Husaberg TE 300 2012 vs. Husqvarna TE 300 2016
Husaberg TE 300 2012
Husqvarna TE 300 2016
Vue d’ensemble - Husaberg TE 300 2012 vs Husqvarna TE 300 2016
The Husaberg TE 300 2012 and the Husqvarna TE 300 2016 are both enduro motorcycles with similar technical specifications. They both have a bore and stroke of 72 mm, an electric and kick starter, a chain transmission, a single cylinder engine, and a displacement of 293.2 ccm. The front suspension is an upside-down telescopic fork from WP, and the rear suspension is also from WP. The frame is made of steel and has a central tube design. They both have a front tire diameter of 21 inches, a rear tire width of 140 mm, a rear tire diameter of 18 inches, a wheelbase of around 1475-1482 mm, a seat height of 960-985 mm, a dry weight of 103-104.6 kg, and a fuel tank capacity of 11 liters.
The Husaberg TE 300 2012 has the advantage of a very wide range of applications, making it suitable for various types of terrain and riding conditions. It also features simple but solid two-stroke technology, which can be easier to maintain and repair compared to more complex four-stroke engines. However, it does not have any specific weaknesses mentioned.
Husaberg TE 300 2012
On the other hand, the Husqvarna TE 300 2016 has several strengths. It is much quieter than the Husaberg TE 300 2012 due to the inclusion of a balancer shaft, which reduces engine vibrations and noise. It also has a powerful engine, providing ample performance for off-road riding. Additionally, it is praised for having the best balance of weight and performance, indicating that it offers a good combination of agility and power.
Husqvarna TE 300 2016
However, one weakness mentioned for the Husqvarna TE 300 2016 is a personal preference for a four-stroke engine on smooth and easy tracks. This suggests that the rider may feel that the two-stroke engine of the Husqvarna TE 300 2016 may not provide the same level of smoothness and ease of use in certain situations.
In summary, both the Husaberg TE 300 2012 and the Husqvarna TE 300 2016 have similar technical specifications and are capable enduro motorcycles. The Husaberg TE 300 2012 is praised for its wide range of applications and simple two-stroke technology, while the Husqvarna TE 300 2016 is commended for its quietness, powerful engine, and balanced weight and performance. However, personal preferences may lead some riders to prefer a four-stroke engine for certain types of tracks.
Caractéristiques techniques Husaberg TE 300 2012 par rapport à Husqvarna TE 300 2016
Avantages et inconvénients en comparaison
Avantages et inconvénients en comparaison
Husaberg TE 300 2012
La TE 300 était et reste une favorite, même dans sa nouvelle génération. Qu'il s'agisse d'une épreuve spéciale, d'un trial étroit en forêt ou d'une interminable montée en pente raide, le TE300 n'est jamais à la mauvaise place. C'est tout simplement une moto avec laquelle on ne peut pas se tromper.
Husqvarna TE 300 2016
Un tout nouveau moteur pour 2017 ! Plus léger et plus silencieux, grâce à l'arbre d'équilibrage. Les deux temps ont également été allégés, le 300 pèse désormais 102 kg sur la balance. Le choix pour l'Erzberg, les Romaniacs et autres !
Comparaison des prix Prix moyen du marché Husaberg TE 300 vs Husqvarna TE 300
There are a few key differences between a Husaberg TE 300 2012 and a Husqvarna TE 300 2016. It takes less time to sell a Husaberg TE 300 with 41 days compared to 76 days for a Husqvarna TE 300. Since model year 2011 1000PS.de editors have written 2 reviews for the Husaberg TE 300 and 6 reviews for the Husqvarna TE 300 since model year 2014. The first review for the Husaberg TE 300 was published on 7/7/2010 and now has more than 17,600 views. This compares to more than 6,800 views for the first review on Husqvarna TE 300 published on 11/3/2013.
