KTM 690 Duke 2013 experiences a loss of 200 USD in one year of ownership. This is offset by a loss of 30 USD for a Kawasaki Z650 2020. Compared to Kawasaki Z650 2020 there are less KTM 690 Duke 2013 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 9 compared to 21. It takes less time to sell a KTM 690 Duke with 60 days compared to 80 days for a Kawasaki Z650. Since model year 2008 1000PS.de editors have written 29 reviews for the KTM 690 Duke and 31 reviews for the Kawasaki Z650 since model year 2017. The first review for the KTM 690 Duke was published on 9/28/2007 and now has more than 14,800 views. This compares to more than 25,000 views for the first review on Kawasaki Z650 published on 11/8/2016.
