Husqvarna FE 350 2016 vs. Husqvarna FC 250 2016
Husqvarna FE 350 2016
Husqvarna FC 250 2016
Vue d’ensemble - Husqvarna FE 350 2016 vs Husqvarna FC 250 2016
The Husqvarna FE 350 2016 and the Husqvarna FC 250 2016 are both powerful and capable motorcycles, but they have some key differences.
In terms of engine specifications, the FE 350 has a larger bore of 88 mm compared to the FC 250's 78 mm. This means that the FE 350 has a larger piston diameter, which allows for more power and torque. The FE 350 also has a longer stroke of 57.5 mm compared to the FC 250's 52.3 mm, which further enhances its power output. Additionally, the FE 350 has a compression ratio of 12.3, while the FC 250 has a higher compression ratio of 13.9. This means that the FC 250 can generate more power and efficiency from the same amount of fuel.
In terms of starting mechanism, the FE 350 has a kick starter, while the FC 250 has an electric starter. This means that starting the FC 250 is easier and more convenient, as it does not require physical effort to kickstart the engine.
Both motorcycles have a chain transmission system, which is common in off-road bikes. This type of transmission provides efficient power transfer to the rear wheel.
Both the FE 350 and the FC 250 have a single-cylinder, four-stroke engine configuration. This configuration is known for its smooth power delivery and good fuel efficiency.
Husqvarna FE 350 2016
In terms of suspension, both motorcycles feature upside-down telescopic forks at the front and WP shock mounts at the rear. This ensures excellent handling and stability on various terrains.
The chassis of both motorcycles is made of steel and has a central tube frame type. This provides a strong and rigid structure, which is essential for off-road riding.
In terms of tire dimensions, the FE 350 has a wider front tire width of 90 mm compared to the FC 250's 80 mm. The FE 350 also has a larger rear tire width of 140 mm compared to the FC 250's 100 mm. This means that the FE 350 has better traction and stability, especially in challenging off-road conditions.
The wheelbase of the FE 350 is slightly shorter at 1482 mm compared to the FC 250's 1495 mm. However, this difference is minimal and is unlikely to have a significant impact on the overall handling and performance of the motorcycles.
The seat height of the FE 350 is 970 mm, while the FC 250 has a slightly higher seat height of 992 mm. This means that the FC 250 may be more suitable for taller riders, as it provides a slightly higher riding position.
Husqvarna FC 250 2016
In terms of weight, the FE 350 has a dry weight of 109.2 kg, while the FC 250 is slightly lighter at 104.1 kg. This means that the FC 250 may be slightly more agile and easier to handle, especially in tight and technical sections.
The fuel tank capacity of the FE 350 is 9.5 liters, while the FC 250 has a smaller fuel tank capacity of 7.5 liters. This means that the FE 350 has a longer range and requires fewer fuel stops during longer rides.
In terms of strengths, the FE 350 is known for being one of the fastest motorcycles on any special stage. It offers a great balance between easy handling and good performance. On the other hand, the FC 250 is a versatile motocross bike with all-around strengths.
In terms of weaknesses, the FE 350 is more aggressive than the FE 250, which means it can be more energy-consuming. The FC 250, on the other hand, is reserved for factory teams only and can be quite expensive.
Overall, the Husqvarna FE 350 2016 and the Husqvarna FC 250 2016 are both high-performance motorcycles with their own unique strengths and weaknesses. The FE 350 offers more power and torque, while the FC 250 is a versatile motocross bike. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on the rider's preferences and intended use.
Caractéristiques techniques Husqvarna FE 350 2016 par rapport à Husqvarna FC 250 2016
Avantages et inconvénients en comparaison
Avantages et inconvénients en comparaison
Husqvarna FE 350 2016
La moto universelle de Husky, elle peut pratiquement tout faire. Et en tant qu'intermédiaire entre la 250 et la 450, elle réunit les avantages des deux modèles. En 2017, elle est également devenue un peu plus puissante et sa réactivité est désormais plus comparable à celle de la 450.
Husqvarna FC 250 2016
Comme seuls les pilotes d'usine et des journalistes triés sur le volet conduiront un jour ces motocross, cela n'a pas de sens de rédiger une conclusion. En principe, nous parlerons ici du matériel moto le plus performant et le plus rapide en tout-terrain. Chaque pièce est triée sur le volet, livrée et usinée par les meilleures entreprises. Les pilotes peuvent faire adapter leurs véhicules à 100% à leurs besoins et à leur parcours. De ce point de vue, on ne peut plus parler de faiblesses.
Comparaison des prix Prix moyen du marché Husqvarna FE 350 vs Husqvarna FC 250
There are a few key differences between a Husqvarna FE 350 2016 and a Husqvarna FC 250 2016. It takes less time to sell a Husqvarna FC 250 with 34 days compared to 44 days for the Husqvarna FE 350. Since model year 2014 1000PS.de editors have written 9 reviews for the Husqvarna FE 350 and 5 reviews for the Husqvarna FC 250 since model year 2014. The first review for the Husqvarna FE 350 was published on 7/14/2016 and now has more than 91,700 views. This compares to more than 6,800 views for the first review on Husqvarna FC 250 published on 11/3/2013.
