Yamaha MT-07 2022 vs. Suzuki SV 650 2023
Yamaha MT-07 2022
Suzuki SV 650 2023
Vue d’ensemble - Yamaha MT-07 2022 vs Suzuki SV 650 2023
The Yamaha MT-07 2022 and the Suzuki SV 650 2023 are both naked bikes that offer a thrilling riding experience. However, they have some key differences in terms of their technical specifications and strengths.
Starting with the technical specifications, the Yamaha MT-07 2022 is equipped with an in-line engine that delivers a power output of 73.4 HP and a torque of 67 Nm. On the other hand, the Suzuki SV 650 2023 features a V-type engine with a power output of 73 HP and a torque of 64 Nm. Both bikes have a fuel injection system, liquid cooling, and a 2-cylinder configuration.
In terms of suspension, both bikes feature a telescopic fork at the front and a swing arm with a monoshock at the rear. This setup provides a comfortable and stable ride for both models. The chassis of both bikes is made of steel, ensuring durability and stability.
Yamaha MT-07 2022
When it comes to braking, the Yamaha MT-07 2022 is equipped with double disk brakes at the front with a diameter of 298 mm, while the Suzuki SV 650 2023 has slightly smaller double disk brakes with a diameter of 290 mm. Both bikes come with ABS as an advanced rider assistance system, enhancing safety during braking.
In terms of dimensions and weights, the Yamaha MT-07 2022 has a front tire width of 120 mm and a rear tire width of 180 mm, with both tires having a diameter of 17 inches. It has a wheelbase of 1400 mm and a seat height of 805 mm. The kerb weight of the MT-07 is 184 kg, and it has a fuel tank capacity of 14 liters, providing a range of 333 km. The combined fuel consumption is 4.2 l/100km.
On the other hand, the Suzuki SV 650 2023 has a front tire width of 120 mm and a rear tire width of 160 mm, also with a diameter of 17 inches. It has a slightly longer wheelbase of 1445 mm and a lower seat height of 785 mm. The kerb weight of the SV 650 is 200 kg, and it has a fuel tank capacity of 14.5 liters, providing a range of 353 km. The combined fuel consumption is 4.1 l/100km.
Moving on to the strengths of each bike, the Yamaha MT-07 2022 is known for its lively and powerful engine, producing a satisfying sound. It offers a comfortable seating position, allowing riders to enjoy long rides without discomfort. The braking system of the MT-07 is also highly regarded for its effectiveness. Additionally, the instruments on the bike are easy to read, providing clear information to the rider.
Suzuki SV 650 2023
On the other hand, the Suzuki SV 650 2023 boasts the last V2 powerplant in its class, giving it a unique and distinctive character. It offers a beginner-friendly seating position, making it suitable for riders who are new to the naked bike segment. The SV 650 is known for its easy handling, allowing riders to maneuver through traffic and corners with confidence. It also has a timeless look that appeals to riders who appreciate classic design.
However, both bikes have their weaknesses. The Yamaha MT-07 2022 does not have an adjustable chassis, limiting customization options for riders. It also lacks a TFT display, which may be a drawback for riders who prefer more advanced instrument panels. On the other hand, the Suzuki SV 650 2023 requires manual force for the brakes, which may be less convenient for some riders. It also lacks additional electronics apart from ABS, and the instruments are only moderately readable.
In conclusion, the Yamaha MT-07 2022 and the Suzuki SV 650 2023 are both impressive naked bikes with their own strengths and weaknesses. The MT-07 offers a lively engine, comfortable seating position, and a reliable braking system, while the SV 650 features a unique V2 powerplant, beginner-friendly ergonomics, and easy handling. Riders should consider their preferences and priorities to choose the bike that best suits their needs.
Caractéristiques techniques Yamaha MT-07 2022 par rapport à Suzuki SV 650 2023
Avantages et inconvénients en comparaison
Avantages et inconvénients en comparaison
Yamaha MT-07 2022
Peu de motos de la catégorie dite d'entrée de gamme procurent autant de plaisir que la Yamaha MT-07. Même la version bridée à 48 ch peut, grâce à sa cylindrée relativement importante, tenir plus longtemps que l'on ne pourrait le supposer face à la version complète. Les autres composants s'en sortent également bien, tant les freins que le châssis ne veulent effrayer personne avec trop de dureté, mais n'atteignent pas immédiatement leurs limites, même pour les pilotes les plus sportifs. L'optique est désormais plus cohérente, le phare à LED minimaliste s'accorde parfaitement avec le look anguleux.
Suzuki SV 650 2023
La Suzuki SV 650 est sur le marché depuis 25 ans, plus longtemps qu'aucune autre moto. Le moteur a reçu une mise à jour Euro5 et se présente désormais de manière encore plus adulte, ce qui le met clairement en harmonie avec le reste du package. La SV 650 ne veut effrayer personne, surtout pas les débutants. Le châssis donne une impression de solidité et de sérénité, le frein demande une bonne force manuelle pour éviter un surfreinage inattendu. L'optique est d'une part intemporelle, mais d'autre part vraiment un peu dépassée sur certains composants. En revanche, le prix est correct, comme d'habitude chez Suzuki.
Comparaison des prix Prix moyen du marché Yamaha MT-07 vs Suzuki SV 650
There are a few key differences between a Yamaha MT-07 2022 and a Suzuki SV 650 2023. In terms of price, the actual average price of a Yamaha MT-07 2022 is about 19% higher. Compared to Suzuki SV 650 2023 there are less Yamaha MT-07 2022 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 52 compared to 125. It takes less time to sell a Yamaha MT-07 with 109 days compared to 133 days for a Suzuki SV 650. Since model year 2013 1000PS.de editors have written 69 reviews for the Yamaha MT-07 and 25 reviews for the Suzuki SV 650 since model year 2005. The first review for the Yamaha MT-07 was published on 11/4/2013 and now has more than 12,600 views. This compares to more than 14,200 views for the first review on Suzuki SV 650 published on 9/26/2008.
