BMW S 1000 RR 2019 vs. Aprilia RSV4 RR 2016
BMW S 1000 RR 2019
Aprilia RSV4 RR 2016
Vue d’ensemble - BMW S 1000 RR 2019 vs Aprilia RSV4 RR 2016
The BMW S 1000 RR 2019 and the Aprilia RSV4 RR 2016 are both high-performance supersport motorcycles that offer impressive specifications and features.
Starting with the engine and drive train, the BMW S 1000 RR 2019 is equipped with an inline 4-cylinder engine with a displacement of 999cc, producing 207 horsepower and 113 Nm of torque. On the other hand, the Aprilia RSV4 RR 2016 features a V4 engine with a displacement of 999.6cc, delivering 201 horsepower and 115 Nm of torque. Both motorcycles have DOHC valves and offer strong power delivery, but the BMW S 1000 RR has a slightly higher power output.
In terms of suspension, both motorcycles feature upside-down telescopic forks at the front and a monoshock absorber at the rear. The chassis of both bikes is made of aluminum, providing stability and agility on the road.
BMW S 1000 RR 2019
When it comes to braking, both motorcycles are equipped with double disc brakes at the front. However, the BMW S 1000 RR 2019 features radial technology, while the Aprilia RSV4 RR 2016 has radial and monoblock technology. This indicates that the braking performance of the Aprilia may be slightly better.
In terms of advanced rider assistance systems, both motorcycles offer ABS, quickshifter, and traction control. The BMW S 1000 RR 2019 also includes additional features such as riding modes, launch control, and ride by wire. The Aprilia RSV4 RR 2016 offers anti-wheelie control, which is not present in the BMW S 1000 RR.
In terms of dimensions and weights, the BMW S 1000 RR 2019 has a front tire width of 120mm and a rear tire width of 190mm, while the Aprilia RSV4 RR 2016 has a front tire width of 120mm and a rear tire width of 200mm. The wheelbase of the BMW S 1000 RR is slightly longer at 1441mm compared to the 1420mm of the Aprilia RSV4 RR. The seat height of the BMW S 1000 RR is 824mm, while the Aprilia RSV4 RR has a slightly higher seat height of 845mm. The fuel tank capacity of the BMW S 1000 RR is 16.5 liters, whereas the Aprilia RSV4 RR has a larger fuel tank capacity of 18.5 liters.
In terms of strengths, the BMW S 1000 RR 2019 offers a very linear power delivery, making it more controllable and faster for most riders. It also has a wide rev range and pleasant dosing. The new DDC (Dynamic Damping Control) of the RR works even more precisely, offering top performance. The motorcycle also has a super electronics package and an excellent shift assistant. Additionally, it has a more active and sportier seating position, and high-quality details such as the frame, swingarm, and display.
Aprilia RSV4 RR 2016
On the other hand, the Aprilia RSV4 RR 2016 has a compact and extremely powerful V4 engine, providing a strong character. It also has a stable chassis and an independent look. The motorcycle is equipped with traction control and power modes, enhancing its performance.
In terms of weaknesses, the BMW S 1000 RR 2019 may have lost a certain amount of "thrill" due to its linear power delivery. Some riders may find it almost "too perfect." Additionally, the menu navigation of the motorcycle may take some time to get used to. On the other hand, the Aprilia RSV4 RR 2016 may be a little small for tall riders, and its design is very stiff.
Overall, both the BMW S 1000 RR 2019 and the Aprilia RSV4 RR 2016 are impressive supersport motorcycles with their own strengths and weaknesses. The BMW S 1000 RR offers a more refined and controllable riding experience, while the Aprilia RSV4 RR provides a powerful and distinctive character.
Caractéristiques techniques BMW S 1000 RR 2019 par rapport à Aprilia RSV4 RR 2016
Avantages et inconvénients en comparaison
Avantages et inconvénients en comparaison
BMW S 1000 RR 2019
La nouvelle BMW S 1000 RR 2019 est une supersports entièrement nouvelle. Elle est devenue nettement plus compacte et surtout plus légère. La machine est incroyablement facile à piloter et donne presque l'impression d'être une 600 par rapport au modèle précédent ! La position d'assise et l'ensemble des réglages de la machine sont devenus nettement plus sportifs, mais ils peuvent être appliqués sur l'asphalte de manière beaucoup plus conviviale grâce au package électronique nettement amélioré, au poids économisé et, last but not least, au déploiement de puissance presque linéaire du moteur - Bravo ! Un bémol subsiste malheureusement : si l'on veut profiter au maximum des nouveautés, il faut malheureusement cocher un maximum de cases chez le concessionnaire. Mais en contrepartie, tu peux créer ta propre BMW !
Aprilia RSV4 RR 2016
L'Aprilia se distingue de la foule par sa sonorité V4 unique, qui ressemble plus à un bicylindre qu'à un quatre cylindres en ligne criard. On se sent tout de suite à l'aise sur la RSV4 RR et on peut d'emblée prendre de bonnes inclinaisons sans avoir à tâtonner. La maniabilité est très agréable, même si on est perché assez haut. Elle est un peu trop compacte pour les grands pilotes. Par rapport à son prédécesseur, elle est plus facile à conduire, mais en même temps nettement plus puissante et plus rapide. Elle marque des points, surtout en entrée de virage, avec un excellent feedback de la roue avant.
Comparaison des prix Prix moyen du marché BMW S 1000 RR vs Aprilia RSV4 RR
There are a few key differences between a BMW S 1000 RR 2019 and a Aprilia RSV4 RR 2016. In terms of price, the actual average price of a BMW S 1000 RR 2019 is about 32% higher. Compared to Aprilia RSV4 RR 2016 there are more BMW S 1000 RR 2019 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 11 compared to 4. It takes less time to sell a BMW S 1000 RR with 63 days compared to 199 days for a Aprilia RSV4 RR. Since model year 2010 1000PS.de editors have written 135 reviews for the BMW S 1000 RR and 8 reviews for the Aprilia RSV4 RR since model year 2015. The first review for the BMW S 1000 RR was published on 4/16/2008 and now has more than 4,000 views. This compares to more than 51,900 views for the first review on Aprilia RSV4 RR published on 11/21/2014.
