Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2017 vs. Kawasaki ER-6n 2011
Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2017
Kawasaki ER-6n 2011
Vue d’ensemble - Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2017 vs Kawasaki ER-6n 2011
The Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2017 and the Kawasaki ER-6n 2011 are both naked bikes that offer a thrilling riding experience. However, there are several key differences between the two models.
In terms of engine performance, the Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2017 comes out on top. It boasts an inline three-cylinder engine with a power output of 123 HP and a torque of 77 Nm. This provides the bike with a wonderfully sporty feel and plenty of power on tap. On the other hand, the Kawasaki ER-6n 2011 features an inline twin-cylinder engine with a power output of 72 HP and a torque of 66 Nm. While it may not be as powerful as the Street Triple, it still offers a decent amount of performance.
Both bikes have liquid cooling systems to ensure optimal engine temperature. The Street Triple has a displacement of 765cc, while the ER-6n has a displacement of 649cc. This means that the Street Triple has a slightly larger engine, which contributes to its higher power output.
Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2017
In terms of suspension, both bikes feature a monoshock rear shock absorber. This helps to provide a comfortable and controlled ride. However, the Street Triple has an advantage with its aluminum frame, which offers better rigidity and handling compared to the ER-6n's steel frame.
When it comes to braking, the Street Triple once again takes the lead. It is equipped with double disc brakes at the front, featuring four pistons and radial, monoblock technology. This provides excellent stopping power and precise control. The ER-6n, on the other hand, has double piston front disc brakes with petal technology. While still effective, they may not offer the same level of performance as the Street Triple's brakes.
In terms of dimensions and weights, both bikes have similar front and rear tire widths. They also share the same wheelbase of 1410mm. However, there are slight differences in seat height and fuel tank capacity. The Street Triple has a seat height of 825mm and a fuel tank capacity of 17.4 liters, while the ER-6n has a seat height of 790mm and a fuel tank capacity of 15.5 liters.
Kawasaki ER-6n 2011
Moving on to strengths and weaknesses, the Street Triple has several notable strengths. Its engine is praised for its sporty performance and the quickshifter is a valuable addition. The bike also has a throaty sound, excellent braking system, and ABS and traction control as standard, which can be switched off for more experienced riders. Additionally, the Street Triple has a cool and stylish appearance, as well as a low weight, which contributes to its agility on the road. However, it does have a weakness in the form of complicated menu navigation.
On the other hand, the ER-6n has fewer strengths but no apparent weaknesses. It offers ABS, wider handlebars, a slimmer waist, increased intake noise, and a comfortable seat. The bike also has an uncomplicated chassis, which can be appealing to riders who prefer a simpler design.
In conclusion, the Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2017 and the Kawasaki ER-6n 2011 are both capable naked bikes. The Street Triple offers more power, better braking, and a more advanced frame, while the ER-6n has its own strengths in terms of comfort and simplicity. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.
Caractéristiques techniques Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2017 par rapport à Kawasaki ER-6n 2011
Avantages et inconvénients en comparaison
Avantages et inconvénients en comparaison
Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2017
Le modèle haut de gamme des Street Triples mérite pleinement son appellation. Plus sportive à tous points de vue que la version R, la RS se présente sur la route comme une machine de plaisir qui n'a que peu d'adversaires à craindre. Les trackdays sur la piste de course sont également un sujet de discussion, d'autant plus que le moteur est très pointu, que le frein Brembo est super sportif et que le châssis avec l'amortisseur Öhlins est merveilleusement précis. La maniabilité est de toute façon une merveille, la Street Triple est toujours la plus légère de sa catégorie. Le Quickshifter de série consolide encore plus la position du modèle haut de gamme.
Kawasaki ER-6n 2011
Un ensemble aussi cohérent avec des détails aussi fins n'existe nulle part ailleurs à ce prix. L'ER-6n a retrouvé un peu de piquant sur le plan visuel et dynamique et est plus amusante que jamais.
Comparaison des prix Prix moyen du marché Triumph Street Triple 765 RS vs Kawasaki ER-6n
There are a few key differences between a Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2017 and a Kawasaki ER-6n 2011. In terms of price, the actual average price of a Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2017 is about 121% higher. A Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2017 experiences a loss of 20 USD in one year of ownership. This is offset by a loss of 230 USD for a Kawasaki ER-6n 2011. Compared to Kawasaki ER-6n 2011 there are less Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2017 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 4 compared to 5. It takes less time to sell a Kawasaki ER-6n with 49 days compared to 67 days for the Triumph Street Triple 765 RS. Since model year 2017 1000PS.de editors have written 26 reviews for the Triumph Street Triple 765 RS and 16 reviews for the Kawasaki ER-6n since model year 2006. The first review for the Triumph Street Triple 765 RS was published on 1/10/2017 and now has more than 58,400 views. This compares to more than 11,200 views for the first review on Kawasaki ER-6n published on 6/29/2005.
