Triumph Street Triple 765 R 2020 vs. Yamaha MT-09 2016
Triumph Street Triple 765 R 2020
Yamaha MT-09 2016
Vue d’ensemble - Triumph Street Triple 765 R 2020 vs Yamaha MT-09 2016
The Triumph Street Triple 765 R 2020 and the Yamaha MT-09 2016 are both naked bikes with similar engine types, power, torque, and cylinders. However, there are several differences between the two models.
Starting with the Triumph Street Triple 765 R 2020, it offers a slightly higher engine power of 118 HP compared to the Yamaha MT-09's 115 HP. The Street Triple also has a torque of 77 Nm, while the MT-09 has a slightly higher torque of 87.5 Nm. In terms of displacement, the Street Triple has a smaller engine with 765 ccm, while the MT-09 has a larger engine with 847 ccm.
Both bikes feature an aluminium frame with a twin tube design, providing stability and agility. They also have double disk brakes at the front for efficient stopping power. The front tyre width and diameter are the same for both models, with a width of 120 mm and a diameter of 17 inches. The rear tyre width and diameter are also the same, measuring 180 mm in width and 17 inches in diameter.
Triumph Street Triple 765 R 2020
There are slight differences in the dimensions and weights of the two bikes. The Street Triple has a slightly shorter wheelbase of 1405 mm compared to the MT-09's 1440 mm. The seat height is also slightly higher on the Street Triple, measuring 825 mm, while the MT-09 has a seat height of 815 mm. In terms of fuel tank capacity, the Street Triple has a larger capacity of 17.4 liters, while the MT-09 has a smaller capacity of 14 liters.
Now let's discuss the strengths and weaknesses of each model. The Triumph Street Triple 765 R 2020 has a wide usable rev range, allowing for versatile performance on various road conditions. Its active seating position provides comfort and control, while the high stability ensures confident handling. The Street Triple also boasts a great gearbox with a shift assistant, making gear changes smooth and effortless. Additionally, its first-class chassis enhances the overall riding experience.
On the other hand, the Yamaha MT-09 2016 has a wonderfully powerful three-cylinder powerplant, delivering impressive acceleration and performance. It offers three power modes, allowing riders to adjust the bike's performance to their preferences. The fully adjustable chassis provides customization options for optimal handling. The MT-09 also comes with a quickshifter as standard, enabling seamless gear changes. Its sporty upright seating position offers a comfortable and engaging riding experience. The bike's good brakes and aggressive looks further enhance its appeal. Lastly, the MT-09 features traction control for added safety.
Yamaha MT-09 2016
In terms of weaknesses, the Triumph Street Triple 765 R 2020 has a traction control system that regulates early, potentially limiting the bike's performance in certain situations. The seat also has little grip, which may affect the rider's comfort and stability. Additionally, the display on the Street Triple is considered outdated compared to newer models.
On the other hand, the Yamaha MT-09 2016 has a saddle that some riders find too hard for long tours, potentially causing discomfort during extended rides. The licence plate holder on the swingarm also offers less splash protection compared to a conventional one, which may result in more dirt and debris accumulating on the bike.
In conclusion, both the Triumph Street Triple 765 R 2020 and the Yamaha MT-09 2016 offer impressive performance and features. The Street Triple excels in its wide usable rev range, active seating position, high stability, great gearbox with shift assistant, and first-class chassis. Meanwhile, the MT-09 stands out with its powerful three-cylinder powerplant, power modes, fully adjustable chassis, quickshifter, sporty upright seating position, good brakes, aggressive looks, and traction control. However, it's important for riders to consider their specific preferences and priorities when choosing between the two models.
Caractéristiques techniques Triumph Street Triple 765 R 2020 par rapport à Yamaha MT-09 2016
Avantages et inconvénients en comparaison
Avantages et inconvénients en comparaison
Triumph Street Triple 765 R 2020
Pour les trackdays occasionnels, la Street Triple R est parfaitement équipée et fournit une bonne performance. C'est là que le poussif trois cylindres peut faire valoir tous ses atouts. Mais l'agile Triumph est aussi très amusante sur la route, tant qu'on la maintient à un bon régime. En somme, c'est le vainqueur incontesté de la gamme Street Triple en termes de rapport qualité-prix.
Yamaha MT-09 2016
La Yamaha MT-09 n'a pas eu besoin d'être réinventée pour la saison à venir - elle l'a déjà été extrêmement bien il y a à peine quatre ans. Au lieu de cela, les Japonais ont misé sur un réglage fin et l'ajout de gadgets pratiques, adaptés à l'époque, comme le contrôle de traction et le changement de vitesse automatique. La norme Euro4 a une fois de plus modifié la gestion du moteur qui, en mode standard, offre un développement de la puissance certes puissant, mais bien contrôlable. Le plus grand changement, reconnaissable au premier coup d'œil, est le design, à mon avis très réussi, avec l'avant plus agressif et l'arrière redessiné. Dans l'ensemble, il s'agit donc d'une naked bike encore plus élégante, qui a clairement été construite pour le plaisir de conduire une moto.
Comparaison des prix Prix moyen du marché Triumph Street Triple 765 R vs Yamaha MT-09
There are a few key differences between a Triumph Street Triple 765 R 2020 and a Yamaha MT-09 2016. It takes less time to sell a Triumph Street Triple 765 R with 69 days compared to 87 days for a Yamaha MT-09. Since model year 2017 1000PS.de editors have written 15 reviews for the Triumph Street Triple 765 R and 57 reviews for the Yamaha MT-09 since model year 2013. The first review for the Triumph Street Triple 765 R was published on 1/10/2017 and now has more than 58,400 views. This compares to more than 39,900 views for the first review on Yamaha MT-09 published on 6/10/2013.
