BMW S 1000 R 2015 vs. Triumph Speed Triple S 2016
BMW S 1000 R 2015
Triumph Speed Triple S 2016
Vue d’ensemble - BMW S 1000 R 2015 vs Triumph Speed Triple S 2016
The BMW S 1000 R 2015 and the Triumph Speed Triple S 2016 are both naked bikes with similar technical specifications. Both bikes have an inline engine type, with the BMW having a 4-cylinder engine and the Triumph having a 3-cylinder engine. The BMW has a higher engine power of 160 HP compared to the Triumph's 140 HP. Both bikes have the same torque of 112 Nm.
In terms of suspension, both bikes have upside-down telescopic forks in the front and a monoshock in the rear. The BMW has a swing arm suspension in the rear, while the Triumph has a single swing arm suspension. Both bikes have an aluminum frame with a twin tube design.
The braking systems on both bikes are similar, with double disk brakes in the front and four pistons. The brakes on both bikes also use radial technology. The dimensions and weights of both bikes are also similar, with the same front and rear tire widths and diameters. The wheelbase of the BMW is slightly longer at 1439 mm compared to the Triumph's 1435 mm. The seat height of the BMW is also slightly lower at 814 mm compared to the Triumph's 825 mm. The fuel tank capacity of the BMW is 17.5 liters, while the Triumph has a slightly smaller capacity of 15.5 liters.
BMW S 1000 R 2015
In terms of strengths, the BMW S 1000 R 2015 has a powerful and well-controllable engine, making it a strong performer on the road. The bike also has a powerful braking system, providing excellent stopping power. Additionally, the BMW has a comparatively comfortable seating position, allowing for longer rides without discomfort.
On the other hand, the Triumph Speed Triple S 2016 has a distinctive three-cylinder engine with a unique sound, adding to the overall riding experience. The bike also has a distinctive look, making it stand out on the road. The Triumph has good brakes, providing reliable stopping power. The sporty seating position of the Triumph adds to the bike's overall performance, allowing for better control. The Triumph also has a well-functioning electronics package, adding to the bike's overall functionality.
Triumph Speed Triple S 2016
However, both bikes have their weaknesses. The BMW S 1000 R 2015 has some irresistible but expensive optional extras, which may not be affordable for all riders. The bike also has a hard chassis, which may result in a less comfortable ride. Additionally, there may be vibrations in the handlebars, which can be uncomfortable for some riders.
The Triumph Speed Triple S 2016 has a weakness in its engine, which could be more responsive at the bottom end. The bike also has somewhat sluggish handling, which may affect its overall performance.
In conclusion, both the BMW S 1000 R 2015 and the Triumph Speed Triple S 2016 are powerful naked bikes with their own strengths and weaknesses. The BMW offers a powerful engine and comfortable seating position, while the Triumph has a distinctive engine sound and sporty seating position. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.
Caractéristiques techniques BMW S 1000 R 2015 par rapport à Triumph Speed Triple S 2016
Avantages et inconvénients en comparaison
Avantages et inconvénients en comparaison
BMW S 1000 R 2015
Sur la BMW S 1000 R, on remarque à la fois la parenté étroite avec la Superbike S 1000 RR et la volonté de doter la machine d'un niveau de confort élevé pour la route et le quotidien. Le moteur quatre cylindres de 1000 cm3 se met donc au travail de manière brutale, tout en restant bien contrôlable, et la position de conduite est par conséquent confortable et sportive. Le fait que la S 1000 R soit l'une des power naked bikes les plus abordables est surprenant et réjouissant, mais il ne faut pas pour autant mettre la main sur la liste des équipements spéciaux - car grâce aux nombreuses caractéristiques irrésistibles, elle sera certainement plus chère.
Triumph Speed Triple S 2016
La Speed Triple reste fidèle à sa ligne dans sa dernière génération - une moto naked délicieusement affûtée, qui marque le style streetfighter comme peu d'autres modèles. Pour la piste de course, elle n'a qu'un intérêt limité - bien sûr, le moteur trois cylindres rugissant de 140 ch procure énormément de plaisir et le châssis ne présente pas de grosses faiblesses, mais il existe une Speed Triple R avec des éléments de suspension Öhlins, qui se sent naturellement plus à l'aise sur la piste de course. Dans l'ensemble, la Speed Triple S est un excellent chasseur de routes, qui a également beaucoup à offrir sur le plan esthétique.
Comparaison des prix Prix moyen du marché BMW S 1000 R vs Triumph Speed Triple S
There are a few key differences between a BMW S 1000 R 2015 and a Triumph Speed Triple S 2016. There are the same number of bikes of both models available on the 1000PS.de marketplace, specifically 12. It takes less time to sell a BMW S 1000 R with 61 days compared to 93 days for a Triumph Speed Triple S. Since model year 2014 1000PS.de editors have written 62 reviews for the BMW S 1000 R and 6 reviews for the Triumph Speed Triple S since model year 2016. The first review for the BMW S 1000 R was published on 11/3/2013 and now has more than 17,300 views. This compares to more than 10,300 views for the first review on Triumph Speed Triple S published on 10/23/2011.
