Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011 vs. Husqvarna Vitpilen 701 2018

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011

Husqvarna Vitpilen 701 2018

Husqvarna Vitpilen 701 2018

Loading...

Vue d’ensemble - Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011 vs Husqvarna Vitpilen 701 2018

The Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011 and the Husqvarna Vitpilen 701 2018 are both naked bikes that offer unique features and characteristics.

Starting with the engine and drive train, the Speed Triple 1050 boasts a powerful 132 HP engine with a torque of 110 Nm. It has three cylinders and is liquid-cooled, providing efficient performance. On the other hand, the Vitpilen 701 has a slightly less powerful engine with 75 HP and a torque of 72 Nm. It has a single cylinder and is also liquid-cooled. Despite the lower power, the Vitpilen 701 is known for its quickshifter with blipper function, allowing for smooth gear changes and enhancing the riding experience.

In terms of suspension, both bikes feature upside-down telescopic forks. However, the Speed Triple 1050 is equipped with Showa suspension both in the front and rear, while the Vitpilen 701 has WP suspension in both areas. Both brands are reputable and known for their quality suspension systems.

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011

When it comes to the chassis, the Speed Triple 1050 has an aluminum frame with a twin tube design, providing stability and control. On the other hand, the Vitpilen 701 has a chromium-molybdenum frame with a tubular design, which contributes to its low weight and sporty handling.

In terms of braking, both bikes have four-piston front brakes with radial technology, ensuring efficient and reliable stopping power.

Moving on to dimensions and weights, both bikes have a front tire width of 120 mm and a front tire diameter of 17 inches. However, the Speed Triple 1050 has a wider rear tire with a width of 190 mm, while the Vitpilen 701 has a slightly narrower rear tire with a width of 160 mm. Both bikes have a wheelbase of around 1430 mm, providing stability and maneuverability. The seat height of the Speed Triple 1050 is 828 mm, while the Vitpilen 701 has a slightly higher seat height of 830 mm.

In terms of fuel tank capacity, the Speed Triple 1050 has a larger tank with a capacity of 17.5 liters, allowing for longer rides without the need for frequent refueling. The Vitpilen 701, on the other hand, has a smaller tank with a capacity of 12 liters, which may require more frequent refueling on longer journeys.

Husqvarna Vitpilen 701 2018

Husqvarna Vitpilen 701 2018

In terms of strengths, the Speed Triple 1050 is praised for its controlled chassis, hard sound, and overall stability. On the other hand, the Vitpilen 701 stands out for its fantastic design, powerful engine, quickshifter with blipper function, competent chassis, sporty seating position, and low weight.

However, both bikes have their weaknesses. The Speed Triple 1050 is criticized for its rough gearing, which can sometimes disrupt the harmony between the rider and the machine. On the other hand, the Vitpilen 701 is known for its uncomfortable seating position, as well as the need to be driven above 3,000 rpm to fully experience its power. Additionally, it may not be the most comfortable option for long journeys.

In conclusion, the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011 and the Husqvarna Vitpilen 701 2018 are both impressive naked bikes with their own unique features and characteristics. The Speed Triple 1050 offers a powerful engine and a controlled chassis, while the Vitpilen 701 stands out with its design, powerful engine, and sporty seating position. Both bikes have their strengths and weaknesses, so it ultimately comes down to personal preference and intended use.

Caractéristiques techniques Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011 par rapport à Husqvarna Vitpilen 701 2018

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011
Husqvarna Vitpilen 701 2018
Afficher tout
Identique uniquement
Différences
Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011
Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011
Husqvarna Vitpilen 701 2018
Husqvarna Vitpilen 701 2018

Suspension avant

Suspension avantSuspension avantFourche télescopique inverséeSuspension avantFourche télescopique inversée
MarqueMarqueShowaMarqueWP

Châssis

CadreCadreAluminiumCadreChrome-molybdène
Type de cadreType de cadreTube doubleType de cadreTubulaire

