BMW R 1200 R 2014 vs. BMW S 1000 R 2016
BMW R 1200 R 2014
BMW S 1000 R 2016
Vue d’ensemble - BMW R 1200 R 2014 vs BMW S 1000 R 2016
The BMW R 1200 R 2014 is a naked bike with a sporty look and a powerful engine. It is equipped with a Boxer engine that produces 110 HP and 119 Nm of torque. The bike has a displacement of 1170 ccm and features a two-cylinder configuration. The front suspension is a Telelever system, while the rear suspension is a Paralever system. The frame type is a load-bearing engine, providing stability and strength. The front brakes are double disk with four pistons and radial technology. The front tire has a width of 120 mm and a diameter of 17 inches, while the rear tire has a width of 180 mm and a diameter of 17 inches. The seat height is 800 mm and the fuel tank capacity is 18 liters. The BMW R 1200 R 2014 comes with ABS and traction control as standard, as well as two riding modes.
On the other hand, the BMW S 1000 R 2016 is also a naked bike with a powerful and well-controllable engine. It features an inline engine that produces 160 HP and 112 Nm of torque. The bike has a displacement of 999 ccm and features a four-cylinder configuration. The front suspension is an upside-down telescopic fork, while the rear suspension is a swing arm system. The frame type is a twin tube, providing rigidity and stability. The front brakes are double disk with four pistons and radial technology, similar to the BMW R 1200 R 2014. The front tire has a width of 120 mm and a diameter of 17 inches, while the rear tire has a width of 190 mm and a diameter of 17 inches. The seat height is slightly higher than the BMW R 1200 R 2014, at 814 mm, and the fuel tank capacity is slightly lower, at 17.5 liters. The BMW S 1000 R 2016 also offers a comfortable seating position.
BMW R 1200 R 2014
In terms of strengths, the BMW R 1200 R 2014 has a sporty look and a powerful engine. It also offers a good sound and a comfortable seating position. The bike comes with ABS and traction control as standard, providing added safety. Additionally, it offers two riding modes, allowing the rider to choose between different performance settings.
On the other hand, the BMW S 1000 R 2016 has a powerful and well-controllable engine. It also features a powerful braking system, ensuring excellent stopping power. The bike offers a comfortable seating position, allowing the rider to enjoy long rides without discomfort.
In terms of weaknesses, the BMW R 1200 R 2014 has many cool features that are only available at extra cost. Additionally, the speedometer and rev counter are poorly readable, which can be inconvenient for the rider.
BMW S 1000 R 2016
On the other hand, the BMW S 1000 R 2016 offers irresistible but expensive optional extras, which can increase the overall cost of the bike. Additionally, the chassis is hard, which can result in a less comfortable ride.
In conclusion, both the BMW R 1200 R 2014 and the BMW S 1000 R 2016 are powerful naked bikes with their own strengths and weaknesses. The BMW R 1200 R 2014 offers a sporty look, a powerful engine, and a comfortable seating position. It comes with ABS and traction control as standard, as well as two riding modes. However, it has additional costs for cool features and poorly readable speedometer and rev counter. On the other hand, the BMW S 1000 R 2016 offers a powerful and well-controllable engine, a powerful braking system, and a comfortable seating position. However, it has expensive optional extras and a hard chassis. Ultimately, the choice between the two models will depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.
Caractéristiques techniques BMW R 1200 R 2014 par rapport à BMW S 1000 R 2016
Avantages et inconvénients en comparaison
Avantages et inconvénients en comparaison
BMW R 1200 R 2014
Le modèle précédent pouvait déjà être conduit de manière sportive et convaincre lors de randonnées, la nouvelle R 1200 R peut faire encore plus - grâce au système de valises (bien sûr payant), les voyages ne posent toujours pas de problème, mais elle maîtrise encore mieux le sport. Grâce au moteur bicylindre boxer désormais partiellement refroidi par eau, elle est merveilleusement agile - 125 ch ne semblent certes pas particulièrement élevés sur le papier, mais le moteur pousse de manière incroyable et se comporte en outre de manière raffinée. Le châssis et les freins marquent également des points et la position d'assise est sportive et droite, ce qui permet de couvrir un large spectre allant du plaisir à la conduite. Malheureusement, BMW a aussi parfaitement compris l'astuce de la liste de prix supplémentaires. Le modèle de base est en effet bien équipé avec l'ABS désactivable, l'antipatinage également désactivable et deux modes de conduite, mais de nombreux gadgets intéressants sont presque obligatoires - et font bien sûr grimper le prix.
BMW S 1000 R 2016
Sur la BMW S 1000 R, on remarque à la fois la parenté étroite avec la Superbike S 1000 RR et la volonté de doter la machine d'un niveau de confort élevé pour la route et le quotidien. Le moteur quatre cylindres de 1000 cm3 se met donc au travail de manière brutale, tout en restant bien contrôlable, et la position de conduite est par conséquent confortable et sportive. Le fait que la S 1000 R soit l'une des power naked bikes les plus abordables est surprenant et réjouissant, mais il ne faut pas pour autant mettre la main sur la liste des équipements spéciaux - car grâce aux nombreuses caractéristiques irrésistibles, elle sera certainement plus chère.
Comparaison des prix Prix moyen du marché BMW R 1200 R vs BMW S 1000 R
There are a few key differences between a BMW R 1200 R 2014 and a BMW S 1000 R 2016. In terms of price, the actual average price of a BMW S 1000 R 2016 is about 33% higher. A BMW R 1200 R 2014 experiences a loss of 1,390 USD in one year and 1,580 USD in two years of ownership. This is offset by a loss of 380 USD and 1,940 USD for a BMW S 1000 R 2016. Compared to BMW S 1000 R 2016 there are less BMW R 1200 R 2014 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 4 compared to 10. It takes less time to sell a BMW R 1200 R with 63 days compared to 69 days for a BMW S 1000 R. Since model year 2007 1000PS.de editors have written 27 reviews for the BMW R 1200 R and 62 reviews for the BMW S 1000 R since model year 2014. The first review for the BMW R 1200 R was published on 7/7/2006 and now has more than 14,900 views. This compares to more than 17,300 views for the first review on BMW S 1000 R published on 11/3/2013.
