Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2013 vs. Suzuki Bandit 650 2005
Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2013
Suzuki Bandit 650 2005
Vue d’ensemble - Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2013 vs Suzuki Bandit 650 2005
The Triumph Street Triple 675 R model year 2013 and the Suzuki Bandit 650 model year 2005 are both naked bikes that offer unique features and specifications.
Starting with the Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2013, it boasts a powerful engine with 106 HP, which is significantly higher than the Suzuki Bandit 650's 78 HP. The Street Triple also has a 3-cylinder engine, while the Bandit has a 4-cylinder engine. In terms of cooling, the Street Triple utilizes liquid cooling, whereas the Bandit relies on oil-air cooling.
In terms of displacement, the Street Triple has a slightly larger engine with a displacement of 675ccm, compared to the Bandit's 656ccm. This difference in displacement may result in varying performance levels and torque output between the two bikes.
Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2013
Moving on to dimensions and weights, the Street Triple has a wheelbase of 1410mm, slightly shorter than the Bandit's 1440mm. This could potentially affect the handling and stability of the bikes. The seat height of the Street Triple is 800mm, while the Bandit offers a slightly lower seat height of 770mm.
Another difference lies in the fuel tank capacity, with the Street Triple having a capacity of 17.4 liters, while the Bandit offers a larger capacity of 20 liters. This means that the Bandit may have a longer range before needing to refuel.
Suzuki Bandit 650 2005
In terms of strengths, the Street Triple is praised for its taut and playful chassis, agility, low weight, powerful brakes, and overall comfort. On the other hand, the Bandit is commended for its good workmanship, clean engine tuning, ample power, and adjustable suspension.
However, the Street Triple does have a weakness in its brake application, which can be a bit abrupt towards the end. The Bandit, on the other hand, does not have any specific weaknesses mentioned.
In conclusion, while both bikes have their own unique strengths and weaknesses, the Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2013 stands out with its higher engine power, taut chassis, and agile handling. On the other hand, the Suzuki Bandit 650 2005 offers good workmanship, ample power, and adjustable suspension. Ultimately, the choice between the two would depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.
Caractéristiques techniques Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2013 par rapport à Suzuki Bandit 650 2005
Avantages et inconvénients en comparaison
Avantages et inconvénients en comparaison
Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2013
La Street Triple 675 R est idéale pour ceux qui recherchent une naked bike poussive de milieu de gamme, qui procure surtout du plaisir sur les routes de campagne en conduite sportive. Pour savoir si le supplément de prix raisonnable pour la version R est rentable, il faut décider si l'on souhaite vraiment régler la suspension ou si on la laisse de toute façon dans le réglage de base bien choisi.
Suzuki Bandit 650 2005
Certaines étapes sinueuses deviennent de magnifiques épreuves spéciales. Il est rassurant de savoir qu'il n'est pas nécessaire d'avoir une GSX-R 1000 à 15 000 euros pour s'amuser correctement dans les épingles. Les virages ont été pris avec force, les freinages tardifs et les accélérations précoces. Un bon moment de détente entre amis.
Comparaison des prix Prix moyen du marché Triumph Street Triple 675 R vs Suzuki Bandit 650
There are a few key differences between a Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2013 and a Suzuki Bandit 650 2005. It takes less time to sell a Suzuki Bandit 650 with 45 days compared to 52 days for the Triumph Street Triple 675 R. Since model year 2009 1000PS.de editors have written 16 reviews for the Triumph Street Triple 675 R and 6 reviews for the Suzuki Bandit 650 since model year 2005. The first review for the Triumph Street Triple 675 R was published on 7/20/2008 and now has more than 13,000 views. This compares to more than 45,100 views for the first review on Suzuki Bandit 650 published on 2/6/2005.
