Kawasaki Z900 2018 vs. Triumph Speed Triple R 2012
Kawasaki Z900 2018
Triumph Speed Triple R 2012
Overview - Kawasaki Z900 2018 vs Triumph Speed Triple R 2012
The Kawasaki Z900 2018 and the Triumph Speed Triple R 2012 are both naked bikes with similar engine types, liquid cooling, and four-piston double disk front brakes. However, there are several key differences between the two models.
In terms of engine power, the Triumph Speed Triple R 2012 has a slight advantage with 135 HP compared to the Kawasaki Z900 2018's 125.4 HP. Similarly, the Speed Triple R has higher torque at 111 Nm compared to the Z900's 98.6 Nm. The Speed Triple R also has a larger displacement at 1050ccm compared to the Z900's 948ccm.
When it comes to suspension, the Z900 2018 features an upside-down telescopic fork at the front with preload and rebound adjustment, while the Speed Triple R 2012 has a telescopic fork with compression, preload, and rebound adjustment. Both models have rear suspension with compression, preload, and rebound adjustment.
Kawasaki Z900 2018
In terms of chassis, the Z900 2018 has a steel double cradle frame, while the Speed Triple R 2012 has an aluminum twin tube frame. This difference in frame material may result in variations in weight and handling characteristics.
Both bikes have double disk front brakes with four pistons, but the Speed Triple R 2012 features radial, monoblock technology, which may offer improved braking performance compared to the Z900 2018's petal technology.
In terms of tire dimensions, the Z900 2018 has a front tire width of 120 mm and a rear tire width of 180 mm, while the Speed Triple R 2012 has a front tire width of 120 mm and a rear tire width of 190 mm. Both models have 17-inch front and rear tire diameters.
The Z900 2018 has a slightly longer wheelbase at 1450 mm compared to the Speed Triple R 2012's 1435 mm. The seat height of the Z900 2018 is lower at 795 mm compared to the Speed Triple R 2012's 825 mm. The Z900 2018 also has a slightly lower kerb weight with ABS at 210 kg compared to the Speed Triple R 2012's 212 kg.
Triumph Speed Triple R 2012
In terms of strengths, the Z900 2018 is praised for its powerful and smooth engine, great sound, sharp and sporty look, low seating position, and easy handling and manoeuvrability. On the other hand, the Speed Triple R 2012 is commended for its flawless racing chassis, precise handling, inspiring looks, great engine, and stable brakes.
However, both models have their weaknesses. The Z900 2018 lacks traction control, which may be a disadvantage for riders seeking additional safety features. Additionally, tall riders may find the knee angle strenuous during long rides. The Speed Triple R 2012, on the other hand, requires wider radii when turning and may be somewhat complicated to ride in turns. It also has weaknesses in terms of comfort.
In conclusion, the Kawasaki Z900 2018 and the Triumph Speed Triple R 2012 are both impressive naked bikes with their own strengths and weaknesses. The Z900 2018 offers a powerful engine, sporty look, and easy handling, while the Speed Triple R 2012 excels in its racing chassis, precise handling, and great engine. Ultimately, the choice between the two models will depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.
Technical Specifications Kawasaki Z900 2018 compared to Triumph Speed Triple R 2012
Pros and Cons in comparison
Pros and Cons in comparison
Kawasaki Z900 2018
Dans le segment très concurrentiel des naked bikes, la Z900 joue dans la cour des grands. Son moteur, en particulier, est absolument grandiose, incroyablement soyeux et offre une puissance élevée à tous les régimes - comme il se doit pour un quatre cylindres japonais. Son look sportif et agressif s'y prête bien. Elle renonce aux fioritures électroniques, mais offre néanmoins une grande sécurité dans les virages, au freinage et en sortie d'accélération. La selle basse profite surtout aux petits pilotes, mais les grands pilotes pourraient regretter un angle du genou plus plat sur les longs trajets. Le faible poids et la compacité de la Z900 la rendent particulièrement maniable et facile à manier. Un canon sportif dont le prix est également très attractif
Triumph Speed Triple R 2012
La R se comporte avec plus de précision et de calme que jamais. Elle est garantie de garder son sang-froid même lorsque son pilote l'a peut-être déjà jetée au loin. L'inconvénient de ce concentré de puissance compact est que les rayons doivent être un peu plus larges et le parcours un peu plus rapide pour que la véritable reine d'Angleterre puisse jouer de ses 4 as dans la manche.
Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Kawasaki Z900 vs Triumph Speed Triple R
There are a few key differences between a Kawasaki Z900 2018 and a Triumph Speed Triple R 2012. There are the same number of bikes of both models available on the 1000PS.de marketplace, specifically 55. It takes less time to sell a Triumph Speed Triple R with 78 days compared to 112 days for the Kawasaki Z900. Since model year 2017 1000PS.de editors have written 46 reviews for the Kawasaki Z900 and 16 reviews for the Triumph Speed Triple R since model year 2012. The first review for the Kawasaki Z900 was published on 11/11/2016 and now has more than 93,200 views. This compares to more than 11,100 views for the first review on Triumph Speed Triple R published on 10/24/2011.
