Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011 vs. Kawasaki Z900 2017
Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011
Kawasaki Z900 2017
Vue d’ensemble - Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011 vs Kawasaki Z900 2017
In terms of engine specifications, both the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011 and the Kawasaki Z900 2017 have inline engines with liquid cooling. However, there are some differences in power and torque. The Speed Triple has a more powerful engine with 132 HP compared to the Z900's 125.4 HP. Similarly, the Speed Triple has higher torque at 110 Nm compared to the Z900's 98.6 Nm. The Speed Triple has three cylinders, while the Z900 has four.
In terms of suspension, both bikes feature upside-down telescopic forks at the front. However, there are differences in adjustment options. The Speed Triple offers compression and rebound adjustments for both the front and rear suspension, while the Z900 only offers preload and rebound adjustments for both.
When it comes to the chassis, the Speed Triple has an aluminum frame with a twin tube design, while the Z900 has a steel frame with a double cradle design. This can affect the overall weight and handling of the bikes.
Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011
Both bikes have four-piston front brakes, but there are differences in the braking technology. The Speed Triple utilizes radial technology, while the Z900 uses petal technology. This can affect the braking performance and feel.
In terms of dimensions and weights, both bikes have a front tire width of 120 mm and a front tire diameter of 17 inches. However, there are differences in the rear tire width, with the Speed Triple having a wider 190 mm tire compared to the Z900's 180 mm tire. The wheelbase of the Speed Triple is slightly shorter at 1437 mm compared to the Z900's 1450 mm. Additionally, the seat height of the Speed Triple is higher at 828 mm compared to the Z900's 795 mm.
Kawasaki Z900 2017
In terms of strengths, the Speed Triple is praised for its controlled chassis, hard sound, and stability. On the other hand, the Z900 is praised for its ingenious naked bike chassis, superb looks, and responsive engine with perfectly dimensioned torque. It is also considered to be an optimum intersection of performance, price, and practical use.
However, there are some weaknesses mentioned for both bikes. The Speed Triple is criticized for its rough gearing, which can sometimes disturb the harmony between the rider and the machine. The Z900 is noted to have a narrow knee angle, which may be uncomfortable for taller riders, but this can be addressed by ordering a different seat.
Overall, both the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011 and the Kawasaki Z900 2017 have their own strengths and weaknesses. It ultimately comes down to personal preference and priorities in terms of performance, handling, and comfort.
Caractéristiques techniques Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011 par rapport à Kawasaki Z900 2017
Avantages et inconvénients en comparaison
Avantages et inconvénients en comparaison
Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011
Plus de puissance, plus de kilos, plus de caoutchouc . Certes, elle n'est pas la plus souple, ce qui rend l'ascension des montagnes tyroliennes par des centaines de virages en épingle à cheveux parfois fatigante. Mais elle est plus mûre que la Street Triple, elle sait aussi glisser avec souplesse et sans agacement le long de la vallée et, pour une raison ou une autre, elle se sent plus confiante et plus sûre.
Kawasaki Z900 2017
La nouvelle Kawasaki Z900 n'a heureusement rien perdu de son essence avec l'utilisation de l'électronique. Elle est et reste une nakedbike de classe moyenne ludique à utiliser, qui maîtrise en même temps de manière grandiose les allures rapides sur les routes de campagne. Le plaisir de conduire et l'aptitude à l'usage quotidien sont élevés, les aides à la conduite désormais intégrées offrent un plus en matière de sécurité. Vos adversaires auront désormais la vie dure.
Comparaison des prix Prix moyen du marché Triumph Speed Triple 1050 vs Kawasaki Z900
There are a few key differences between a Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011 and a Kawasaki Z900 2017. In terms of price, the actual average price of a Kawasaki Z900 2017 is about 37% higher. A Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011 experiences a loss of 710 USD in one year and 820 USD in two years of ownership. This is offset by a loss of 520 USD and 920 USD for a Kawasaki Z900 2017. Compared to Kawasaki Z900 2017 there are less Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 6 compared to 43. It takes less time to sell a Triumph Speed Triple 1050 with 77 days compared to 85 days for a Kawasaki Z900. Since model year 2005 1000PS.de editors have written 29 reviews for the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 and 46 reviews for the Kawasaki Z900 since model year 2017. The first review for the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 was published on 10/2/2007 and now has more than 16,200 views. This compares to more than 93,200 views for the first review on Kawasaki Z900 published on 11/11/2016.
