Kawasaki ER-6n 2013 vs. Honda NC750S 2015
Kawasaki ER-6n 2013
Honda NC750S 2015
Vue d’ensemble - Kawasaki ER-6n 2013 vs Honda NC750S 2015
The Kawasaki ER-6n 2013 and the Honda NC750S 2015 are both naked bikes with similar engine types, cooling systems, and suspension rear shock absorbers. However, there are several notable differences between the two models.
In terms of engine power, the Kawasaki ER-6n 2013 has a higher output with 72 HP compared to the Honda NC750S 2015's 55 HP. The Kawasaki also has a slightly lower torque of 64 Nm, while the Honda boasts 68 Nm of torque. Both bikes have 2 cylinders and liquid cooling systems.
When it comes to chassis, the Kawasaki ER-6n 2013 features a steel frame with a perimeter design, while the Honda NC750S 2015 has a steel frame with a twin tube, tubular design. This difference in frame design may affect the overall handling and stability of the bikes.
Kawasaki ER-6n 2013
In terms of brakes, both bikes have double piston front brakes. However, the Kawasaki ER-6n 2013 is noted to have weak brakes, which may be a disadvantage for riders who prioritize braking performance.
In terms of dimensions and weights, the Honda NC750S 2015 has a longer wheelbase of 1525 mm compared to the Kawasaki ER-6n 2013's 1410 mm. The seat height of the Honda is also slightly lower at 790 mm, while the Kawasaki's seat height is 805 mm. The Honda is slightly heavier with a kerb weight of 216 kg compared to the Kawasaki's 208 kg. Additionally, the Honda has a smaller fuel tank capacity of 14.1 liters, while the Kawasaki can hold up to 16 liters of fuel.
Honda NC750S 2015
In terms of strengths, the Kawasaki ER-6n 2013 is praised for its solid handling and high quality level. On the other hand, the Honda NC750S 2015 is considered a perfect everyday vehicle with high quality and valuable details. It also features a color display and a storage compartment, which can be advantageous for riders who value convenience.
In terms of weaknesses, the Kawasaki ER-6n 2013 is criticized for its weak brakes. The Honda NC750S 2015, on the other hand, is described as having an unagitated design and being moderately sporty, which may be a drawback for riders seeking a more aggressive and visually striking bike.
Overall, both the Kawasaki ER-6n 2013 and the Honda NC750S 2015 have their own strengths and weaknesses. The Kawasaki offers solid handling and a high quality level, while the Honda provides a practical and convenient everyday riding experience. Ultimately, the choice between the two models will depend on the rider's specific preferences and priorities.
Caractéristiques techniques Kawasaki ER-6n 2013 par rapport à Honda NC750S 2015
Avantages et inconvénients en comparaison
Avantages et inconvénients en comparaison
Kawasaki ER-6n 2013
Le moteur est très puissant et amusant, et l'ER brille par sa finition japonaise soignée et son prix compétitif.
Honda NC750S 2015
Nous évitons volontiers de parler des motos comme de véhicules utilitaires, mais la NC 750 S est si utile que ce mot en devient sympathique. Le compartiment de rangement sous le faux réservoir est toujours unique et constitue une caractéristique géniale de cette moto naked qui ne brille pas par sa sportivité et son action, mais par sa fonctionnalité et son utilisabilité quasi parfaites. Grâce aux modes de conduite supplémentaires, le DCT fonctionne encore mieux. Une moto, non pas pour les cascadeurs, mais pour ceux qui roulent en ville et à la campagne.
Comparaison des prix Prix moyen du marché Kawasaki ER-6n vs Honda NC750S
There are a few key differences between a Kawasaki ER-6n 2013 and a Honda NC750S 2015. It takes less time to sell a Kawasaki ER-6n with 42 days compared to 94 days for a Honda NC750S. Since model year 2006 1000PS.de editors have written 16 reviews for the Kawasaki ER-6n and 6 reviews for the Honda NC750S since model year 2014. The first review for the Kawasaki ER-6n was published on 6/29/2005 and now has more than 11,200 views. This compares to more than 11,100 views for the first review on Honda NC750S published on 11/3/2013.
