Husqvarna TE 300 2015 vs. Husqvarna FC 350 2017
Husqvarna TE 300 2015
Husqvarna FC 350 2017
Vue d’ensemble - Husqvarna TE 300 2015 vs Husqvarna FC 350 2017
The Husqvarna TE 300 2015 and the Husqvarna FC 350 2017 are both high-performance motorcycles designed for different purposes. The TE 300 is an enduro motorcycle, while the FC 350 is a motocross bike.
In terms of engine specifications, the TE 300 has a 293.2cc 2-stroke engine with a bore and stroke of 72mm. It features an electric and kick starter, while the FC 350 has a 349.7cc 4-stroke engine with a bore and stroke of 88mm and 57.5mm respectively. It only has an electric starter. Both bikes have a single cylinder configuration and use a chain transmission.
The suspension system on both bikes is similar, with upside-down telescopic forks at the front and a deflection shock mount at the rear. The suspension components are provided by WP for both models.
Husqvarna TE 300 2015
In terms of chassis, both bikes have a steel frame with a central tube design. This provides stability and durability for off-road riding.
In terms of dimensions and weights, the FC 350 has a slightly longer wheelbase at 1495mm compared to the TE 300's 1482mm. The seat height of the FC 350 is also higher at 992mm compared to the TE 300's 960mm. The dry weight of the FC 350 is slightly heavier at 106.4kg compared to the TE 300's 104.6kg. The fuel tank capacity of the TE 300 is larger at 11 liters compared to the FC 350's 7.5 liters.
Husqvarna FC 350 2017
The TE 300 has several strengths, including being lightweight, powerful, and extremely fast. Its engine is easy to control and provides lots of traction in the lower rev range, while still offering power for every situation in the upper rev range. Additionally, the TE 300 is inexpensive to run with minimal service costs and is known for its reliability.
On the other hand, the FC 350 is praised for its good traction and brakes with good dosing. However, it has a few weaknesses, including a fork that dips too far and a narrow brake pressure point.
In summary, the Husqvarna TE 300 2015 is a lightweight and powerful enduro motorcycle, known for its traction and reliability. The Husqvarna FC 350 2017, on the other hand, is a motocross bike with good traction and brakes, but has some issues with the fork and brake pressure.
Caractéristiques techniques Husqvarna TE 300 2015 par rapport à Husqvarna FC 350 2017
Avantages et inconvénients en comparaison
Avantages et inconvénients en comparaison
Husqvarna TE 300 2015
La machine de course pour les amateurs de deux temps. Parfaitement configurée et rapide comme une flèche. Un best-seller dans la gamme Husvqarna ! À juste titre ! Lors du test, nous l'avons également essayée en combinaison avec un embrayage Rekluse. Mais l'ensemble semblait alors un peu trop nerveux. Il est préférable de profiter de la TE300 normalement, avec un embrayage traditionnel.
Husqvarna FC 350 2017
La Husqvarna FC 350 offre un ensemble réussi qui se distingue de la KTM 350 EXC-F de construction identique dans les détails. Le moteur puissant est convaincant avec une traction propre, même si le moteur doit être maintenu à un régime élevé. En ce qui concerne la maniabilité, la fourche de la Husqvarna FC 350 plonge trop, ce qui rend la performance de conduite un peu carrée. En revanche, les freins sont faciles à doser, même si le point de pression est très serré.
Comparaison des prix Prix moyen du marché Husqvarna TE 300 vs Husqvarna FC 350
There are a few key differences between a Husqvarna TE 300 2015 and a Husqvarna FC 350 2017. It takes less time to sell a Husqvarna TE 300 with 37 days compared to 94 days for a Husqvarna FC 350. Since model year 2014 1000PS.de editors have written 6 reviews for the Husqvarna TE 300 and 3 reviews for the Husqvarna FC 350 since model year 2014. The first review for the Husqvarna TE 300 was published on 11/3/2013 and now has more than 6,800 views. This compares to more than 66,200 views for the first review on Husqvarna FC 350 published on 11/6/2017.
