Suzuki GSR 750 2017 vs. Yamaha MT-09 2017
Suzuki GSR 750 2017
Yamaha MT-09 2017
Vue d’ensemble - Suzuki GSR 750 2017 vs Yamaha MT-09 2017
The Suzuki GSR 750 2017 and the Yamaha MT-09 2017 are both naked bikes with similar engine types, but there are several differences between the two models.
In terms of engine power, the Yamaha MT-09 has an advantage with 115 HP compared to the Suzuki GSR 750's 106 HP. The Yamaha also has a higher torque of 87.5 Nm compared to the Suzuki's 80 Nm. This means that the Yamaha may have better acceleration and overall performance.
Both bikes have a similar number of cylinders, with the Suzuki having 4 and the Yamaha having 3. However, the Yamaha has a larger displacement of 847ccm compared to the Suzuki's 749ccm. This may result in a smoother and more powerful performance from the Yamaha.
Suzuki GSR 750 2017
In terms of chassis, the Suzuki has a steel frame while the Yamaha has an aluminum frame. The aluminum frame may provide better stability and handling, giving the Yamaha an advantage in this area.
Both bikes have double disk brakes at the front, providing good stopping power. The dimensions and weights of the two bikes are also similar, with the same front and rear tire widths and diameters. The Suzuki has a slightly longer wheelbase of 1450mm compared to the Yamaha's 1440mm. Both bikes have a seat height of 815mm and a fuel tank capacity of 17.5l for the Suzuki and 14l for the Yamaha.
Now, let's discuss the strengths and weaknesses of each bike. The Suzuki GSR 750 2017 has an attractive overall appearance and stable handling. The suspension elements have been successfully tuned, providing a comfortable ride. The instruments are also easy to read, adding to the overall user-friendly experience.
On the other hand, the Yamaha MT-09 2017 has several strengths. The Öhlins suspension is an extreme enrichment, providing excellent performance. The addition of Akrapovic improves both the optics and sound of the bike. The Magura HC3 radial brake pump works divinely, enhancing the braking system. The Carbon2Race covers offer grandiose optics, adding to the overall aesthetic appeal. Additionally, the combination of the seat, footrests, and handlebar clamps is very effective, providing a comfortable and ergonomic riding position.
Yamaha MT-09 2017
However, both bikes have their weaknesses. The Suzuki GSR 750 2017 has a brake system that requires a lot of manual force, which may be a disadvantage in emergency situations. Additionally, the box swingarm of the Suzuki is not particularly pretty, which may be a drawback for some riders.
On the other hand, the Yamaha MT-09 2017 has some weaknesses related to financial outlay and working time. Certain parts of the bike must be registered, which may require additional time and effort. The ECU Flash is not road legal, which may be a limitation for riders who want to comply with legal requirements.
In conclusion, the Suzuki GSR 750 2017 and the Yamaha MT-09 2017 have their own strengths and weaknesses. The Yamaha may have an advantage in terms of engine power and performance, while the Suzuki may excel in terms of handling and comfort. Ultimately, the choice between the two models will depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.
Caractéristiques techniques Suzuki GSR 750 2017 par rapport à Yamaha MT-09 2017
Avantages et inconvénients en comparaison
Avantages et inconvénients en comparaison
Suzuki GSR 750 2017
Un design affûté avec un avant agressif et un arrière étroit - comme l'ont toujours souhaité les bandits de grand chemin. Il est dommage que le bras oscillant arrière ait été négligé (officiellement pour des raisons de poids, officieusement pour des raisons de coûts), et le système de freinage avant à double piston semble un peu faible. Mais la performance pendant la conduite, aussi bien à grande vitesse que dans les épingles, est tout à fait correcte.
Yamaha MT-09 2017
En conclusion, après plusieurs arrêts tout au long de la saison, je peux dire que le résultat est excellent. Notre MT-09 est parfaite, tant en termes de performances que d'esthétique. Le châssis a probablement été notre point le plus important. Alors qu'il y avait auparavant beaucoup (trop) de mouvement à l'arrière dans les virages rapides, il a été repassé sans sourciller. L'amortisseur STX 46 monté est assez ferme dans sa conception de base, mais il se débrouille sans problème au quotidien sans être désagréable. Grâce aux possibilités de réglage généreuses, il y a de toute façon encore de la marge pour les préférences individuelles et l'utilisation. La fonction de la cartouche NIX 30 est également impressionnante. La réactivité s'est nettement améliorée, surtout en charge. De même, il y a maintenant beaucoup plus de réserve disponible lors du freinage sur piste. Là où, avec le réglage d'origine, la fourche se bloquait et déclenchait l'ABS en cas de freinages violents, le freinage se poursuit désormais efficacement. De plus, la MT-09 suit désormais la ligne visée dans le rayon de virage comme si elle était seule - un vrai plaisir. La vue et le son du système complet Akrapovic sont également un pur plaisir, et le fait qu'il en résulte encore quelques chevaux de plus se ressent surtout dans le tiers supérieur du régime. La roue avant s'élance encore plus volontiers dans la galerie en 2e et 3e vitesse.
Comparaison des prix Prix moyen du marché Suzuki GSR 750 vs Yamaha MT-09
There are a few key differences between a Suzuki GSR 750 2017 and a Yamaha MT-09 2017. It takes less time to sell a Yamaha MT-09 with 73 days compared to 117 days for the Suzuki GSR 750. Since model year 2011 1000PS.de editors have written 12 reviews for the Suzuki GSR 750 and 57 reviews for the Yamaha MT-09 since model year 2013. The first review for the Suzuki GSR 750 was published on 10/5/2010 and now has more than 5,400 views. This compares to more than 39,900 views for the first review on Yamaha MT-09 published on 6/10/2013.