Freins arrière

TypeTypeDisqueTypeDisque
PistonPistonDouble pistonPistonPiston unique
Fixation d’amortisseurFixation d’amortisseurÉtrier flottantFixation d’amortisseurÉtrier flottant
MarqueMarqueNissinMarqueBrembo

Dimensions et poids

Largeur du pneu avantLargeur du pneu avant120 mmLargeur du pneu avant120 mm
Hauteur du pneu avantHauteur du pneu avant70 %Hauteur du pneu avant70 %
Diamètre du pneu avantDiamètre du pneu avant17 poucesDiamètre du pneu avant17 pouces
Largeur du pneu arrièreLargeur du pneu arrière190 mmLargeur du pneu arrière160 mm
Hauteur du pneu arrièreHauteur du pneu arrière55 %Hauteur du pneu arrière60 %
Diamètre du pneu arrièreDiamètre du pneu arrière17 poucesDiamètre du pneu arrière17 pouces
EmpattementEmpattement1,437 mmEmpattement1,434 mm
Hauteur de selleHauteur de selle828 mmHauteur de selle830 mm
Capacité du réservoir de carburantCapacité du réservoir de carburant17.5 lCapacité du réservoir de carburant12 l
Conformité au permisConformité au permisAConformité au permisA

Avantages et inconvénients en comparaison

Avantages et inconvénients en comparaison

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011

C'est là que même une Super Duke se retrouve à l'étroit, lorsque les virages ne sont pas trop serrés et que la KTM peut pleinement exploiter sa maniabilité radicale et sa capacité de correction dans le rayon, inégalée sur les motos naked. Car la Speed Triple est plus harmonieuse, plus patiente et plus prévisible. La Duke doit être battue, la Triple peut aussi être caressée.

Châssis contrôlé

son dur

stable.

Des engrenages grossiers perturbent parfois l'idylle entre l'homme et la machine.

Husqvarna Vitpilen 701 2018

Husqvarna Vitpilen 701 2018

La Husqvarna Vitpilen 701 est un véritable point fort de la saison 2018. Son allure est unique et la technique sous son joli design est également remarquable. La combinaison des 75 ch du fameux monocylindre et d'un Quickschifter à l'excellent passage des vitesses procure un plaisir fou sur la route. Le moteur a toutefois besoin de vitesse et la position de conduite ne plaira pas à tout le monde. La Husqvarna Vitpilen 701 est donc une moto à laquelle il faut se consacrer entièrement. Mais si l'on y parvient, le plaisir est garanti.

design fantastique

moteur puissant

quickshifter avec fonction blipper

châssis compétent

position de conduite sportive

poids faible

position assise inconfortable

doit être conduite au-dessus de 3 000 tr/min

probablement inconfortable sur de longs trajets

Comparaison des prix Prix moyen du marché Triumph Speed Triple 1050 vs Husqvarna Vitpilen 701

There are a few key differences between a Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011 and a Husqvarna Vitpilen 701 2018. In terms of price, the actual average price of a Husqvarna Vitpilen 701 2018 is about 15% higher. A Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011 experiences a loss of 710 USD in one year and 820 USD in two years of ownership. This is offset by a loss of 70 USD and 1,000 USD for a Husqvarna Vitpilen 701 2018. Compared to Husqvarna Vitpilen 701 2018 there are less Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 6 compared to 8. It takes less time to sell a Husqvarna Vitpilen 701 with 67 days compared to 77 days for the Triumph Speed Triple 1050. Since model year 2005 1000PS.de editors have written 29 reviews for the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 and 17 reviews for the Husqvarna Vitpilen 701 since model year 2018. The first review for the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 was published on 10/2/2007 and now has more than 16,200 views. This compares to more than 79,100 views for the first review on Husqvarna Vitpilen 701 published on 11/7/2017.

Prix Triumph Speed Triple 1050

Année modèle
Prix moyens actuels du marché

Prix Husqvarna Vitpilen 701

Année modèle
Prix moyens actuels du marché

Comparaisons alternatives

Partenaire 1000PS

LOUISMotorex AGcalimoto GmbHSchuberthContinental Motorradreifen