KTM 390 Duke 2013 vs. BMW G 310 R 2016
KTM 390 Duke 2013
BMW G 310 R 2016
Vue d’ensemble - KTM 390 Duke 2013 vs BMW G 310 R 2016
The KTM 390 Duke 2013 and the BMW G 310 R 2016 are both naked bikes, but they have some key differences in terms of their technical specifications and strengths.
In terms of engine power, the KTM 390 Duke 2013 has a more powerful engine with 44 HP compared to the BMW G 310 R 2016's 34 HP. The KTM also has a higher torque of 35 Nm compared to the BMW's 28 Nm. Both bikes have a single cylinder engine and a similar displacement, with the KTM at 375 ccm and the BMW at 313 ccm.
Both bikes have upside-down telescopic fork front suspensions and tubular frames. However, the KTM has a chromium-molybdenum frame while the BMW has a steel frame. This could potentially affect the weight and handling of the bikes, with the BMW potentially being lighter and having better handling due to its ingenious chassis.
KTM 390 Duke 2013
In terms of brakes, both bikes have single disk front brakes and advanced rider assistance systems with ABS. However, the KTM does not have the option for chassis adjustment, which could be a drawback for riders who prefer to customize their bike's suspension.
In terms of dimensions and weights, both bikes have the same front and rear tire widths and diameters. The KTM has a slightly shorter wheelbase at 1367 mm compared to the BMW's 1374 mm. The seat height of the KTM is also slightly higher at 800 mm compared to the BMW's 785 mm. Both bikes have the same fuel tank capacity of 11 liters.
In terms of strengths, the KTM 390 Duke 2013 has the advantage of being lightweight, which could make it more agile and easier to handle. It also has sufficient power and a low consumption rate, which could be appealing to riders who want a balance between performance and fuel efficiency.
BMW G 310 R 2016
On the other hand, the BMW G 310 R 2016 is praised for its handling, weight, ingenious chassis, and stability. These characteristics could make it a more enjoyable and stable ride, especially for riders who prioritize these aspects.
In terms of weaknesses, the KTM 390 Duke 2013 does not have the option for chassis adjustment, which could limit customization and comfort for some riders. The BMW G 310 R 2016 has a weakness in its brake pedal, although the specific details of this weakness are not provided.
Overall, both the KTM 390 Duke 2013 and the BMW G 310 R 2016 have their own strengths and weaknesses. The KTM offers more power and a lightweight design, while the BMW offers better handling and stability. Riders should consider their own preferences and priorities when choosing between these two models.
Caractéristiques techniques KTM 390 Duke 2013 par rapport à BMW G 310 R 2016
Avantages et inconvénients en comparaison
Avantages et inconvénients en comparaison
KTM 390 Duke 2013
La KTM 390 Duke célèbre la légèreté de l'être.
BMW G 310 R 2016
Sur les premiers mètres, je me suis brièvement dit qu'il manquait un peu de puissance. Cependant, après un certain temps, il s'est vite avéré que la puissance ne fait pas tout et que le plaisir de conduire peut être garanti même avec peu de chevaux. Aux États-Unis, le code de la route prévoit ce que l'on appelle le "lane splitting", ce qui signifie que l'on doit avancer entre les voitures quand il y a des bouchons. Avant les feux de signalisation par exemple. Je dois avouer qu'au début, je ne me sentais pas très à l'aise ici. Une Porsche à gauche, une Dodge à droite, on n'a vraiment pas envie de les frôler avec son vélo. Toutefois, le guidon de la BMW G310R est plutôt étroit et on peut vraiment se faufiler sans crainte à travers les files de voitures vers l'avant ! Le seul défaut que j'ai remarqué dès le début est la pédale de frein. Elle est malheureusement un peu basse. Le frein arrière s'est également enclenché un peu tard. Mais cela peut certainement être optimisé par un réglage. En résumé, c'est un vélo très réussi. Il est super polyvalent, vraiment amusant dans tous les domaines et on se sent bien dès le premier instant ! Selon la plage de régime dans laquelle on se trouve, on peut adapter le vélo à son style de conduite. Cruiser à bas régime et conduire de manière super sportive à haut régime ! Le roadster polyvalent parfait à un prix exceptionnel.
Comparaison des prix Prix moyen du marché KTM 390 Duke vs BMW G 310 R
There are a few key differences between a KTM 390 Duke 2013 and a BMW G 310 R 2016. There are the same number of bikes of both models available on the 1000PS.de marketplace, specifically 4. Since model year 2013 1000PS.de editors have written 33 reviews for the KTM 390 Duke and 16 reviews for the BMW G 310 R since model year 2016. The first review for the KTM 390 Duke was published on 11/12/2012 and now has more than 26,300 views. This compares to more than 28,500 views for the first review on BMW G 310 R published on 10/7/2015.
