BMW F 800 R 2009 vs. Kawasaki Z 800 2013
BMW F 800 R 2009
Kawasaki Z 800 2013
Overview - BMW F 800 R 2009 vs Kawasaki Z 800 2013
The BMW F 800 R 2009 and the Kawasaki Z 800 2013 are both naked bikes with similar technical specifications. However, there are some notable differences between the two models.
In terms of engine performance, the Kawasaki Z 800 2013 has a more powerful engine with 113 HP compared to the BMW F 800 R 2009's 87 HP. However, the BMW F 800 R 2009 has a higher torque of 86 Nm compared to the Kawasaki Z 800 2013's 83 Nm. The BMW F 800 R 2009 has a 2-cylinder engine, while the Kawasaki Z 800 2013 has a 4-cylinder engine. The displacement of the BMW F 800 R 2009 is 798 ccm, while the Kawasaki Z 800 2013 has a displacement of 806 ccm.
Both bikes have double disk brakes with four pistons at the front. They also have the same front and rear tire diameter of 17 inches. However, there is a difference in the wheelbase and seat height. The BMW F 800 R 2009 has a longer wheelbase of 1520 mm compared to the Kawasaki Z 800 2013's 1445 mm. The seat height of the BMW F 800 R 2009 is 820 mm, while the Kawasaki Z 800 2013 has a slightly higher seat height of 834 mm. The fuel tank capacity of the BMW F 800 R 2009 is 19 liters, while the Kawasaki Z 800 2013 has a slightly smaller fuel tank capacity of 17 liters.
BMW F 800 R 2009
In terms of strengths, the BMW F 800 R 2009 is known for its high-quality components, great engine performance, and the possibility of adding good equipment. It also has a well-designed cockpit and a positive chassis. Additionally, the BMW F 800 R 2009 has a low fuel consumption, which is a desirable feature.
On the other hand, the Kawasaki Z 800 2013 has an eye-catching and chunky look, which is appealing to many riders. It also offers confident acceleration and has a relaxed geometry, making it comfortable for long rides. The powerful brakes of the Kawasaki Z 800 2013 provide excellent stopping power.
Kawasaki Z 800 2013
However, both bikes have their weaknesses. The BMW F 800 R 2009 is known for its high price, which may be a deterrent for some buyers. Additionally, some riders find the first gear of the BMW F 800 R 2009 to be a little too long, affecting its overall performance. The BMW F 800 R 2009 also has some criticisms regarding its optics.
On the other hand, the Kawasaki Z 800 2013 has limited freedom of movement for the legs, which may be uncomfortable for some riders.
In conclusion, the BMW F 800 R 2009 and the Kawasaki Z 800 2013 are both capable naked bikes with their own strengths and weaknesses. The BMW F 800 R 2009 offers high-quality components, a great engine, and the possibility of adding good equipment. The Kawasaki Z 800 2013 has an eye-catching look, confident acceleration, and powerful brakes. Ultimately, the choice between the two models depends on the rider's preferences and priorities.
Technical Specifications BMW F 800 R 2009 compared to Kawasaki Z 800 2013
Pros and Cons in comparison
Pros and Cons in comparison
BMW F 800 R 2009
Dans la publicité, la nouvelle BMW F 800 R passe en partie pour une moto de femme. Ce n'est certes pas un tort pour la moto, mais le moteur civilisé, la hauteur de selle basse et les commandes souples conviennent également aux femmes de petite taille.
Kawasaki Z 800 2013
Dans l'ensemble, la Z800 a livré une performance sensationnelle. Compte tenu du fait que rien n'a été modifié ou optimisé sur le véhicule, à l'exception du pot d'échappement Remus, le résultat final est superbe.
Price Comparison Avarage Market Price BMW F 800 R vs Kawasaki Z 800
There are a few key differences between a BMW F 800 R 2009 and a Kawasaki Z 800 2013. It takes less time to sell a Kawasaki Z 800 with 56 days compared to 58 days for the BMW F 800 R. Since model year 2009 1000PS.de editors have written 20 reviews for the BMW F 800 R and 11 reviews for the Kawasaki Z 800 since model year 2013. The first review for the BMW F 800 R was published on 10/10/2008 and now has more than 8,900 views. This compares to more than 8,100 views for the first review on Kawasaki Z 800 published on 9/6/2012.
