Kawasaki Z 800 2013 vs. Kawasaki Ninja ZX-6R 636 2013

Kawasaki Z 800 2013

Kawasaki Z 800 2013

Kawasaki Ninja ZX-6R 636 2013

Kawasaki Ninja ZX-6R 636 2013

Loading...

Vue d’ensemble - Kawasaki Z 800 2013 vs Kawasaki Ninja ZX-6R 636 2013

The Kawasaki Z 800 2013 and the Kawasaki Ninja ZX-6R 636 2013 are both impressive motorcycles, but they have distinct differences in terms of their specifications and strengths.

Starting with the Kawasaki Z 800 2013, this naked bike has an eye-catching, chunky look that appeals to riders who want a bold and aggressive appearance. It is powered by an inline, liquid-cooled engine with a displacement of 806cc. This engine delivers a maximum power of 113 HP and a torque of 83 Nm, providing confident acceleration and a thrilling riding experience. The Z 800 has a compression ratio of 11.9 and features a four-cylinder configuration. The cooling system is liquid-based, ensuring optimal engine performance.

In terms of suspension, the Z 800 is equipped with an upside-down telescopic fork at the front, providing stability and control during rides. The front suspension can be adjusted for rebound, allowing riders to fine-tune their riding experience. The rear suspension also offers rebound adjustment. The frame of the Z 800 is made of steel and has a double cradle design, contributing to its sturdy and durable construction.

The braking system of the Z 800 consists of double disk brakes at the front, with four pistons for enhanced stopping power. The brakes utilize petal technology, which improves heat dissipation and reduces brake fade. The front tire has a width of 120 mm and a diameter of 17 inches, while the rear tire has a width of 180 mm and the same diameter. The wheelbase of the Z 800 measures 1445 mm, providing stability during rides. The seat height is 834 mm, and the kerb weight is 229 kg. The fuel tank has a capacity of 17 liters.

Kawasaki Z 800 2013

Kawasaki Z 800 2013

Moving on to the Kawasaki Ninja ZX-6R 636 2013, this supersport bike offers a more aggressive and sporty design compared to the Z 800. It is powered by an inline, liquid-cooled engine with a displacement of 636cc. This engine delivers a higher maximum power of 131 HP, providing exhilarating acceleration and impressive performance on the road. The torque is slightly lower at 71 Nm, but still offers a thrilling riding experience. The compression ratio is higher at 12.9, contributing to the bike's performance-oriented nature. The Ninja ZX-6R 636 also features a four-cylinder configuration and a liquid cooling system.

In terms of suspension, the Ninja ZX-6R 636 is equipped with an upside-down telescopic fork at the front, similar to the Z 800. However, the front suspension of the Ninja ZX-6R 636 offers more adjustment options, including compression, preload, and rebound. The rear suspension also offers the same adjustment options. The frame of the Ninja ZX-6R 636 is made of aluminum and has a twin-tube, perimeter, extruded design, providing a lightweight and rigid structure for enhanced handling and maneuverability.

The braking system of the Ninja ZX-6R 636 consists of double disk brakes at the front, with four pistons for powerful and precise braking performance. The brakes utilize radial, monoblock, petal technology, further enhancing their performance capabilities. The tire dimensions and wheelbase of the Ninja ZX-6R 636 are the same as the Z 800. The seat height is slightly lower at 830 mm, and the kerb weight is lighter at 192 kg. The fuel tank capacity remains the same at 17 liters.

Kawasaki Ninja ZX-6R 636 2013

Kawasaki Ninja ZX-6R 636 2013

In terms of strengths, the Kawasaki Z 800 2013 stands out with its eye-catching design, confident acceleration, relaxed geometry, and powerful brakes. The chunky look of the Z 800 appeals to riders who want a visually striking motorcycle, while the acceleration and torque provide an exciting riding experience. The relaxed geometry of the bike ensures comfortable and stable rides, and the powerful brakes offer excellent stopping power.

On the other hand, the Kawasaki Ninja ZX-6R 636 2013 has strengths in its sharpened geometry, seating position, handling, and uncompromising reliability. The sporty design and sharpened geometry of the Ninja ZX-6R 636 make it a formidable machine on the road, while the seating position offers a good balance between comfort and control. The handling capabilities of the Ninja ZX-6R 636 are commendable, allowing riders to confidently navigate corners and curves. Additionally, Kawasaki motorcycles are known for their reliability, ensuring that the Ninja ZX-6R 636 will perform consistently.

In terms of weaknesses, the Kawasaki Z 800 2013 has limited freedom of movement for the legs, which may be a concern for riders who prefer a more spacious riding position. On the other hand, the Kawasaki Ninja ZX-6R 636 2013 has a high purchase price, which may deter some potential buyers.

Overall, both the Kawasaki Z 800 2013 and the Kawasaki Ninja ZX-6R 636 2013 are impressive motorcycles with their own unique strengths and weaknesses. The Z 800 offers a bold and aggressive design with confident acceleration, while the Ninja ZX-6R 636 provides a sportier and more performance-oriented riding experience. Ultimately, the choice between these two models will depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.

