BMW S 1000 R 2014 vs. BMW R nineT Scrambler 2016
BMW S 1000 R 2014
BMW R nineT Scrambler 2016
Vue d’ensemble - BMW S 1000 R 2014 vs BMW R nineT Scrambler 2016
The BMW S 1000 R 2014 and the BMW R nineT Scrambler 2016 are both naked bikes from BMW, but they have some key differences in terms of their technical specifications and strengths.
In terms of their engine and drive train, the BMW S 1000 R 2014 has an in-line engine with 160 HP of power and 112 Nm of torque. It has four cylinders and a displacement of 999 ccm. On the other hand, the BMW R nineT Scrambler 2016 has a boxer engine with 110 HP of power and 119 Nm of torque. It has two cylinders and a displacement of 1170 ccm. The S 1000 R has a slightly more powerful engine, but the R nineT Scrambler has a unique character with its boxer engine that includes vibrations, power, and sound.
In terms of suspension, the S 1000 R has an upside-down telescopic fork in the front and a swing arm in the rear. The R nineT Scrambler has a telescopic fork in the front and a paralever suspension in the rear. Both bikes have double disk brakes in the front with radial technology.
BMW S 1000 R 2014
In terms of their chassis, the S 1000 R has an aluminum frame with a twin tube design, while the R nineT Scrambler has a steel frame with a tubular design. The S 1000 R is slightly lighter with a kerb weight of 207 kg compared to the R nineT Scrambler's 220 kg.
In terms of dimensions, the S 1000 R has a wheelbase of 1439 mm and a seat height of 814 mm. The R nineT Scrambler has a longer wheelbase of 1527 mm and a slightly higher seat height of 820 mm. Both bikes have a front tire width of 120 mm and a front tire diameter of 17 inches. The S 1000 R has a wider rear tire with a width of 190 mm compared to the R nineT Scrambler's 170 mm. Both bikes have a rear tire diameter of 17 inches.
BMW R nineT Scrambler 2016
In terms of their strengths, the S 1000 R is known for its sporty chassis, extreme power and performance, and very good electronic helpers. It offers a terrific price/performance ratio and is fast and comfortable on the racetrack and on country roads. On the other hand, the R nineT Scrambler has a boxer engine with character, including vibrations, power, and sound. It has a comfortable chassis and a pleasant seating position. It also has powerful brakes and cool looks. Additionally, the R nineT Scrambler is much cheaper than the R nineT.
In terms of weaknesses, the S 1000 R has a slightly rough engine running and the Dynamic suspension control (DDC) can be on the "hard" side overall. The seat is relatively high and the design is a matter of taste. On the other hand, the R nineT Scrambler has a rather hard saddle and spartan dashboards, with the base model lacking a rev counter and gear indicator.
Overall, the BMW S 1000 R 2014 and the BMW R nineT Scrambler 2016 are both impressive naked bikes with their own unique strengths and weaknesses. The S 1000 R offers extreme power and performance, while the R nineT Scrambler has a characterful boxer engine and a more affordable price. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.
Caractéristiques techniques BMW S 1000 R 2014 par rapport à BMW R nineT Scrambler 2016
Avantages et inconvénients en comparaison
Avantages et inconvénients en comparaison
BMW S 1000 R 2014
Une puissance brutale, une électronique douce, presque parfaite, il n'y a que la HP4 pour faire mieux. Après les superbikes, BMW domine désormais la catégorie des nakedbikes de 1000 cm3.
BMW R nineT Scrambler 2016
Il est inutile d'essayer de comprendre pourquoi la R nineT est si populaire, le concept est manifestement parfaitement adapté à notre époque. Reste à savoir si ce style rétro moderne fonctionnera également avec la BMW R nineT Scrambler, une catégorie de prix plus basse. Mais la condition préalable est très bonne, le Scrambler fait confiance au même "vieux" moteur boxer à refroidissement par air, que BMW a miraculeusement rendu compatible avec l'Euro4 sans perte de performance ni de caractère. Le châssis est plus souple, l'empattement plus long et les caractéristiques plus spartiates - mais sous le nom de code Scrambler, cela est tout à fait acceptable, après tout, la conduite confortable est au premier plan. La selle unipersonnelle en option est certes un peu dure, mais la R nineT Scrambler n'est en aucun cas inconfortable, c'est surtout la position d'assise qui convainc pleinement. Celui qui peut vivre avec moins d'options, de l'acier au lieu de l'aluminium et des éléments de suspension plus simples, économise beaucoup d'argent avec la Scrambler - qu'il peut ensuite investir dans un customisation individuelle !
Comparaison des prix Prix moyen du marché BMW S 1000 R vs BMW R nineT Scrambler
There are a few key differences between a BMW S 1000 R 2014 and a BMW R nineT Scrambler 2016. In terms of price, the actual average price of a BMW R nineT Scrambler 2016 is about 17% higher. A BMW S 1000 R 2014 experiences a loss of 590 USD in one year and 610 USD in two years of ownership. This is offset by a loss of 2,270 USD and 2,410 USD for a BMW R nineT Scrambler 2016. Compared to BMW R nineT Scrambler 2016 there are more BMW S 1000 R 2014 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 19 compared to 11. It takes less time to sell a BMW S 1000 R with 70 days compared to 97 days for a BMW R nineT Scrambler. Since model year 2014 1000PS.de editors have written 62 reviews for the BMW S 1000 R and 16 reviews for the BMW R nineT Scrambler since model year 2016. The first review for the BMW S 1000 R was published on 11/3/2013 and now has more than 17,300 views. This compares to more than 40,200 views for the first review on BMW R nineT Scrambler published on 7/5/2016.
