Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013 vs. Yamaha MT-09 2016

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013

Yamaha MT-09 2016
Vue d’ensemble - Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013 vs Yamaha MT-09 2016
The Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013 and the Yamaha MT-09 2016 are both naked bikes with similar engine types, as they both feature inline three-cylinder engines. However, there are some notable differences between the two models.
In terms of engine power, the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013 comes out on top with 135 HP, while the Yamaha MT-09 2016 has 115 HP. This gives the Speed Triple a slight advantage in terms of overall power and acceleration. The Speed Triple also has a higher torque rating of 111 Nm compared to the MT-09's 87.5 Nm, which further enhances its performance capabilities.
Both bikes have a similar frame type, with an aluminum twin-tube chassis. This provides a stable and responsive riding experience for both models. However, the Yamaha MT-09 2016 offers a fully adjustable chassis, allowing riders to fine-tune the suspension to their liking. On the other hand, the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013 features upside-down telescopic forks at the front, which may not provide the same level of comfort as the Yamaha's telescopic fork.
In terms of dimensions and weights, the Yamaha MT-09 2016 has a slightly longer wheelbase of 1440 mm compared to the Speed Triple's 1435 mm. This may result in slightly better stability and handling for the MT-09. The seat height of the MT-09 is also slightly lower at 815 mm, making it more accessible for shorter riders compared to the Speed Triple's seat height of 825 mm.

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013
In terms of tire dimensions, both bikes have a front tire width of 120 mm and a front tire diameter of 17 inches. However, the Speed Triple has a wider rear tire width of 190 mm compared to the MT-09's 180 mm. This may provide slightly better traction and stability for the Speed Triple.
When it comes to weight, the Yamaha MT-09 2016 is lighter with a curb weight of 188 kg compared to the Speed Triple's 214 kg. This lighter weight may contribute to better agility and maneuverability for the MT-09.
In terms of fuel tank capacity, the Speed Triple has a larger capacity of 17.5 liters compared to the MT-09's 14 liters. This may result in longer range and fewer fuel stops for the Speed Triple.
In terms of strengths, the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013 offers a powerful three-cylinder engine, providing a sporty driving feel. Its upright seating position and stable frame contribute to a comfortable and confident riding experience.

Yamaha MT-09 2016
On the other hand, the Yamaha MT-09 2016 boasts a wonderfully powerful three-cylinder powerplant and offers three power modes, allowing riders to adjust the bike's performance to their preferences. The MT-09 also comes with a quickshifter as standard, enhancing its sporty nature. Its aggressive looks and traction control further add to its appeal.
In terms of weaknesses, the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013 has Showa suspension elements that may be slightly uncomfortable for some riders. It also has a reputation for having stubborn handling.
The Yamaha MT-09 2016 has a saddle that some riders may find too hard for long tours. Additionally, its license plate holder on the swingarm offers less splash protection compared to a conventional one.
In conclusion, both the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013 and the Yamaha MT-09 2016 have their own strengths and weaknesses. The Speed Triple offers a more powerful engine and a stable frame, while the MT-09 offers a fully adjustable chassis and additional features such as a quickshifter and traction control. Ultimately, the choice between the two models will depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.
Caractéristiques techniques Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013 par rapport à Yamaha MT-09 2016
Avantages et inconvénients en comparaison
Avantages et inconvénients en comparaison
Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013

Plus de puissance, plus de kilos, plus de caoutchouc . Certes, elle n'est pas la plus souple, ce qui rend l'ascension des montagnes tyroliennes par des centaines de virages en épingle à cheveux parfois fatigante. Mais elle est plus mûre que la Street Triple, elle sait aussi glisser avec souplesse et sans agacement le long de la vallée et, pour une raison ou une autre, elle se sent plus confiante et plus sûre.
Yamaha MT-09 2016

La Yamaha MT-09 n'a pas eu besoin d'être réinventée pour la saison à venir - elle l'a déjà été extrêmement bien il y a à peine quatre ans. Au lieu de cela, les Japonais ont misé sur un réglage fin et l'ajout de gadgets pratiques, adaptés à l'époque, comme le contrôle de traction et le changement de vitesse automatique. La norme Euro4 a une fois de plus modifié la gestion du moteur qui, en mode standard, offre un développement de la puissance certes puissant, mais bien contrôlable. Le plus grand changement, reconnaissable au premier coup d'œil, est le design, à mon avis très réussi, avec l'avant plus agressif et l'arrière redessiné. Dans l'ensemble, il s'agit donc d'une naked bike encore plus élégante, qui a clairement été construite pour le plaisir de conduire une moto.
Comparaison des prix Prix moyen du marché Triumph Speed Triple 1050 vs Yamaha MT-09
There are a few key differences between a Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013 and a Yamaha MT-09 2016. In terms of price, the actual average price of a Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013 is about 4% higher. Compared to Yamaha MT-09 2016 there are less Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 5 compared to 11. It takes less time to sell a Triumph Speed Triple 1050 with 66 days compared to 87 days for a Yamaha MT-09. Since model year 2005 1000PS.de editors have written 29 reviews for the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 and 57 reviews for the Yamaha MT-09 since model year 2013. The first review for the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 was published on 10/2/2007 and now has more than 16,200 views. This compares to more than 39,900 views for the first review on Yamaha MT-09 published on 6/10/2013.