Caractéristiques techniques Kawasaki Z 800 2013 par rapport à Kawasaki Ninja ZX-6R 636 2013

Kawasaki Z 800 2013
Kawasaki Ninja ZX-6R 636 2013

Moteur et chaîne cinématique

Type de moteurType de moteurEn ligneType de moteurEn ligne
AlésageAlésage71 mmAlésage67 mm
CourseCourse50.9 mmCourse45.1 mm
Puissance du moteurPuissance du moteur113 chPuissance du moteur131 ch
Tr/min à la puissance max.Tr/min à la puissance max.10,200 tr/minTr/min à la puissance max.13,500 tr/min
CoupleCouple83 NmCouple71 Nm
Tr/min au coupleTr/min au couple8,000 tr/minTr/min au couple11,500 tr/min
Taux de compressionTaux de compression11.9 Taux de compression12.9
Type d’embrayageType d’embrayageMultidisque à bain d’huileType d’embrayageMultidisque à bain d’huile
AllumageAllumageDigitalAllumageDigital
TransmissionTransmissionChaîneTransmissionChaîne
Nombre de vitessesNombre de vitesses6Nombre de vitesses6
CylindresCylindres4Cylindres4
TempsTemps4 tempsTemps4 temps
RefroidissementRefroidissementliquideRefroidissementliquide
CylindréeCylindrée806 cm³Cylindrée636 cm³

Suspension avant

Suspension avantSuspension avantFourche télescopique inverséeSuspension avantFourche télescopique inversée
AjustementAjustementDétenteAjustementCompression, Précharge, Détente

Suspension arrière

AjustementAjustementDétenteAjustementCompression, Précharge, Détente

Châssis

CadreCadreAcierCadreAluminium
Type de cadreType de cadreDouble berceauType de cadreTube double, Périmètre, profilé extrudé

Freins avant

TypeTypeDouble disqueTypeDouble disque
PistonPistonQuatre pistonsPistonQuatre pistons
Fixation d’amortisseurFixation d’amortisseurÉtrier fixeFixation d’amortisseurÉtrier semi flottant
TechnologieTechnologiePétaleTechnologieradial, Monobloc, Pétale

Freins arrière

TypeTypeDisqueTypeDisque
PistonPistonPiston uniquePistonPiston unique
Fixation d’amortisseurFixation d’amortisseurÉtrier flottantFixation d’amortisseurÉtrier flottant

Dimensions et poids

Largeur du pneu avantLargeur du pneu avant120 mmLargeur du pneu avant120 mm
Hauteur du pneu avantHauteur du pneu avant70 %Hauteur du pneu avant70 %
Diamètre du pneu avantDiamètre du pneu avant17 poucesDiamètre du pneu avant17 pouces
Largeur du pneu arrièreLargeur du pneu arrière180 mmLargeur du pneu arrière180 mm
Hauteur du pneu arrièreHauteur du pneu arrière55 %Hauteur du pneu arrière55 %
Diamètre du pneu arrièreDiamètre du pneu arrière17 poucesDiamètre du pneu arrière17 pouces
LongueurLongueur2,100 mmLongueur2,085 mm
LargeurLargeur800 mmLargeur705 mm
HauteurHauteur1,050 mmHauteur1,115 mm
EmpattementEmpattement1,445 mmEmpattement1,395 mm
Hauteur de selleHauteur de selle834 mmHauteur de selle830 mm
Poids en ordre de marchePoids en ordre de marche229 kgPoids en ordre de marche192 kg
Capacité du réservoir de carburantCapacité du réservoir de carburant17 lCapacité du réservoir de carburant17 l
Conformité au permisConformité au permisAConformité au permisA

Avantages et inconvénients en comparaison

Avantages et inconvénients en comparaison

Kawasaki Z 800 2013

Kawasaki Z 800 2013

Dans l'ensemble, la Z800 a livré une performance sensationnelle. Compte tenu du fait que rien n'a été modifié ou optimisé sur le véhicule, à l'exception du pot d'échappement Remus, le résultat final est superbe.

Aspect frappant et grossier

démarrage souverain

géométrie détendue

freins puissants

Liberté de mouvement limitée au niveau des jambes.

Kawasaki Ninja ZX-6R 636 2013

Kawasaki Ninja ZX-6R 636 2013

La Kawa convainc par sa bonne maniabilité et sa fiabilité sans compromis. Une moto puissante, mais certainement pas une bonne affaire.

Géométrie affûtée

position assise correcte

bonne maniabilité

fiabilité sans compromis.

Prix d'achat élevé.

Comparaison des prix Prix moyen du marché Kawasaki Z 800 vs Kawasaki Ninja ZX-6R 636

There are a few key differences between a Kawasaki Z 800 2013 and a Kawasaki Ninja ZX-6R 636 2013. There are the same number of bikes of both models available on the 1000PS.de marketplace, specifically 7. It takes less time to sell a Kawasaki Z 800 with 56 days compared to 122 days for a Kawasaki Ninja ZX-6R 636. Since model year 2013 1000PS.de editors have written 11 reviews for the Kawasaki Z 800 and 7 reviews for the Kawasaki Ninja ZX-6R 636 since model year 2013. The first review for the Kawasaki Z 800 was published on 9/6/2012 and now has more than 8,100 views. This compares to more than 20,800 views for the first review on Kawasaki Ninja ZX-6R 636 published on 12/3/2012.

Prix Kawasaki Z 800

Année modèle
Prix moyens actuels du marché

Prix Kawasaki Ninja ZX-6R 636

Année modèle
Prix moyens actuels du marché

Comparaisons alternatives

Partenaire 1000PS

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH