Triumph Speed Triple S 2016 vs. BMW K 1300 R 2009
Triumph Speed Triple S 2016
BMW K 1300 R 2009
Vue d’ensemble - Triumph Speed Triple S 2016 vs BMW K 1300 R 2009
The Triumph Speed Triple S 2016 and the BMW K 1300 R 2009 are both naked bikes with similar engine types and front and rear suspension setups. However, there are several key differences between the two models.
In terms of engine power, the BMW K 1300 R 2009 takes the lead with 173 HP compared to the Triumph Speed Triple S 2016's 140 HP. The BMW also has a higher torque of 140 Nm compared to the Triumph's 112 Nm. This means that the BMW offers more power and torque, which can result in a more thrilling and exhilarating riding experience.
In terms of displacement, the BMW K 1300 R 2009 has a larger engine with a displacement of 1293 ccm, while the Triumph Speed Triple S 2016 has a displacement of 1050 ccm. This means that the BMW has a larger engine capacity, which can contribute to its higher power and torque output.
Triumph Speed Triple S 2016
Both bikes have double disk brakes with four pistons at the front, ensuring good braking performance and control. They also have the same front and rear tire diameters of 17 inches, providing stability and grip on the road.
When it comes to dimensions and weights, the BMW K 1300 R 2009 has a longer wheelbase of 1585 mm compared to the Triumph Speed Triple S 2016's 1435 mm. This longer wheelbase can contribute to better stability and handling at higher speeds. However, the Triumph has a slightly lower seat height of 825 mm compared to the BMW's 820 mm, which may be more comfortable for shorter riders.
In terms of fuel tank capacity, the BMW K 1300 R 2009 has a larger tank with a capacity of 19 liters, while the Triumph Speed Triple S 2016 has a smaller tank with a capacity of 15.5 liters. This means that the BMW can potentially offer a longer riding range before needing to refuel.
In terms of strengths, the Triumph Speed Triple S 2016 has a distinctive three-cylinder engine with a unique sound, along with a distinctive look and good brakes. It also offers a sporty seating position and a well-functioning electronics package.
BMW K 1300 R 2009
On the other hand, the BMW K 1300 R 2009 has a sharp and attractive design, plenty of power, and a comfortable and relaxed ride. It also features an optimized system with ABS, RDC, EVO, ASC, and ESA 2, which can enhance safety and performance.
However, the Triumph Speed Triple S 2016 does have some weaknesses. The engine could be more responsive at the bottom end, and the handling can feel somewhat sluggish. On the other hand, the BMW K 1300 R 2009 may have a curve settling-in period at the beginning, which can affect the bike's initial performance.
In conclusion, the BMW K 1300 R 2009 offers more power, torque, and a larger fuel tank capacity compared to the Triumph Speed Triple S 2016. It also features an optimized system with advanced safety and performance features. However, the Triumph has a distinctive engine sound, a unique look, and a well-functioning electronics package. Ultimately, the choice between the two models will depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.
Caractéristiques techniques Triumph Speed Triple S 2016 par rapport à BMW K 1300 R 2009
Avantages et inconvénients en comparaison
Avantages et inconvénients en comparaison
Triumph Speed Triple S 2016
La Speed Triple reste fidèle à sa ligne dans sa dernière génération - une moto naked délicieusement affûtée, qui marque le style streetfighter comme peu d'autres modèles. Pour la piste de course, elle n'a qu'un intérêt limité - bien sûr, le moteur trois cylindres rugissant de 140 ch procure énormément de plaisir et le châssis ne présente pas de grosses faiblesses, mais il existe une Speed Triple R avec des éléments de suspension Öhlins, qui se sent naturellement plus à l'aise sur la piste de course. Dans l'ensemble, la Speed Triple S est un excellent chasseur de routes, qui a également beaucoup à offrir sur le plan esthétique.
BMW K 1300 R 2009
On ouvre la poignée des gaz, la K pousse vers l'avant et ensuite, quand on s'accorde une petite pause sur d'autres motos, on reste tout simplement à fond sur l'accélérateur avec la K relookée et on enfonce le rapport suivant. Une vraie merveille pour les courses exigeantes.
Comparaison des prix Prix moyen du marché Triumph Speed Triple S vs BMW K 1300 R
There are a few key differences between a Triumph Speed Triple S 2016 and a BMW K 1300 R 2009. It takes less time to sell a BMW K 1300 R with 81 days compared to 93 days for the Triumph Speed Triple S. Since model year 2016 1000PS.de editors have written 6 reviews for the Triumph Speed Triple S and 7 reviews for the BMW K 1300 R since model year 2009. The first review for the Triumph Speed Triple S was published on 10/23/2011 and now has more than 10,300 views. This compares to more than 20,400 views for the first review on BMW K 1300 R published on 10/9/2008.
